From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: jiangshanlai@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com,
kernel-team@meta.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] workqueue: Make wq_adjust_max_active() round-robin pwqs while activating
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:24:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231220072529.1036099-6-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231220072529.1036099-1-tj@kernel.org>
wq_adjust_max_active() needs to activate work items after max_active is
increased. Previously, it did that by visiting each pwq once activating all
that could be activated. While this makes sense with per-pwq nr_active,
nr_active will be shared across multiple pwqs for unbound wqs. Then, we'd
want to round-robin through pwqs to be fairer.
In preparation, this patch makes wq_adjust_max_active() round-robin pwqs
while activating. While the activation ordering changes, this shouldn't
cause user-noticeable behavior changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 21bd4e4351f7..143c0b31505e 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -4699,7 +4699,7 @@ static int init_rescuer(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
*/
static void wq_adjust_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
{
- struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
+ bool activated;
lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);
@@ -4713,19 +4713,26 @@ static void wq_adjust_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
wq->max_active = wq->saved_max_active;
- for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) {
- unsigned long flags;
-
- /* this function can be called during early boot w/ irq disabled */
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
-
- while (pwq_activate_first_inactive(pwq))
- ;
+ /*
+ * Round-robin through pwq's activating the first inactive work item
+ * until max_active is filled.
+ */
+ do {
+ struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
- kick_pool(pwq->pool);
+ activated = false;
+ for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) {
+ unsigned long flags;
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
- }
+ /* can be called during early boot w/ irq disabled */
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
+ if (pwq_activate_first_inactive(pwq)) {
+ activated = true;
+ kick_pool(pwq->pool);
+ }
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
+ }
+ } while (activated);
}
__printf(1, 4)
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-20 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-20 7:24 [PATCHSET wq/for-6.8] workqueue: Implement system-wide max_active for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: Move pwq->max_active to wq->max_active Tejun Heo
2023-12-26 9:13 ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:05 ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-26 21:36 ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 02/10] workqueue: Factor out pwq_is_empty() Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 03/10] workqueue: Replace pwq_activate_inactive_work() with [__]pwq_activate_work() Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 04/10] workqueue: Move nr_active handling into helpers Tejun Heo
2023-12-26 9:12 ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:06 ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 06/10] workqueue: Add first_possible_node and node_nr_cpus[] Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 07/10] workqueue: Move pwq_dec_nr_in_flight() to the end of work item handling Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 08/10] workqueue: Introduce struct wq_node_nr_active Tejun Heo
2023-12-26 9:14 ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:12 ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 09/10] workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 10/10] workqueue: Reimplement ordered workqueue using shared nr_active Tejun Heo
2024-01-13 0:18 ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 9:20 ` [PATCHSET wq/for-6.8] workqueue: Implement system-wide max_active for unbound workqueues Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-21 23:01 ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-22 8:04 ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-22 9:08 ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-05 2:44 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-12 0:49 ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-13 0:17 ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-15 5:46 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-16 21:04 ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-30 2:24 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-30 16:11 ` Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-25 17:05 [PATCHSET v3 wq/for-6.9] " Tejun Heo
2024-01-25 17:05 ` [PATCH 05/10] workqueue: Make wq_adjust_max_active() round-robin pwqs while activating Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231220072529.1036099-6-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox