* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review
2024-01-03 16:53 [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-01-03 18:56 ` SeongJae Park
2024-01-03 19:55 ` Florian Fainelli
` (10 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-01-03 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, damon,
SeongJae Park
Hello,
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 17:53:49 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.71 release.
> There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.71-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] 55d8c3a7d744 ("Linux 6.1.71-rc1")
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---
ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon: debugfs_schemes.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon: debugfs_empty_targets.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon: debugfs_huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review
2024-01-03 16:53 [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-01-03 18:56 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2024-01-03 19:55 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-01-03 23:37 ` Kelsey Steele
` (9 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-01-03 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, allen.lkml
On 1/3/24 08:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.71 release.
> There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.71-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review
2024-01-03 16:53 [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-01-03 18:56 ` SeongJae Park
2024-01-03 19:55 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-01-03 23:37 ` Kelsey Steele
2024-01-04 0:15 ` Shuah Khan
` (8 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Kelsey Steele @ 2024-01-03 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 05:53:49PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.71 release.
> There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
No regressions found on WSL (x86 and arm64).
Built, booted, and reviewed dmesg.
Thank you.
Tested-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@linux.microsoft.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review
2024-01-03 16:53 [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-03 23:37 ` Kelsey Steele
@ 2024-01-04 0:15 ` Shuah Khan
2024-01-04 10:49 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (7 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-01-04 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, Shuah Khan
On 1/3/24 09:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.71 release.
> There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.71-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review
2024-01-03 16:53 [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-04 0:15 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-01-04 10:49 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-01-04 12:12 ` Jon Hunter
` (6 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-01-04 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 22:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.71 release.
> There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.71-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 6.1.71-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: 55d8c3a7d7448a75a541c078fd8e7b6abcbbac95
* git describe: v6.1.70-101-g55d8c3a7d744
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.70-101-g55d8c3a7d744
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.70)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.70)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.70)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.70)
## Test result summary
total: 135389, pass: 114436, fail: 2678, skip: 18148, xfail: 127
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 145 total, 145 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 49 total, 49 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 42 total, 42 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review
2024-01-03 16:53 [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-04 10:49 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-01-04 12:12 ` Jon Hunter
2024-01-04 12:15 ` Pavel Machek
` (5 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-01-04 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, linux-tegra,
stable
On Wed, 03 Jan 2024 17:53:49 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.71 release.
> There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.71-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.1:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.1.71-rc1-g55d8c3a7d744
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review
2024-01-03 16:53 [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-04 12:12 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-01-04 12:15 ` Pavel Machek
2024-01-04 21:45 ` Ron Economos
` (4 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2024-01-04 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 659 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.71 release.
> There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.1.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review
2024-01-03 16:53 [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-04 12:15 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2024-01-04 21:45 ` Ron Economos
2024-01-05 1:03 ` Guenter Roeck
` (3 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-01-04 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
On 1/3/24 8:53 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.71 release.
> There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.71-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review
2024-01-03 16:53 [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-04 21:45 ` Ron Economos
@ 2024-01-05 1:03 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-01-05 2:42 ` Namjae Jeon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2024-01-05 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 05:53:49PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.71 release.
> There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 157 pass: 157 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 544 pass: 544 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review
2024-01-03 16:53 [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-05 1:03 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2024-01-05 2:42 ` Namjae Jeon
2024-01-05 10:02 ` Yann Sionneau
2024-01-05 11:13 ` Shreeya Patel
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2024-01-05 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
2024-01-04 1:53 GMT+09:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.71 release.
> There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.71-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
I have tested smbtorture and tests through windows client against ksmbd.
Tested-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review
2024-01-03 16:53 [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-05 2:42 ` Namjae Jeon
@ 2024-01-05 10:02 ` Yann Sionneau
2024-01-05 11:13 ` Shreeya Patel
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Yann Sionneau @ 2024-01-05 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml
Hi Greg,
On 03/01/2024 17:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.71 release.
> There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.71-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
I tested 6.1.71-rc1 on Kalray kvx arch (not upstream yet), just to let
you know everything works in our CI.
It ran on real hw (k200 and k200lp boards), on qemu as well as on our
internal instruction set simulator (ISS).
Tests were run on several interfaces/drivers (usb, qsfp ethernet, eMMC,
PCIe endpoint+RC, SPI, remoteproc, uart, iommu). LTP and uClibc-ng
testsuites are also run without any regression.
Everything looks fine to us.
Tested-by Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@kalrayinc.com>
Thanks a lot!
--
Yann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review
2024-01-03 16:53 [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.71-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-05 10:02 ` Yann Sionneau
@ 2024-01-05 11:13 ` Shreeya Patel
11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Shreeya Patel @ 2024-01-05 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, kernel,
Gustavo Padovan
On Wednesday, January 03, 2024 22:23 IST, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.71 release.
> There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.71-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
KernelCI report for stable-rc/linux-6.1.y for this week :-
## stable-rc HEAD for linux-6.1.y:
Date: 2024-01-03
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/log/?h=1882ab3ed5b75d2cfd60da6d4eca87adce3a43f9
## Build failures:
No build failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-6.1.y commit head \o/
## Boot failures:
No **new** boot failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-6.1.y commit head \o/
Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
Thanks,
Shreeya Patel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread