From: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com>
To: bhelgaas@google.com, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
dwmw2@infradead.org, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
lukas@wunner.de
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v8 0/5] fix vt-d hard lockup when hotplug ATS capable device
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 22:09:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231227030918.536413-1-haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com> (raw)
This patchset is used to fix vt-d hard lockup reported when surprise
unplug ATS capable endpoint device connects to system via PCIe switch
as following topology.
+-[0000:15]-+-00.0 Intel Corporation Ice Lake Memory Map/VT-d
| +-00.1 Intel Corporation Ice Lake Mesh 2 PCIe
| +-00.2 Intel Corporation Ice Lake RAS
| +-00.4 Intel Corporation Device 0b23
| \-01.0-[16-1b]----00.0-[17-1b]--+-00.0-[18]----00.0
NVIDIA Corporation Device 2324
| +-01.0-[19]----00.0
Mellanox Technologies MT2910 Family [ConnectX-7]
User brought endpoint device 19:00.0's link down by flapping it's hotplug
capable slot 17:01.0 link control register, as sequence DLLSC response,
pciehp_ist() will unload device driver and power it off, durning device
driver is unloading an iommu device-TLB invalidation (Intel vt-d spec, or
'ATS invalidation' in PCIe spec) request issued to that link down device,
thus a long time completion/timeout waiting in interrupt context causes
continuous hard lockup warnning and system hang.
Other detail, see every patch commit log.
patch [3&4] were tested by yehaorong@bytedance.com on stable v6.7-rc4.
patch [1&2] only passed compiling on stable v6.7-rc6.
change log:
v8:
- add a patch to break the loop for timeout device-TLB invalidation, as
Bjorn said there is possibility device just no reponse but not gone.
v7:
- reorder patches and revise commit log per Bjorn's guide.
- other code and commit log revise per Lukas' suggestion.
- rebased to stable v6.7-rc6.
v6:
- add two patches to break out device-TLB invalidation if device is gone.
v5:
- add a patch try to fix the rare case (surprise remove a device in
safe removal process). not work because surprise removal handling can't
re-enter when another safe removal is in process.
v4:
- move the PCI device state checking after ATS per Baolu's suggestion.
v3:
- fix commit description typo.
v2:
- revise commit[1] description part according to Lukas' suggestion.
- revise commit[2] description to clarify the issue's impact.
v1:
- https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231213034637.2603013-1-haifeng.zhao@
linux.intel.com/T/
Thanks,
Ethan
Ethan Zhao (5):
iommu/vt-d: add flush_target_dev member to struct intel_iommu and pass
device info to all ATS invalidation functions
iommu/vt-d: break out device-TLB invalidation if target device is gone
PCI: make pci_dev_is_disconnected() helper public for other drivers
iommu/vt-d: don't issue device-TLB invalidate request when device is
disconnected
iommu/vt-d: don't loop for timeout device-TLB invalidation request
forever
drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 1 +
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 2 ++
drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c | 4 ++++
drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 1 +
drivers/pci/pci.h | 5 -----
include/linux/pci.h | 5 +++++
7 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
2.31.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-12-27 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-27 3:09 Ethan Zhao [this message]
2023-12-27 3:09 ` [RFC PATCH v8 1/5] iommu/vt-d: add flush_target_dev member to struct intel_iommu and pass device info to all ATS invalidation functions Ethan Zhao
2023-12-27 3:09 ` [RFC PATCH v8 2/5] iommu/vt-d: break out device-TLB invalidation if target device is gone Ethan Zhao
2023-12-27 3:09 ` [RFC PATCH v8 3/5] PCI: make pci_dev_is_disconnected() helper public for other drivers Ethan Zhao
2023-12-27 3:09 ` [RFC PATCH v8 4/5] iommu/vt-d: don't issue device-TLB invalidate request when device is disconnected Ethan Zhao
2023-12-27 3:09 ` [RFC PATCH v8 5/5] iommu/vt-d: don't loop for timeout device-TLB invalidation request forever Ethan Zhao
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-12-28 0:16 [RFC PATCH v8 0/5] fix vt-d hard lockup when hotplug ATS capable device Ethan Zhao
2023-12-27 2:59 Ethan Zhao
2023-12-27 3:05 ` Ethan Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231227030918.536413-1-haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com \
--to=haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox