From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 751A8C2C5; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 23:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="aVfxCF7M" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1704064350; x=1735600350; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=62bNteZDkhz2KSoLHklFYTxgVS2scwtyvlyZ0y55ohg=; b=aVfxCF7MRKSUyHvY8XELb0DRX7xwG3YGxZ2rejirjVOhnrd1d4gJ9kP8 Ervh6qTXBJd4JxOuQ2zXA9NZbBeH0NN3XjxmFa6fmh3WuoVmqVzLxE5zi pX8/BqXBL9LcQzM26e92wM14R8g2dv+RtOO6bMbTf06bcjUGux49II5At yJPkXSetRygHEexPjXrduISElqmQPUCcF56MM859tzndsh6VNDAeYCem3 NAu5+VWVfOXxiHHS82y/yLrkZqUs6ChVOVFDjZlhTfQByl7ePAEcSPsmE QEH1qMU6v/Vh0oWHvHriacmSMnFRnyadmOfLLNpvYSAPvXdOdOT9AWHQJ Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10940"; a="3588643" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,321,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="3588643" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Dec 2023 15:12:29 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10940"; a="902746244" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,321,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="902746244" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO b07ab15da5fe) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 Dec 2023 15:12:23 -0800 Received: from kbuild by b07ab15da5fe with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rK4yi-000Jo0-34; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 23:12:20 +0000 Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 07:11:48 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Sagi Maimon , richardcochran@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org, datglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, arnd@arndb.de, geert@linux-m68k.org, peterz@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, sohil.mehta@intel.com, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, nphamcs@gmail.com, palmer@sifive.com, keescook@chromium.org, legion@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] posix-timers: add multi_clock_gettime system call Message-ID: <202401010719.QfVc3HOt-lkp@intel.com> References: <20231231170721.3381-1-maimon.sagi@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231231170721.3381-1-maimon.sagi@gmail.com> Hi Sagi, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on tip/x86/asm] [also build test ERROR on tip/timers/core linus/master v6.7-rc7] [cannot apply to arnd-asm-generic/master next-20231222] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sagi-Maimon/posix-timers-add-multi_clock_gettime-system-call/20240101-011104 base: tip/x86/asm patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231231170721.3381-1-maimon.sagi%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v4] posix-timers: add multi_clock_gettime system call config: sparc-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240101/202401010719.QfVc3HOt-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240101/202401010719.QfVc3HOt-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401010719.QfVc3HOt-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from arch/sparc/kernel/setup_64.c:21: >> include/linux/syscalls.h:1164:48: error: 'struct __ptp_multi_clock_get' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration [-Werror] 1164 | asmlinkage long sys_multi_clock_gettime(struct __ptp_multi_clock_get __user * ptp_multi_clk_get); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/sparc/kernel/setup_64.c:602:13: error: no previous prototype for 'alloc_irqstack_bootmem' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] 602 | void __init alloc_irqstack_bootmem(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors -- In file included from arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c:25: >> include/linux/syscalls.h:1164:48: error: 'struct __ptp_multi_clock_get' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration [-Werror] 1164 | asmlinkage long sys_multi_clock_gettime(struct __ptp_multi_clock_get __user * ptp_multi_clk_get); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors vim +1164 include/linux/syscalls.h 1154 1155 /* obsolete */ 1156 asmlinkage long sys_ipc(unsigned int call, int first, unsigned long second, 1157 unsigned long third, void __user *ptr, long fifth); 1158 1159 /* obsolete */ 1160 asmlinkage long sys_mmap_pgoff(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len, 1161 unsigned long prot, unsigned long flags, 1162 unsigned long fd, unsigned long pgoff); 1163 asmlinkage long sys_old_mmap(struct mmap_arg_struct __user *arg); > 1164 asmlinkage long sys_multi_clock_gettime(struct __ptp_multi_clock_get __user * ptp_multi_clk_get); 1165 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki