From: fuqiang wang <fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] kexec: Fix potential out of bounds in crash_exclude_mem_range()
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 13:57:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231220055733.100325-3-fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231220055733.100325-1-fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn>
When the split does not occur on the last array member, the current code
will not return an error. So the correct array out-of-bounds check should
be mem->nr_ranges >= mem->max_nr_ranges.
When the OOB happen, the cmem->ranges[] have changed, so return early to
avoid it.
Signed-off-by: fuqiang wang <fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn>
---
kernel/crash_core.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/crash_core.c b/kernel/crash_core.c
index d4313b53837e..b1ab61c74fd2 100644
--- a/kernel/crash_core.c
+++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
@@ -611,6 +611,9 @@ int crash_exclude_mem_range(struct crash_mem *mem,
}
if (p_start > start && p_end < end) {
+ /* Split happened */
+ if (mem->nr_ranges >= mem->max_nr_ranges)
+ return -ENOMEM;
/* Split original range */
mem->ranges[i].end = p_start - 1;
temp_range.start = p_end + 1;
@@ -626,10 +629,6 @@ int crash_exclude_mem_range(struct crash_mem *mem,
if (!temp_range.end)
return 0;
- /* Split happened */
- if (i == mem->max_nr_ranges - 1)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
/* Location where new range should go */
j = i + 1;
if (j < mem->nr_ranges) {
--
2.42.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-20 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-20 5:57 [PATCH v2 0/2] kexec: fix potential cmem->ranges out of bounds fuqiang wang
2023-12-20 5:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/kexec: Fix potential out of bounds in crash_setup_memmap_entries() fuqiang wang
2023-12-21 13:14 ` Baoquan He
2023-12-22 11:41 ` fuqiang wang
2023-12-20 5:57 ` fuqiang wang [this message]
2023-12-21 11:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kexec: Fix potential out of bounds in crash_exclude_mem_range() Baoquan He
2023-12-22 11:08 ` fuqiang wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231220055733.100325-3-fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn \
--to=fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=ytcoode@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox