From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: jiangshanlai@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com,
kernel-team@meta.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/10] workqueue: Move pwq_dec_nr_in_flight() to the end of work item handling
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:24:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231220072529.1036099-8-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231220072529.1036099-1-tj@kernel.org>
The planned shared nr_active handling for unbound workqueues will make
pwq_dec_nr_active() sometimes drop the pool lock temporarily to acquire
other pool locks, which is necessary as retirement of an nr_active count
from one pool may need kick off an inactive work item in another pool.
This patch moves pwq_dec_nr_in_flight() call in try_to_grab_pending() to the
end of work item handling so that work item state changes stay atomic.
process_one_work() which is the other user of pwq_dec_nr_in_flight() already
calls it at the end of work item handling. Comments are added to both call
sites and pwq_dec_nr_in_flight().
This shouldn't cause any behavior changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index a9f63cd61454..9982c63470e5 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1557,6 +1557,11 @@ static void pwq_dec_nr_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
* A work either has completed or is removed from pending queue,
* decrement nr_in_flight of its pwq and handle workqueue flushing.
*
+ * NOTE:
+ * For unbound workqueues, this function may temporarily drop @pwq->pool->lock
+ * and thus should be called after all other state updates for the in-flight
+ * work item is complete.
+ *
* CONTEXT:
* raw_spin_lock_irq(pool->lock).
*/
@@ -1681,11 +1686,13 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work, bool is_dwork,
pwq_activate_work(pwq, work);
list_del_init(&work->entry);
- pwq_dec_nr_in_flight(pwq, *work_data_bits(work));
/* work->data points to pwq iff queued, point to pool */
set_work_pool_and_keep_pending(work, pool->id);
+ /* must be the last step, see the function comment */
+ pwq_dec_nr_in_flight(pwq, *work_data_bits(work));
+
raw_spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
return 1;
@@ -2745,6 +2752,8 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock)
worker->current_func = NULL;
worker->current_pwq = NULL;
worker->current_color = INT_MAX;
+
+ /* must be the last step, see the function comment */
pwq_dec_nr_in_flight(pwq, work_data);
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-20 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-20 7:24 [PATCHSET wq/for-6.8] workqueue: Implement system-wide max_active for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: Move pwq->max_active to wq->max_active Tejun Heo
2023-12-26 9:13 ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:05 ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-26 21:36 ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 02/10] workqueue: Factor out pwq_is_empty() Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 03/10] workqueue: Replace pwq_activate_inactive_work() with [__]pwq_activate_work() Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 04/10] workqueue: Move nr_active handling into helpers Tejun Heo
2023-12-26 9:12 ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:06 ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 05/10] workqueue: Make wq_adjust_max_active() round-robin pwqs while activating Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 06/10] workqueue: Add first_possible_node and node_nr_cpus[] Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 08/10] workqueue: Introduce struct wq_node_nr_active Tejun Heo
2023-12-26 9:14 ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-26 20:12 ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 09/10] workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 7:24 ` [PATCH 10/10] workqueue: Reimplement ordered workqueue using shared nr_active Tejun Heo
2024-01-13 0:18 ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-20 9:20 ` [PATCHSET wq/for-6.8] workqueue: Implement system-wide max_active for unbound workqueues Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-21 23:01 ` Tejun Heo
2023-12-22 8:04 ` Lai Jiangshan
2023-12-22 9:08 ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-05 2:44 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-12 0:49 ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-13 0:17 ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-15 5:46 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-16 21:04 ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-30 2:24 ` Naohiro Aota
2024-01-30 16:11 ` Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-25 17:05 [PATCHSET v3 wq/for-6.9] " Tejun Heo
2024-01-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 07/10] workqueue: Move pwq_dec_nr_in_flight() to the end of work item handling Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231220072529.1036099-8-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox