From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A578A1C695 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 07:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="TozwqxXQ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1703057400; x=1734593400; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=BLjDO7r5mLL+cu5RRPPq2ChE9x4K9wfxRNFUHoEs1iw=; b=TozwqxXQg/xmvD3JMeqiL6dPpb5i4duvESg//k0RU+z2vbi2lKOmjbG2 zVCPQBVgLlOV4y+SnyBCJyqSV88XNdlx5z2s0o2ySQlEbBsTVUkJ5aKQE 9JlSEhvEAo3tKKeNHxE1kTZfh2SMcxExXY6Tt5flttNqTh1/YAjtlLH+h bxMS4y9C7HWI/De6dC+aue3iiy4/sEtJ1sIpklFgXnmLTCwohHL+mhgrb qUKnFhTK2EyvEfZeBNPJo+wBaOyCujNDtOJqBtM+oQ/+7aYyxlRrUMJDu wPbAMPGyVoOECc7LdtAWf1NpoOpp8DWoUHvoDmRsCsFVB99HUs387zRsX w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10929"; a="395502692" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,290,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="395502692" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Dec 2023 23:30:00 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10929"; a="899636416" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,290,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="899636416" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO b07ab15da5fe) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2023 23:29:58 -0800 Received: from kbuild by b07ab15da5fe with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rFr1g-0006Z7-0q; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 07:29:56 +0000 Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 15:29:05 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Kalesh Singh Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Fuad Tabba Subject: arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c:10:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_overflow_stack' was not declared. Should it be static? Message-ID: <202312201507.DlDhct9c-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master head: 55cb5f43689d7a9ea5bf35ef050f12334f197347 commit: 548ec3336f323db56260b312c232ab37285f0284 KVM: arm64: On stack overflow switch to hyp overflow_stack date: 1 year, 5 months ago config: arm64-randconfig-r112-20231117 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231220/202312201507.DlDhct9c-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231220/202312201507.DlDhct9c-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312201507.DlDhct9c-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c:10:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_overflow_stack' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/__pcpu_scope_overflow_stack +10 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/stacktrace.c 9 > 10 DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE/sizeof(long)], overflow_stack) -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki