public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: jiangshanlai@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com,
	kernel-team@meta.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: Move pwq->max_active to wq->max_active
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:24:32 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231220072529.1036099-2-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231220072529.1036099-1-tj@kernel.org>

max_active is a workqueue-wide setting and the configured value is stored in
wq->saved_max_active; however, the effective value was stored in
pwq->max_active. While this is harmless, it makes max_active update process
more complicated and gets in the way of the planned max_active semantic
updates for unbound workqueues.

This patches moves pwq->max_active to wq->max_active. This simplifies the
code and makes freezing and noop max_active updates cheaper too. No
user-visible behavior change is intended.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 2989b57e154a..0e5dbeeb5778 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -250,7 +250,6 @@ struct pool_workqueue {
 	 * is marked with WORK_STRUCT_INACTIVE iff it is in pwq->inactive_works.
 	 */
 	int			nr_active;	/* L: nr of active works */
-	int			max_active;	/* L: max active works */
 	struct list_head	inactive_works;	/* L: inactive works */
 	struct list_head	pwqs_node;	/* WR: node on wq->pwqs */
 	struct list_head	mayday_node;	/* MD: node on wq->maydays */
@@ -298,7 +297,8 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
 	struct worker		*rescuer;	/* MD: rescue worker */
 
 	int			nr_drainers;	/* WQ: drain in progress */
-	int			saved_max_active; /* WQ: saved pwq max_active */
+	int			max_active;	/* WQ: max active works */
+	int			saved_max_active; /* WQ: saved max_active */
 
 	struct workqueue_attrs	*unbound_attrs;	/* PW: only for unbound wqs */
 	struct pool_workqueue	*dfl_pwq;	/* PW: only for unbound wqs */
@@ -1486,7 +1486,7 @@ static void pwq_dec_nr_in_flight(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, unsigned long work_
 		pwq->nr_active--;
 		if (!list_empty(&pwq->inactive_works)) {
 			/* one down, submit an inactive one */
-			if (pwq->nr_active < pwq->max_active)
+			if (pwq->nr_active < pwq->wq->max_active)
 				pwq_activate_first_inactive(pwq);
 		}
 	}
@@ -1787,7 +1787,7 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 	pwq->nr_in_flight[pwq->work_color]++;
 	work_flags = work_color_to_flags(pwq->work_color);
 
-	if (likely(pwq->nr_active < pwq->max_active)) {
+	if (likely(pwq->nr_active < pwq->wq->max_active)) {
 		if (list_empty(&pool->worklist))
 			pool->watchdog_ts = jiffies;
 
@@ -4136,50 +4136,6 @@ static void pwq_release_workfn(struct kthread_work *work)
 	}
 }
 
-/**
- * pwq_adjust_max_active - update a pwq's max_active to the current setting
- * @pwq: target pool_workqueue
- *
- * If @pwq isn't freezing, set @pwq->max_active to the associated
- * workqueue's saved_max_active and activate inactive work items
- * accordingly.  If @pwq is freezing, clear @pwq->max_active to zero.
- */
-static void pwq_adjust_max_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
-{
-	struct workqueue_struct *wq = pwq->wq;
-	bool freezable = wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	/* for @wq->saved_max_active */
-	lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);
-
-	/* fast exit for non-freezable wqs */
-	if (!freezable && pwq->max_active == wq->saved_max_active)
-		return;
-
-	/* this function can be called during early boot w/ irq disabled */
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
-
-	/*
-	 * During [un]freezing, the caller is responsible for ensuring that
-	 * this function is called at least once after @workqueue_freezing
-	 * is updated and visible.
-	 */
-	if (!freezable || !workqueue_freezing) {
-		pwq->max_active = wq->saved_max_active;
-
-		while (!list_empty(&pwq->inactive_works) &&
-		       pwq->nr_active < pwq->max_active)
-			pwq_activate_first_inactive(pwq);
-
-		kick_pool(pwq->pool);
-	} else {
-		pwq->max_active = 0;
-	}
-
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
-}
-
 /* initialize newly allocated @pwq which is associated with @wq and @pool */
 static void init_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 		     struct worker_pool *pool)
@@ -4212,9 +4168,6 @@ static void link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
 	/* set the matching work_color */
 	pwq->work_color = wq->work_color;
 
-	/* sync max_active to the current setting */
-	pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
-
 	/* link in @pwq */
 	list_add_rcu(&pwq->pwqs_node, &wq->pwqs);
 }
@@ -4665,6 +4618,46 @@ static int init_rescuer(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/**
+ * wq_adjust_max_active - update a wq's max_active to the current setting
+ * @wq: target workqueue
+ *
+ * If @wq isn't freezing, set @wq->max_active to the saved_max_active and
+ * activate inactive work items accordingly. If @wq is freezing, clear
+ * @wq->max_active to zero.
+ */
+static void wq_adjust_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
+{
+	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);
+
+	if ((wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE) && workqueue_freezing) {
+		wq->max_active = 0;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (wq->max_active == wq->saved_max_active)
+		return;
+
+	wq->max_active = wq->saved_max_active;
+
+	for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) {
+		unsigned long flags;
+
+		/* this function can be called during early boot w/ irq disabled */
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
+
+		while (!list_empty(&pwq->inactive_works) &&
+		       pwq->nr_active < wq->max_active)
+			pwq_activate_first_inactive(pwq);
+
+		kick_pool(pwq->pool);
+
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
+	}
+}
+
 __printf(1, 4)
 struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue(const char *fmt,
 					 unsigned int flags,
@@ -4672,7 +4665,6 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue(const char *fmt,
 {
 	va_list args;
 	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
-	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
 
 	/*
 	 * Unbound && max_active == 1 used to imply ordered, which is no longer
@@ -4707,6 +4699,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue(const char *fmt,
 
 	/* init wq */
 	wq->flags = flags;
+	wq->max_active = max_active;
 	wq->saved_max_active = max_active;
 	mutex_init(&wq->mutex);
 	atomic_set(&wq->nr_pwqs_to_flush, 0);
@@ -4735,8 +4728,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue(const char *fmt,
 	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
 	mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
-	for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)
-		pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
+	wq_adjust_max_active(wq);
 	mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
 
 	list_add_tail_rcu(&wq->list, &workqueues);
@@ -4874,8 +4866,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(destroy_workqueue);
  */
 void workqueue_set_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int max_active)
 {
-	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
-
 	/* disallow meddling with max_active for ordered workqueues */
 	if (WARN_ON(wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT))
 		return;
@@ -4886,10 +4876,7 @@ void workqueue_set_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int max_active)
 
 	wq->flags &= ~__WQ_ORDERED;
 	wq->saved_max_active = max_active;
-
-	for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)
-		pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
-
+	wq_adjust_max_active(wq);
 	mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(workqueue_set_max_active);
@@ -5135,8 +5122,8 @@ static void show_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
 	pr_info("  pwq %d:", pool->id);
 	pr_cont_pool_info(pool);
 
-	pr_cont(" active=%d/%d refcnt=%d%s\n",
-		pwq->nr_active, pwq->max_active, pwq->refcnt,
+	pr_cont(" active=%d refcnt=%d%s\n",
+		pwq->nr_active, pwq->refcnt,
 		!list_empty(&pwq->mayday_node) ? " MAYDAY" : "");
 
 	hash_for_each(pool->busy_hash, bkt, worker, hentry) {
@@ -5684,7 +5671,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_on_cpu_safe_key);
 void freeze_workqueues_begin(void)
 {
 	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
-	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
 
 	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
@@ -5693,8 +5679,7 @@ void freeze_workqueues_begin(void)
 
 	list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
 		mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
-		for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)
-			pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
+		wq_adjust_max_active(wq);
 		mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
 	}
 
@@ -5759,7 +5744,6 @@ bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void)
 void thaw_workqueues(void)
 {
 	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
-	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
 
 	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
@@ -5771,8 +5755,7 @@ void thaw_workqueues(void)
 	/* restore max_active and repopulate worklist */
 	list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
 		mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
-		for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)
-			pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq);
+		wq_adjust_max_active(wq);
 		mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
 	}
 
-- 
2.43.0


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-20  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-20  7:24 [PATCHSET wq/for-6.8] workqueue: Implement system-wide max_active for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2023-12-26  9:13   ` [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: Move pwq->max_active to wq->max_active Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:05     ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-26 21:36       ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 02/10] workqueue: Factor out pwq_is_empty() Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 03/10] workqueue: Replace pwq_activate_inactive_work() with [__]pwq_activate_work() Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 04/10] workqueue: Move nr_active handling into helpers Tejun Heo
2023-12-26  9:12   ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:06     ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 05/10] workqueue: Make wq_adjust_max_active() round-robin pwqs while activating Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 06/10] workqueue: Add first_possible_node and node_nr_cpus[] Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 07/10] workqueue: Move pwq_dec_nr_in_flight() to the end of work item handling Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 08/10] workqueue: Introduce struct wq_node_nr_active Tejun Heo
2023-12-26  9:14   ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:12     ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 09/10] workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 10/10] workqueue: Reimplement ordered workqueue using shared nr_active Tejun Heo
2024-01-13  0:18   ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  9:20 ` [PATCHSET wq/for-6.8] workqueue: Implement system-wide max_active for unbound workqueues Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-21 23:01   ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-22  8:04     ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-22  9:08       ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-05  2:44 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-12  0:49   ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-13  0:17     ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-15  5:46     ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-16 21:04       ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-30  2:24         ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-30 16:11           ` Tejun Heo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-25 17:05 [PATCHSET v3 wq/for-6.9] " Tejun Heo
2024-01-25 17:05 ` [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: Move pwq->max_active to wq->max_active Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231220072529.1036099-2-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox