From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D43C753E18 for ; Mon, 25 Dec 2023 21:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ReJXnd2q" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1703540946; x=1735076946; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=tdG5BbnB6LmrEO1jhGdnktv4c4lzn7LYDIVOM2d0oSI=; b=ReJXnd2qcG6DU/Wt5t+bjqwvtxvCsztDT+x5jNc5wDyz2iE+Tu3l1hgF ARNgulw11KYyaspeBtKuuS28b7mwZZLZtg6nIe5bZzcHcb5SsZmcPbOx8 4I77yyagZZYALPo2veq6vWlIzgoYZdYDD3iwpg6+K2cuqAzxQ/OZflHxU bTBg2nGu3trkkZwFCsuMlorISiA5ZuiG49lsWvZL0qCA6whlLU5MbUp3b GA9fdXu2FUENPIQ3VCxzh40TgQXTmDRft8W5n/Ob3GIjViPaK2quICqVx Af0TxKEV1Jx3e0jNjZAC5J6nTwFztOTve4UbKh7xYF4lnNvj3XBxClg3E g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10934"; a="395194864" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,304,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="395194864" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Dec 2023 13:49:06 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,304,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="19840129" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO b07ab15da5fe) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Dec 2023 13:49:04 -0800 Received: from kbuild by b07ab15da5fe with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rHsoo-000Dhp-1Q; Mon, 25 Dec 2023 21:49:02 +0000 Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 05:48:55 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Kalesh Singh Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Fuad Tabba Subject: arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c:52:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page' was not declared. Should it be static? Message-ID: <202312260529.UmEBsG7W-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master head: 861deac3b092f37b2c5e6871732f3e11486f7082 commit: db129d486ebdf4e3168282236f9d9008b42cac7e KVM: arm64: Implement non-protected nVHE hyp stack unwinder date: 1 year, 5 months ago config: arm64-randconfig-r112-20231117 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231226/202312260529.UmEBsG7W-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231226/202312260529.UmEBsG7W-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312260529.UmEBsG7W-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c:52:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/__pcpu_scope_kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page +52 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c 51 > 52 DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page); 53 unsigned long kvm_arm_hyp_percpu_base[NR_CPUS]; 54 DECLARE_KVM_NVHE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_nvhe_init_params, kvm_init_params); 55 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki