public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fuqiang wang <fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] kexec: Fix potential out of bounds in crash_exclude_mem_range()
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 13:57:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231220055733.100325-3-fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231220055733.100325-1-fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn>

When the split does not occur on the last array member, the current code
will not return an error. So the correct array out-of-bounds check should
be mem->nr_ranges >= mem->max_nr_ranges.

When the OOB happen, the cmem->ranges[] have changed, so return early to
avoid it.

Signed-off-by: fuqiang wang <fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn>
---
 kernel/crash_core.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/crash_core.c b/kernel/crash_core.c
index d4313b53837e..b1ab61c74fd2 100644
--- a/kernel/crash_core.c
+++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
@@ -611,6 +611,9 @@ int crash_exclude_mem_range(struct crash_mem *mem,
 		}
 
 		if (p_start > start && p_end < end) {
+			/* Split happened */
+			if (mem->nr_ranges >= mem->max_nr_ranges)
+				return -ENOMEM;
 			/* Split original range */
 			mem->ranges[i].end = p_start - 1;
 			temp_range.start = p_end + 1;
@@ -626,10 +629,6 @@ int crash_exclude_mem_range(struct crash_mem *mem,
 	if (!temp_range.end)
 		return 0;
 
-	/* Split happened */
-	if (i == mem->max_nr_ranges - 1)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
 	/* Location where new range should go */
 	j = i + 1;
 	if (j < mem->nr_ranges) {
-- 
2.42.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-20 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-20  5:57 [PATCH v2 0/2] kexec: fix potential cmem->ranges out of bounds fuqiang wang
2023-12-20  5:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/kexec: Fix potential out of bounds in crash_setup_memmap_entries() fuqiang wang
2023-12-21 13:14   ` Baoquan He
2023-12-22 11:41     ` fuqiang wang
2023-12-20  5:57 ` fuqiang wang [this message]
2023-12-21 11:42   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kexec: Fix potential out of bounds in crash_exclude_mem_range() Baoquan He
2023-12-22 11:08     ` fuqiang wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231220055733.100325-3-fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn \
    --to=fuqiang.wang@easystack.cn \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=ytcoode@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox