Re: [PATCH] kconfig: WERROR unmet symbol dependency

[Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>]

On (23/12/29 22:41), Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > > We do exit(1) for KCONFIG_WARN_UNKNOWN_SYMBOLS in conf_read().
> > > >
> > > > I can introduce two new helpers that will tell if confdata.c and symbol.c
> > > > triggered any warnings and if KCONFIG_WERROR is set. And then different
> > > > code paths can call them and handle exit gracefully, depending on the
> > > > context (ncurses, menu, etc.).
> > > >
> > > > Something like this
> > >
> > >
> > > I do not want to patch warnings one by one.
> > >
> > >
> > > I will take some time to think about it.
> >
> > Gentle ping on this.
> >
> > We are not concerned with every possible warning at the moment, however,
> > we do want the critical ones from CI and (semi)automated continuous uprev
> > PoV to be covered by WERROR. We do experience real life problems with
> > "missing direct dependency" not being a terminal condition under WERROR.
> 
> 
> Applied to linux-kbuild.

Thanks!