public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: jiangshanlai@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com,
	kernel-team@meta.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/10] workqueue: Move pwq_dec_nr_in_flight() to the end of work item handling
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:24:38 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231220072529.1036099-8-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231220072529.1036099-1-tj@kernel.org>

The planned shared nr_active handling for unbound workqueues will make
pwq_dec_nr_active() sometimes drop the pool lock temporarily to acquire
other pool locks, which is necessary as retirement of an nr_active count
from one pool may need kick off an inactive work item in another pool.

This patch moves pwq_dec_nr_in_flight() call in try_to_grab_pending() to the
end of work item handling so that work item state changes stay atomic.
process_one_work() which is the other user of pwq_dec_nr_in_flight() already
calls it at the end of work item handling. Comments are added to both call
sites and pwq_dec_nr_in_flight().

This shouldn't cause any behavior changes.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index a9f63cd61454..9982c63470e5 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1557,6 +1557,11 @@ static void pwq_dec_nr_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
  * A work either has completed or is removed from pending queue,
  * decrement nr_in_flight of its pwq and handle workqueue flushing.
  *
+ * NOTE:
+ * For unbound workqueues, this function may temporarily drop @pwq->pool->lock
+ * and thus should be called after all other state updates for the in-flight
+ * work item is complete.
+ *
  * CONTEXT:
  * raw_spin_lock_irq(pool->lock).
  */
@@ -1681,11 +1686,13 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork,
 		pwq_activate_work(pwq, work);
 
 		list_del_init(&work->entry);
-		pwq_dec_nr_in_flight(pwq, *work_data_bits(work));
 
 		/* work->data points to pwq iff queued, point to pool */
 		set_work_pool_and_keep_pending(work, pool->id);
 
+		/* must be the last step, see the function comment */
+		pwq_dec_nr_in_flight(pwq, *work_data_bits(work));
+
 		raw_spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 		return 1;
@@ -2745,6 +2752,8 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock)
 	worker->current_func = NULL;
 	worker->current_pwq = NULL;
 	worker->current_color = INT_MAX;
+
+	/* must be the last step, see the function comment */
 	pwq_dec_nr_in_flight(pwq, work_data);
 }
 
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-20  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-20  7:24 [PATCHSET wq/for-6.8] workqueue: Implement system-wide max_active for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: Move pwq->max_active to wq->max_active Tejun Heo
2023-12-26  9:13   ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:05     ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-26 21:36       ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 02/10] workqueue: Factor out pwq_is_empty() Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 03/10] workqueue: Replace pwq_activate_inactive_work() with [__]pwq_activate_work() Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 04/10] workqueue: Move nr_active handling into helpers Tejun Heo
2023-12-26  9:12   ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:06     ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 05/10] workqueue: Make wq_adjust_max_active() round-robin pwqs while activating Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 06/10] workqueue: Add first_possible_node and node_nr_cpus[] Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 08/10] workqueue: Introduce struct wq_node_nr_active Tejun Heo
2023-12-26  9:14   ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:12     ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 09/10] workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 10/10] workqueue: Reimplement ordered workqueue using shared nr_active Tejun Heo
2024-01-13  0:18   ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  9:20 ` [PATCHSET wq/for-6.8] workqueue: Implement system-wide max_active for unbound workqueues Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-21 23:01   ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-22  8:04     ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-22  9:08       ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-05  2:44 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-12  0:49   ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-13  0:17     ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-15  5:46     ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-16 21:04       ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-30  2:24         ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-30 16:11           ` Tejun Heo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-25 17:05 [PATCHSET v3 wq/for-6.9] " Tejun Heo
2024-01-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 07/10] workqueue: Move pwq_dec_nr_in_flight() to the end of work item handling Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231220072529.1036099-8-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox