public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
	 Qais Yousef <qyousef@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	 Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	 Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	 Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>,
	Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@google.com>,
	 Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,  Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>,
	 Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	kernel-team@android.com,  "Connor O'Brien" <connoro@google.com>,
	John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 05/23] locking/mutex: Rework task_struct::blocked_on
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:18:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231220001856.3710363-6-jstultz@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231220001856.3710363-1-jstultz@google.com>

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

Track the blocked-on relation for mutexes, to allow following this
relation at schedule time.

   task
     | blocked-on
     v
   mutex
     | owner
     v
   task

Also adds a blocked_on_state value so we can distinguqish when a
task is blocked_on a mutex, but is either blocked, waking up, or
runnable (such that it can try to aquire the lock its blocked
on).

This avoids some of the subtle & racy games where the blocked_on
state gets cleared, only to have it re-added by the
mutex_lock_slowpath call when it tries to aquire the lock on
wakeup

Also adds blocked_lock to the task_struct so we can safely
serialize the blocked-on state.

Finally adds wrappers that are useful to provide correctness
checks. Folded in from a patch by:
   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>

This all will be used for tracking blocked-task/mutex chains
with the prox-execution patch in a similar fashion to how
priority inheritence is done with rt_mutexes.

Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>
Cc: Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>
Cc: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
[minor changes while rebasing]
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
[jstultz: Fix blocked_on tracking in __mutex_lock_common in error paths]
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
---
v2:
* Fixed blocked_on tracking in error paths that was causing crashes
v4:
* Ensure we clear blocked_on when waking ww_mutexes to die or wound.
  This is critical so we don't get ciruclar blocked_on relationships
  that can't be resolved.
v5:
* Fix potential bug where the skip_wait path might clear blocked_on
  when that path never set it
* Slight tweaks to where we set blocked_on to make it consistent,
  along with extra WARN_ON correctness checking
* Minor comment changes
v7:
* Minor commit message change suggested by Metin Kaya
* Fix WARN_ON conditionals in unlock path (as blocked_on might
  already be cleared), found while looking at issue Metin Kaya
  raised.
* Minor tweaks to be consistent in what we do under the
  blocked_on lock, also tweaked variable name to avoid confusion
  with label, and comment typos, as suggested by Metin Kaya
* Minor tweak for CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC name change
* Moved unused block of code to later in the series, as suggested
  by Metin Kaya
* Switch to a tri-state to be able to distinguish from waking and
  runnable so we can later safely do return migration from ttwu
* Folded together with related blocked_on changes
---
 include/linux/sched.h        | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 init/init_task.c             |  1 +
 kernel/fork.c                |  4 ++--
 kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c |  9 ++++----
 kernel/locking/mutex.c       | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h    | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 kernel/sched/core.c          |  6 ++++++
 7 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 1e80c330f755..bfe8670f99a1 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -743,6 +743,12 @@ struct kmap_ctrl {
 #endif
 };
 
+enum blocked_on_state {
+	BO_RUNNABLE,
+	BO_BLOCKED,
+	BO_WAKING,
+};
+
 struct task_struct {
 #ifdef CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK
 	/*
@@ -1149,10 +1155,9 @@ struct task_struct {
 	struct rt_mutex_waiter		*pi_blocked_on;
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
-	/* Mutex deadlock detection: */
-	struct mutex_waiter		*blocked_on;
-#endif
+	enum blocked_on_state		blocked_on_state;
+	struct mutex			*blocked_on;	/* lock we're blocked on */
+	raw_spinlock_t			blocked_lock;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
 	int				non_block_count;
@@ -2258,6 +2263,33 @@ static inline int rwlock_needbreak(rwlock_t *lock)
 #endif
 }
 
+static inline void set_task_blocked_on(struct task_struct *p, struct mutex *m)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&p->blocked_lock);
+
+	/*
+	 * Check we are clearing values to NULL or setting NULL
+	 * to values to ensure we don't overwrite exisiting mutex
+	 * values or clear already cleared values
+	 */
+	WARN_ON((!m && !p->blocked_on) || (m && p->blocked_on));
+
+	p->blocked_on = m;
+	p->blocked_on_state = m ? BO_BLOCKED : BO_RUNNABLE;
+}
+
+static inline struct mutex *get_task_blocked_on(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&p->blocked_lock);
+
+	return p->blocked_on;
+}
+
+static inline struct mutex *get_task_blocked_on_once(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	return READ_ONCE(p->blocked_on);
+}
+
 static __always_inline bool need_resched(void)
 {
 	return unlikely(tif_need_resched());
diff --git a/init/init_task.c b/init/init_task.c
index 5727d42149c3..0c31d7d7c7a9 100644
--- a/init/init_task.c
+++ b/init/init_task.c
@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ struct task_struct init_task
 	.journal_info	= NULL,
 	INIT_CPU_TIMERS(init_task)
 	.pi_lock	= __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_task.pi_lock),
+	.blocked_lock	= __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_task.blocked_lock),
 	.timer_slack_ns = 50000, /* 50 usec default slack */
 	.thread_pid	= &init_struct_pid,
 	.thread_node	= LIST_HEAD_INIT(init_signals.thread_head),
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 10917c3e1f03..b3ba3d22d8b2 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -2358,6 +2358,7 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
 	ftrace_graph_init_task(p);
 
 	rt_mutex_init_task(p);
+	raw_spin_lock_init(&p->blocked_lock);
 
 	lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
@@ -2456,9 +2457,8 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
 	lockdep_init_task(p);
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
+	p->blocked_on_state = BO_RUNNABLE;
 	p->blocked_on = NULL; /* not blocked yet */
-#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_BCACHE
 	p->sequential_io	= 0;
 	p->sequential_io_avg	= 0;
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
index bc8abb8549d2..1eedf7c60c00 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
@@ -52,17 +52,18 @@ void debug_mutex_add_waiter(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter,
 {
 	lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
 
-	/* Mark the current thread as blocked on the lock: */
-	task->blocked_on = waiter;
+	/* Current thread can't be already blocked (since it's executing!) */
+	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(get_task_blocked_on(task));
 }
 
 void debug_mutex_remove_waiter(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter,
 			 struct task_struct *task)
 {
+	struct mutex *blocked_on = get_task_blocked_on_once(task);
+
 	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(list_empty(&waiter->list));
 	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(waiter->task != task);
-	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(task->blocked_on != waiter);
-	task->blocked_on = NULL;
+	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(blocked_on && blocked_on != lock);
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&waiter->list);
 	waiter->task = NULL;
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index 543774506fdb..6084470773f6 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -592,6 +592,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
 	}
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock(&current->blocked_lock);
 	/*
 	 * After waiting to acquire the wait_lock, try again.
 	 */
@@ -622,6 +623,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
 			goto err_early_kill;
 	}
 
+	set_task_blocked_on(current, lock);
 	set_current_state(state);
 	trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_MUTEX);
 	for (;;) {
@@ -652,6 +654,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
 				goto err;
 		}
 
+		raw_spin_unlock(&current->blocked_lock);
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
 		/* Make sure we do wakeups before calling schedule */
 		if (!wake_q_empty(&wake_q)) {
@@ -662,6 +665,13 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
 
 		first = __mutex_waiter_is_first(lock, &waiter);
 
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
+		raw_spin_lock(&current->blocked_lock);
+
+		/*
+		 * Re-set blocked_on_state as unlock path set it to WAKING/RUNNABLE
+		 */
+		current->blocked_on_state = BO_BLOCKED;
 		set_current_state(state);
 		/*
 		 * Here we order against unlock; we must either see it change
@@ -672,16 +682,25 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
 			break;
 
 		if (first) {
+			bool opt_acquired;
+
+			/*
+			 * mutex_optimistic_spin() can schedule, so  we need to
+			 * release these locks before calling it.
+			 */
+			raw_spin_unlock(&current->blocked_lock);
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
 			trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_MUTEX | LCB_F_SPIN);
-			if (mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, &waiter))
+			opt_acquired = mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, &waiter);
+			raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
+			raw_spin_lock(&current->blocked_lock);
+			if (opt_acquired)
 				break;
 			trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_MUTEX);
 		}
-
-		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
 	}
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
 acquired:
+	set_task_blocked_on(current, NULL);
 	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
 
 	if (ww_ctx) {
@@ -706,16 +725,20 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int state, unsigned int subclas
 	if (ww_ctx)
 		ww_mutex_lock_acquired(ww, ww_ctx);
 
+	raw_spin_unlock(&current->blocked_lock);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
 	wake_up_q(&wake_q);
 	preempt_enable();
 	return 0;
 
 err:
+	set_task_blocked_on(current, NULL);
 	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
 	__mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
 err_early_kill:
+	WARN_ON(current->blocked_on);
 	trace_contention_end(lock, ret);
+	raw_spin_unlock(&current->blocked_lock);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
 	debug_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
 	mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, ip);
@@ -925,8 +948,12 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
 
 		next = waiter->task;
 
+		raw_spin_lock(&next->blocked_lock);
 		debug_mutex_wake_waiter(lock, waiter);
+		WARN_ON(next->blocked_on != lock);
+		next->blocked_on_state = BO_WAKING;
 		wake_q_add(&wake_q, next);
+		raw_spin_unlock(&next->blocked_lock);
 	}
 
 	if (owner & MUTEX_FLAG_HANDOFF)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
index 9facc0ddfdd3..8dd21ff5eee0 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
@@ -281,10 +281,21 @@ __ww_mutex_die(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter,
 		return false;
 
 	if (waiter->ww_ctx->acquired > 0 && __ww_ctx_less(waiter->ww_ctx, ww_ctx)) {
+		/* nested as we should hold current->blocked_lock already */
+		raw_spin_lock_nested(&waiter->task->blocked_lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
 #ifndef WW_RT
 		debug_mutex_wake_waiter(lock, waiter);
 #endif
+		/*
+		 * When waking up the task to die, be sure to set the
+		 * blocked_on_state to WAKING. Otherwise we can see
+		 * circular  blocked_on relationships that can't
+		 * resolve.
+		 */
+		WARN_ON(waiter->task->blocked_on != lock);
+		waiter->task->blocked_on_state = BO_WAKING;
 		wake_q_add(wake_q, waiter->task);
+		raw_spin_unlock(&waiter->task->blocked_lock);
 	}
 
 	return true;
@@ -331,9 +342,18 @@ static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct MUTEX *lock,
 		 * it's wounded in __ww_mutex_check_kill() or has a
 		 * wakeup pending to re-read the wounded state.
 		 */
-		if (owner != current)
+		if (owner != current) {
+			/* nested as we should hold current->blocked_lock already */
+			raw_spin_lock_nested(&owner->blocked_lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+			/*
+			 * When waking up the task to wound, be sure to set the
+			 * blocked_on_state flag. Otherwise we can see circular
+			 * blocked_on relationships that can't resolve.
+			 */
+			owner->blocked_on_state = BO_WAKING;
 			wake_q_add(wake_q, owner);
-
+			raw_spin_unlock(&owner->blocked_lock);
+		}
 		return true;
 	}
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index a708d225c28e..4e46189d545d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4195,6 +4195,7 @@ bool ttwu_state_match(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int *success)
 int try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
 {
 	guard(preempt)();
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int cpu, success = 0;
 
 	if (p == current) {
@@ -4341,6 +4342,11 @@ int try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
 
 		ttwu_queue(p, cpu, wake_flags);
 	}
+	/* XXX can we do something better here for !CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC case */
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->blocked_lock, flags);
+	if (p->blocked_on_state == BO_WAKING)
+		p->blocked_on_state = BO_RUNNABLE;
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->blocked_lock, flags);
 out:
 	if (success)
 		ttwu_stat(p, task_cpu(p), wake_flags);
-- 
2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-20  0:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-20  0:18 [PATCH v7 00/23] Proxy Execution: A generalized form of Priority Inheritance v7 John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 01/23] sched: Unify runtime accounting across classes John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 02/23] locking/mutex: Remove wakeups from under mutex::wait_lock John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 03/23] locking/mutex: Make mutex::wait_lock irq safe John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 04/23] locking/mutex: Expose __mutex_owner() John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` John Stultz [this message]
2023-12-21 10:13   ` [PATCH v7 05/23] locking/mutex: Rework task_struct::blocked_on Metin Kaya
2023-12-21 17:52     ` John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 06/23] sched: Add CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC & boot argument to enable/disable John Stultz
2023-12-20  1:04   ` Randy Dunlap
2023-12-21 17:05     ` John Stultz
2023-12-28 15:06   ` Metin Kaya
2024-01-10 22:36     ` John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 07/23] locking/mutex: Switch to mutex handoffs for CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 08/23] sched: Split scheduler and execution contexts John Stultz
2023-12-21 10:43   ` Metin Kaya
2023-12-21 18:23     ` John Stultz
2024-01-03 14:49   ` Valentin Schneider
2024-01-10 22:24     ` John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 09/23] sched: Fix runtime accounting w/ split exec & sched contexts John Stultz
2024-01-03 13:47   ` Valentin Schneider
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 10/23] sched: Split out __sched() deactivate task logic into a helper John Stultz
2023-12-21 12:30   ` Metin Kaya
2023-12-21 18:49     ` John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 11/23] sched: Add a initial sketch of the find_proxy_task() function John Stultz
2023-12-21 12:55   ` Metin Kaya
2023-12-21 19:12     ` John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 12/23] sched: Fix proxy/current (push,pull)ability John Stultz
2023-12-21 15:03   ` Metin Kaya
2023-12-21 21:02     ` John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 13/23] sched: Start blocked_on chain processing in find_proxy_task() John Stultz
2023-12-21 15:30   ` Metin Kaya
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 14/23] sched: Handle blocked-waiter migration (and return migration) John Stultz
2023-12-21 16:12   ` Metin Kaya
2023-12-21 19:46     ` John Stultz
2024-01-02 15:33     ` Phil Auld
2024-01-04 23:33       ` John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 15/23] sched: Add blocked_donor link to task for smarter mutex handoffs John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 16/23] sched: Add deactivated (sleeping) owner handling to find_proxy_task() John Stultz
2023-12-22  8:33   ` Metin Kaya
2024-01-04 23:25     ` John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 17/23] sched: Initial sched_football test implementation John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:59   ` Randy Dunlap
2023-12-20  2:37     ` John Stultz
2023-12-22  9:32   ` Metin Kaya
2024-01-05  5:20     ` John Stultz
2023-12-28 15:19   ` Metin Kaya
2024-01-05  5:22     ` John Stultz
2023-12-28 16:36   ` Metin Kaya
2024-01-05  5:25     ` John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 18/23] sched: Add push_task_chain helper John Stultz
2023-12-22 10:32   ` Metin Kaya
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 19/23] sched: Consolidate pick_*_task to task_is_pushable helper John Stultz
2023-12-22 10:23   ` Metin Kaya
2024-01-04 23:44     ` John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 20/23] sched: Push execution and scheduler context split into deadline and rt paths John Stultz
2023-12-22 11:33   ` Metin Kaya
2024-01-05  0:01     ` John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 21/23] sched: Add find_exec_ctx helper John Stultz
2023-12-22 11:57   ` Metin Kaya
2024-01-05  3:12     ` John Stultz
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 22/23] sched: Refactor dl/rt find_lowest/latest_rq logic John Stultz
2023-12-22 13:52   ` Metin Kaya
2023-12-20  0:18 ` [PATCH v7 23/23] sched: Fix rt/dl load balancing via chain level balance John Stultz
2023-12-22 14:51   ` Metin Kaya
2024-01-05  3:42     ` John Stultz
2023-12-21  8:35 ` [PATCH v7 00/23] Proxy Execution: A generalized form of Priority Inheritance v7 Metin Kaya
2023-12-21 17:13   ` John Stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231220001856.3710363-6-jstultz@google.com \
    --to=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=Metin.Kaya@arm.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=connoro@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qyousef@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xuewen.yan94@gmail.com \
    --cc=youssefesmat@google.com \
    --cc=zezeozue@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox