public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
@ 2024-01-03 16:55 Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2024-01-03 17:44 ` Nam Cao
                   ` (14 more replies)
  0 siblings, 15 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-01-03 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
	shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Linux 6.6.10-rc1

Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
    netfilter: nf_tables: skip set commit for deleted/destroyed sets

Léo Lam <leo@leolam.fr>
    wifi: nl80211: fix deadlock in nl80211_set_cqm_rssi (6.6.x)

Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
    wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range use

Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
    tracing: Fix blocked reader of snapshot buffer

Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
    ftrace: Fix modification of direct_function hash while in use

Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
    ring-buffer: Fix wake ups when buffer_percent is set to 100

Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
    Revert "nvme-fc: fix race between error recovery and creating association"

Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
    mm/memory-failure: check the mapcount of the precise page

Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
    mm/memory-failure: cast index to loff_t before shifting it

Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@quicinc.com>
    mm: migrate high-order folios in swap cache correctly

Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
    mm/filemap: avoid buffered read/write race to read inconsistent data

Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
    selftests: secretmem: floor the memory size to the multiple of page_size

Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
    maple_tree: do not preallocate nodes for slot stores

Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
    platform/x86: p2sb: Allow p2sb_bar() calls during PCI device probe

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: fix slab-out-of-bounds in smb_strndup_from_utf16()

David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
    platform/x86/intel/pmc: Move GBE LTR ignore to suspend callback

David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
    platform/x86/intel/pmc: Allow reenabling LTRs

David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
    platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add suspend callback

Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
    block: renumber QUEUE_FLAG_HW_WC

Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
    mptcp: fix inconsistent state on fastopen race

Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
    mptcp: fix possible NULL pointer dereference on close

Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
    mptcp: refactor sndbuf auto-tuning

Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
    linux/export: Ensure natural alignment of kcrctab array

Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
    linux/export: Fix alignment for 64-bit ksymtab entries

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
    kexec: select CRYPTO from KEXEC_FILE instead of depending on it

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
    kexec: fix KEXEC_FILE dependencies

Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
    virtio_ring: fix syncs DMA memory with different direction

Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@huawei.com>
    fs: cifs: Fix atime update check

Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
    client: convert to new timestamp accessors

Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
    fs: new accessor methods for atime and mtime

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: avoid duplicate opinfo_put() call on error of smb21_lease_break_ack()

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: lazy v2 lease break on smb2_write()

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: send v2 lease break notification for directory

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: downgrade RWH lease caching state to RH for directory

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: set v2 lease capability

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: set epoch in create context v2 lease

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: don't update ->op_state as OPLOCK_STATE_NONE on error

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: move setting SMB2_FLAGS_ASYNC_COMMAND and AsyncId

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: release interim response after sending status pending response

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: move oplock handling after unlock parent dir

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: separately allocate ci per dentry

Zongmin Zhou <zhouzongmin@kylinos.cn>
    ksmbd: prevent memory leak on error return

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: fix kernel-doc comment of ksmbd_vfs_kern_path_locked()

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: no need to wait for binded connection termination at logoff

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: add support for surrogate pair conversion

Kangjing Huang <huangkangjing@gmail.com>
    ksmbd: fix missing RDMA-capable flag for IPoIB device in ksmbd_rdma_capable_netdev()

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: fix kernel-doc comment of ksmbd_vfs_setxattr()

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
    ksmbd: reorganize ksmbd_iov_pin_rsp()

Cheng-Han Wu <hank20010209@gmail.com>
    ksmbd: Remove unused field in ksmbd_user struct


-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                                  |   4 +-
 arch/powerpc/Kconfig                      |   4 +-
 arch/riscv/Kconfig                        |   4 +-
 arch/s390/Kconfig                         |   4 +-
 arch/x86/Kconfig                          |   4 +-
 drivers/nvme/host/fc.c                    |  21 +--
 drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/adl.c      |   9 +-
 drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/cnp.c      |  26 ++-
 drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c     |  12 +-
 drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h     |   7 +-
 drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/mtl.c      |   9 +-
 drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/tgl.c      |   9 +-
 drivers/platform/x86/p2sb.c               | 178 ++++++++++++++++-----
 drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c              |   6 +-
 fs/libfs.c                                |  41 +++--
 fs/smb/client/file.c                      |  18 ++-
 fs/smb/client/fscache.h                   |   6 +-
 fs/smb/client/inode.c                     |  17 +-
 fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c                   |   6 +-
 fs/smb/common/smb2pdu.h                   |   1 +
 fs/smb/server/connection.c                |  16 --
 fs/smb/server/ksmbd_work.c                |  51 +++---
 fs/smb/server/mgmt/user_config.h          |   1 -
 fs/smb/server/oplock.c                    | 118 ++++++++++++--
 fs/smb/server/oplock.h                    |   8 +-
 fs/smb/server/smb2misc.c                  |  15 +-
 fs/smb/server/smb2ops.c                   |   9 +-
 fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c                   | 258 ++++++++++++++++--------------
 fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c            |  40 +++--
 fs/smb/server/unicode.c                   | 187 ++++++++++++++++------
 fs/smb/server/vfs.c                       |  14 +-
 fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.c                 |  30 ++--
 fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.h                 |   9 +-
 include/linux/blkdev.h                    |   2 +-
 include/linux/export-internal.h           |   6 +-
 include/linux/fs.h                        |  85 ++++++++--
 kernel/Kconfig.kexec                      |   2 +
 kernel/trace/ftrace.c                     | 100 ++++++------
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c                |  12 +-
 kernel/trace/trace.c                      |  20 ++-
 lib/maple_tree.c                          |  11 ++
 mm/filemap.c                              |   9 ++
 mm/memory-failure.c                       |   8 +-
 mm/migrate.c                              |   9 +-
 net/mptcp/protocol.c                      |  27 +++-
 net/mptcp/protocol.h                      |  63 +++++++-
 net/mptcp/sockopt.c                       |   5 +-
 net/mptcp/subflow.c                       |  29 ++--
 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c             |   2 +-
 net/wireless/core.h                       |   1 +
 net/wireless/nl80211.c                    |  56 ++++---
 tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c          |   2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c |   3 +
 53 files changed, 1070 insertions(+), 524 deletions(-)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-03 16:55 [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-01-03 17:44 ` Nam Cao
  2024-01-03 18:57 ` SeongJae Park
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Nam Cao @ 2024-01-03 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml

On Wed,  3 Jan 2024 17:55:20 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Works for my Visionfive2 board (riscv64):

Tested-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>

Best regards,
Nam

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
@ 2024-01-03 18:08 Ronald Warsow
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Ronald Warsow @ 2024-01-03 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable; +Cc: linux-kernel

Hi Greg

no regressions here on x86_64
(Intel Rocket Lake: i5-11400)

Thanks

Tested-by: Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@gmx.de>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-03 16:55 [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2024-01-03 17:44 ` Nam Cao
@ 2024-01-03 18:57 ` SeongJae Park
  2024-01-03 22:04 ` Florian Fainelli
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2024-01-03 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, damon,
	SeongJae Park

Hello,

On Wed,  3 Jan 2024 17:55:20 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below.  Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].

Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>

[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] 5fd1c89851c4 ("Linux 6.6.10-rc1")

Thanks,
SJ

[...]

---

ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon: debugfs_schemes.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon: debugfs_empty_targets.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon: debugfs_huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: debugfs_rm_non_contexts.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon: sysfs_update_removed_scheme_dir.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon: reclaim.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon: lru_sort.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
 [33m
 [92mPASS [39m

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-03 16:55 [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2024-01-03 17:44 ` Nam Cao
  2024-01-03 18:57 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2024-01-03 22:04 ` Florian Fainelli
  2024-01-03 23:35 ` Kelsey Steele
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-01-03 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
  Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
	conor, allen.lkml

On 1/3/24 08:55, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on 
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
-- 
Florian


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-03 16:55 [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-01-03 22:04 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2024-01-03 23:35 ` Kelsey Steele
  2024-01-04  0:18 ` Shuah Khan
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Kelsey Steele @ 2024-01-03 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml

On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 05:55:20PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

No regressions found on WSL (x86 and arm64).

Built, booted, and reviewed dmesg.

Thank you.

Tested-by: Kelsey Steele <kelseysteele@linux.microsoft.com>  

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-03 16:55 [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-01-03 23:35 ` Kelsey Steele
@ 2024-01-04  0:18 ` Shuah Khan
  2024-01-04  2:24 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-01-04  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
  Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
	rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, Shuah Khan

On 1/3/24 09:55, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-03 16:55 [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-01-04  0:18 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-01-04  2:24 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
  2024-01-04  4:10 ` Daniel Díaz
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Takeshi Ogasawara @ 2024-01-04  2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml

Hi Greg

On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 2:13 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

6.6.10-rc1 tested.

Build successfully completed.
Boot successfully completed.
No dmesg regressions.
Video output normal.
Sound output normal.

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen10(Intel i7-1260P(x86_64) arch linux)

[    0.000000] Linux version 6.6.10-rc1rv
(takeshi@ThinkPadX1Gen10J0764) (gcc (GCC) 13.2.1 20230801, GNU ld (GNU
Binutils) 2.41.0) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jan  4 11:03:04 JST 2024

Thanks

Tested-by: Takeshi Ogasawara <takeshi.ogasawara@futuring-girl.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-03 16:55 [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-01-04  2:24 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
@ 2024-01-04  4:10 ` Daniel Díaz
  2024-01-04  7:15   ` Daniel Díaz
  2024-01-04  5:20 ` Bagas Sanjaya
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Díaz @ 2024-01-04  4:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
  Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
	rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml

Hello!

On 03/01/24 10:55 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

We're seeing a build regression with x86/GCC-8 and allmodconfig:

-----8<-----
   In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/string.h:294,
                    from /builds/linux/include/linux/bitmap.h:11,
                    from /builds/linux/include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
                    from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:17,
                    from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h:62,
                    from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:19,
                    from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5,
                    from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53,
                    from /builds/linux/include/linux/thread_info.h:60,
                    from /builds/linux/include/linux/uio.h:9,
                    from /builds/linux/include/linux/socket.h:8,
                    from /builds/linux/include/uapi/linux/if.h:25,
                    from /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:11:
   In function 'nl80211_set_cqm_rssi.isra.44',
       inlined from 'nl80211_set_cqm' at /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:13000:10:
   /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:57:29: error: '__builtin_memcpy' pointer overflow between offset 36 and size [-1, 9223372036854775807] [-Werror=array-bounds]
    #define __underlying_memcpy __builtin_memcpy
                                ^
   /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:648:2: note: in expansion of macro '__underlying_memcpy'
     __underlying_##op(p, q, __fortify_size);   \
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
   /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:693:26: note: in expansion of macro '__fortify_memcpy_chk'
    #define memcpy(p, q, s)  __fortify_memcpy_chk(p, q, s,   \
                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:12939:3: note: in expansion of macro 'memcpy'
      memcpy(cqm_config->rssi_thresholds, thresholds,
      ^~~~~~
   cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
   make[5]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:243: net/wireless/nl80211.o] Error 1
----->8-----

This is currently being bisected, so there is more to follow.


Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@linaro.org


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-03 16:55 [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-01-04  4:10 ` Daniel Díaz
@ 2024-01-04  5:20 ` Bagas Sanjaya
  2024-01-04  7:55 ` Luna Jernberg
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2024-01-04  5:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
  Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
	rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 557 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 05:55:20PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 

Successfully compiled and installed the kernel on my computer (Acer
Aspire E15, Intel Core i3 Haswell). No noticeable regressions.

Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-04  4:10 ` Daniel Díaz
@ 2024-01-04  7:15   ` Daniel Díaz
  2024-01-04  7:58     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Díaz @ 2024-01-04  7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
  Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
	rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, leo, johannes.berg

Hello!

On 03/01/24 10:10 p. m., Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On 03/01/24 10:55 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
>> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
> 
> We're seeing a build regression with x86/GCC-8 and allmodconfig:
> 
> -----8<-----
>    In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/string.h:294,
>                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/bitmap.h:11,
>                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
>                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:17,
>                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h:62,
>                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:19,
>                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5,
>                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53,
>                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/thread_info.h:60,
>                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/uio.h:9,
>                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/socket.h:8,
>                     from /builds/linux/include/uapi/linux/if.h:25,
>                     from /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:11:
>    In function 'nl80211_set_cqm_rssi.isra.44',
>        inlined from 'nl80211_set_cqm' at /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:13000:10:
>    /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:57:29: error: '__builtin_memcpy' pointer overflow between offset 36 and size [-1, 9223372036854775807] [-Werror=array-bounds]
>     #define __underlying_memcpy __builtin_memcpy
>                                 ^
>    /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:648:2: note: in expansion of macro '__underlying_memcpy'
>      __underlying_##op(p, q, __fortify_size);   \
>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:693:26: note: in expansion of macro '__fortify_memcpy_chk'
>     #define memcpy(p, q, s)  __fortify_memcpy_chk(p, q, s,   \
>                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:12939:3: note: in expansion of macro 'memcpy'
>       memcpy(cqm_config->rssi_thresholds, thresholds,
>       ^~~~~~
>    cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>    make[5]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:243: net/wireless/nl80211.o] Error 1
> ----->8-----
> 
> This is currently being bisected, so there is more to follow.

Bisection pointed to:

   commit 92045aab1bd9bfd73d816e907ea07739c4550b41
   Author: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
   Date:   Sat Dec 16 05:47:15 2023 +0000

       wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range use
       
       commit 7e7efdda6adb385fbdfd6f819d76bc68c923c394 upstream.

Reverting that was not possible, so I reverted 47f3694a4259 first ("wifi: nl80211: fix deadlock in nl80211_set_cqm_rssi (6.6.x)"), but that was not enough. After reverting both 47f3694a4259 and 92045aab1bd9, the build passed again.

Reproducer:

   tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch x86_64 --toolchain gcc-8 --kconfig allmodconfig


Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@linaro.org


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-03 16:55 [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-01-04  5:20 ` Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2024-01-04  7:55 ` Luna Jernberg
  2024-01-04  7:57   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2024-01-04 10:26 ` Ron Economos
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Luna Jernberg @ 2024-01-04  7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Luna Jernberg
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml

Tried to follow this guide:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Kernel/Traditional_compilation to
compile it on Crystal Linux based on Arch Linux on a Dell Latitude
7390 laptop with a Intel i5-8350U and did not get it to boot
but the same process worked for the stable 6.6.9 kernel, so guess i
will just wait for the stable 6.6.10 and try when thats out

Den ons 3 jan. 2024 kl 17:13 skrev Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------
> Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
>
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>     Linux 6.6.10-rc1
>
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
>     netfilter: nf_tables: skip set commit for deleted/destroyed sets
>
> Léo Lam <leo@leolam.fr>
>     wifi: nl80211: fix deadlock in nl80211_set_cqm_rssi (6.6.x)
>
> Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
>     wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range use
>
> Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>     tracing: Fix blocked reader of snapshot buffer
>
> Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>     ftrace: Fix modification of direct_function hash while in use
>
> Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>     ring-buffer: Fix wake ups when buffer_percent is set to 100
>
> Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
>     Revert "nvme-fc: fix race between error recovery and creating association"
>
> Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
>     mm/memory-failure: check the mapcount of the precise page
>
> Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
>     mm/memory-failure: cast index to loff_t before shifting it
>
> Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@quicinc.com>
>     mm: migrate high-order folios in swap cache correctly
>
> Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
>     mm/filemap: avoid buffered read/write race to read inconsistent data
>
> Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
>     selftests: secretmem: floor the memory size to the multiple of page_size
>
> Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
>     maple_tree: do not preallocate nodes for slot stores
>
> Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
>     platform/x86: p2sb: Allow p2sb_bar() calls during PCI device probe
>
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>     ksmbd: fix slab-out-of-bounds in smb_strndup_from_utf16()
>
> David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
>     platform/x86/intel/pmc: Move GBE LTR ignore to suspend callback
>
> David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
>     platform/x86/intel/pmc: Allow reenabling LTRs
>
> David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
>     platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add suspend callback
>
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>     block: renumber QUEUE_FLAG_HW_WC
>
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
>     mptcp: fix inconsistent state on fastopen race
>
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
>     mptcp: fix possible NULL pointer dereference on close
>
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
>     mptcp: refactor sndbuf auto-tuning
>
> Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
>     linux/export: Ensure natural alignment of kcrctab array
>
> Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
>     linux/export: Fix alignment for 64-bit ksymtab entries
>
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>     kexec: select CRYPTO from KEXEC_FILE instead of depending on it
>
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>     kexec: fix KEXEC_FILE dependencies
>
> Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
>     virtio_ring: fix syncs DMA memory with different direction
>
> Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@huawei.com>
>     fs: cifs: Fix atime update check
>
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
>     client: convert to new timestamp accessors
>
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
>     fs: new accessor methods for atime and mtime
>
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>     ksmbd: avoid duplicate opinfo_put() call on error of smb21_lease_break_ack()
>
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>     ksmbd: lazy v2 lease break on smb2_write()
>
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>     ksmbd: send v2 lease break notification for directory
>
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>     ksmbd: downgrade RWH lease caching state to RH for directory
>
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>     ksmbd: set v2 lease capability
>
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>     ksmbd: set epoch in create context v2 lease
>
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>     ksmbd: don't update ->op_state as OPLOCK_STATE_NONE on error
>
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>     ksmbd: move setting SMB2_FLAGS_ASYNC_COMMAND and AsyncId
>
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>     ksmbd: release interim response after sending status pending response
>
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>     ksmbd: move oplock handling after unlock parent dir
>
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>     ksmbd: separately allocate ci per dentry
>
> Zongmin Zhou <zhouzongmin@kylinos.cn>
>     ksmbd: prevent memory leak on error return
>
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>     ksmbd: fix kernel-doc comment of ksmbd_vfs_kern_path_locked()
>
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>     ksmbd: no need to wait for binded connection termination at logoff
>
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>     ksmbd: add support for surrogate pair conversion
>
> Kangjing Huang <huangkangjing@gmail.com>
>     ksmbd: fix missing RDMA-capable flag for IPoIB device in ksmbd_rdma_capable_netdev()
>
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>     ksmbd: fix kernel-doc comment of ksmbd_vfs_setxattr()
>
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
>     ksmbd: reorganize ksmbd_iov_pin_rsp()
>
> Cheng-Han Wu <hank20010209@gmail.com>
>     ksmbd: Remove unused field in ksmbd_user struct
>
>
> -------------
>
> Diffstat:
>
>  Makefile                                  |   4 +-
>  arch/powerpc/Kconfig                      |   4 +-
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig                        |   4 +-
>  arch/s390/Kconfig                         |   4 +-
>  arch/x86/Kconfig                          |   4 +-
>  drivers/nvme/host/fc.c                    |  21 +--
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/adl.c      |   9 +-
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/cnp.c      |  26 ++-
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c     |  12 +-
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h     |   7 +-
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/mtl.c      |   9 +-
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/tgl.c      |   9 +-
>  drivers/platform/x86/p2sb.c               | 178 ++++++++++++++++-----
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c              |   6 +-
>  fs/libfs.c                                |  41 +++--
>  fs/smb/client/file.c                      |  18 ++-
>  fs/smb/client/fscache.h                   |   6 +-
>  fs/smb/client/inode.c                     |  17 +-
>  fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c                   |   6 +-
>  fs/smb/common/smb2pdu.h                   |   1 +
>  fs/smb/server/connection.c                |  16 --
>  fs/smb/server/ksmbd_work.c                |  51 +++---
>  fs/smb/server/mgmt/user_config.h          |   1 -
>  fs/smb/server/oplock.c                    | 118 ++++++++++++--
>  fs/smb/server/oplock.h                    |   8 +-
>  fs/smb/server/smb2misc.c                  |  15 +-
>  fs/smb/server/smb2ops.c                   |   9 +-
>  fs/smb/server/smb2pdu.c                   | 258 ++++++++++++++++--------------
>  fs/smb/server/transport_rdma.c            |  40 +++--
>  fs/smb/server/unicode.c                   | 187 ++++++++++++++++------
>  fs/smb/server/vfs.c                       |  14 +-
>  fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.c                 |  30 ++--
>  fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.h                 |   9 +-
>  include/linux/blkdev.h                    |   2 +-
>  include/linux/export-internal.h           |   6 +-
>  include/linux/fs.h                        |  85 ++++++++--
>  kernel/Kconfig.kexec                      |   2 +
>  kernel/trace/ftrace.c                     | 100 ++++++------
>  kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c                |  12 +-
>  kernel/trace/trace.c                      |  20 ++-
>  lib/maple_tree.c                          |  11 ++
>  mm/filemap.c                              |   9 ++
>  mm/memory-failure.c                       |   8 +-
>  mm/migrate.c                              |   9 +-
>  net/mptcp/protocol.c                      |  27 +++-
>  net/mptcp/protocol.h                      |  63 +++++++-
>  net/mptcp/sockopt.c                       |   5 +-
>  net/mptcp/subflow.c                       |  29 ++--
>  net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c             |   2 +-
>  net/wireless/core.h                       |   1 +
>  net/wireless/nl80211.c                    |  56 ++++---
>  tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c          |   2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/memfd_secret.c |   3 +
>  53 files changed, 1070 insertions(+), 524 deletions(-)
>
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-04  7:55 ` Luna Jernberg
@ 2024-01-04  7:57   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-01-04  7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Luna Jernberg
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml

On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 07:55:02AM +0000, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> Tried to follow this guide:
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Kernel/Traditional_compilation to
> compile it on Crystal Linux based on Arch Linux on a Dell Latitude
> 7390 laptop with a Intel i5-8350U and did not get it to boot
> but the same process worked for the stable 6.6.9 kernel, so guess i
> will just wait for the stable 6.6.10 and try when thats out

Can you use 'git bisect' to find the offending commit?

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-04  7:15   ` Daniel Díaz
@ 2024-01-04  7:58     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2024-01-04  8:21       ` Johannes Berg
  2024-01-04 12:39       ` Naresh Kamboju
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-01-04  7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Díaz
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, leo,
	johannes.berg

On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 01:15:45AM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On 03/01/24 10:10 p. m., Daniel Díaz wrote:
> > Hello!
> > 
> > On 03/01/24 10:55 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> > > There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > >     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > 
> > > greg k-h
> > 
> > We're seeing a build regression with x86/GCC-8 and allmodconfig:
> > 
> > -----8<-----
> >    In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/string.h:294,
> >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/bitmap.h:11,
> >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
> >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:17,
> >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h:62,
> >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:19,
> >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5,
> >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53,
> >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/thread_info.h:60,
> >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/uio.h:9,
> >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/socket.h:8,
> >                     from /builds/linux/include/uapi/linux/if.h:25,
> >                     from /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:11:
> >    In function 'nl80211_set_cqm_rssi.isra.44',
> >        inlined from 'nl80211_set_cqm' at /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:13000:10:
> >    /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:57:29: error: '__builtin_memcpy' pointer overflow between offset 36 and size [-1, 9223372036854775807] [-Werror=array-bounds]
> >     #define __underlying_memcpy __builtin_memcpy
> >                                 ^
> >    /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:648:2: note: in expansion of macro '__underlying_memcpy'
> >      __underlying_##op(p, q, __fortify_size);   \
> >      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >    /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:693:26: note: in expansion of macro '__fortify_memcpy_chk'
> >     #define memcpy(p, q, s)  __fortify_memcpy_chk(p, q, s,   \
> >                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >    /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:12939:3: note: in expansion of macro 'memcpy'
> >       memcpy(cqm_config->rssi_thresholds, thresholds,
> >       ^~~~~~
> >    cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> >    make[5]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:243: net/wireless/nl80211.o] Error 1
> > ----->8-----
> > 
> > This is currently being bisected, so there is more to follow.
> 
> Bisection pointed to:
> 
>   commit 92045aab1bd9bfd73d816e907ea07739c4550b41
>   Author: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
>   Date:   Sat Dec 16 05:47:15 2023 +0000
> 
>       wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range use
>       commit 7e7efdda6adb385fbdfd6f819d76bc68c923c394 upstream.
> 
> Reverting that was not possible, so I reverted 47f3694a4259 first ("wifi: nl80211: fix deadlock in nl80211_set_cqm_rssi (6.6.x)"), but that was not enough. After reverting both 47f3694a4259 and 92045aab1bd9, the build passed again.
> 
> Reproducer:
> 
>   tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch x86_64 --toolchain gcc-8 --kconfig allmodconfig

Very odd, 6.1 works fine with this same compiler?  These changes were in
the 6.1.70 release (and the 6.1.66 release) before.

It was also in 6.6.5, before being reverted in 6.6.6, so why is this
causing a problem now?

confused,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-04  7:58     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-01-04  8:21       ` Johannes Berg
  2024-01-04 12:39       ` Naresh Kamboju
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2024-01-04  8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Daniel Díaz
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, leo

On Thu, 2024-01-04 at 08:58 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > 
> > > We're seeing a build regression with x86/GCC-8 and allmodconfig:
> > > 
> > > -----8<-----
> > >    In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/string.h:294,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/bitmap.h:11,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:17,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h:62,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:19,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/thread_info.h:60,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/uio.h:9,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/socket.h:8,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/include/uapi/linux/if.h:25,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:11:
> > >    In function 'nl80211_set_cqm_rssi.isra.44',
> > >        inlined from 'nl80211_set_cqm' at /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:13000:10:
> > >    /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:57:29: error: '__builtin_memcpy' pointer overflow between offset 36 and size [-1, 9223372036854775807] [-Werror=array-bounds]

This partially showed up upstream as well, but it was pretty hard to
see, so I think config and this very specific compiler version may be
affecting it as well.

> Very odd, 6.1 works fine with this same compiler?  These changes were in
> the 6.1.70 release (and the 6.1.66 release) before.
> 
> It was also in 6.6.5, before being reverted in 6.6.6, so why is this
> causing a problem now?

Yeah, it's all a bit weird.

Kees ended up fixing it upstream with commit 172db56d90d2 ("netlink:
Return unsigned value for nla_len()") (in net-next), but I cannot
actually say that I understand all what's going on here.

johannes

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-03 16:55 [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-01-04  7:55 ` Luna Jernberg
@ 2024-01-04 10:26 ` Ron Economos
  2024-01-04 11:53 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2024-01-04 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
  Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
	rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml

On 1/3/24 8:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-03 16:55 [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-01-04 10:26 ` Ron Economos
@ 2024-01-04 11:53 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
  2024-01-04 16:52 ` Jon Hunter
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2024-01-04 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
  Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
	rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, Vegard Nossum, Darren Kenny

Hi Greg,

On 03/01/24 10:25 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 

Built and boot tested on x86_64 and aarch64.

Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>

Thanks,
Harshit

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-04  7:58     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  2024-01-04  8:21       ` Johannes Berg
@ 2024-01-04 12:39       ` Naresh Kamboju
  2024-01-04 12:58         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2024-01-04 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: Daniel Díaz, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
	linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, leo,
	johannes.berg, Arnd Bergmann, Kees Cook

On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 at 13:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 01:15:45AM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > On 03/01/24 10:10 p. m., Daniel Díaz wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > On 03/01/24 10:55 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> > > > There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > >     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > >     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > >
> > > We're seeing a build regression with x86/GCC-8 and allmodconfig:
> > >
> > > -----8<-----
> > >    In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/string.h:294,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/bitmap.h:11,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:17,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h:62,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:19,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/thread_info.h:60,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/uio.h:9,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/socket.h:8,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/include/uapi/linux/if.h:25,
> > >                     from /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:11:
> > >    In function 'nl80211_set_cqm_rssi.isra.44',
> > >        inlined from 'nl80211_set_cqm' at /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:13000:10:
> > >    /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:57:29: error: '__builtin_memcpy' pointer overflow between offset 36 and size [-1, 9223372036854775807] [-Werror=array-bounds]
> > >     #define __underlying_memcpy __builtin_memcpy
> > >                                 ^
> > >    /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:648:2: note: in expansion of macro '__underlying_memcpy'
> > >      __underlying_##op(p, q, __fortify_size);   \
> > >      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >    /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:693:26: note: in expansion of macro '__fortify_memcpy_chk'
> > >     #define memcpy(p, q, s)  __fortify_memcpy_chk(p, q, s,   \
> > >                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >    /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:12939:3: note: in expansion of macro 'memcpy'
> > >       memcpy(cqm_config->rssi_thresholds, thresholds,
> > >       ^~~~~~
> > >    cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > >    make[5]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:243: net/wireless/nl80211.o] Error 1
> > > ----->8-----
> > >
> > > This is currently being bisected, so there is more to follow.
> >
> > Bisection pointed to:
> >
> >   commit 92045aab1bd9bfd73d816e907ea07739c4550b41
> >   Author: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> >   Date:   Sat Dec 16 05:47:15 2023 +0000
> >
> >       wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range use
> >       commit 7e7efdda6adb385fbdfd6f819d76bc68c923c394 upstream.
> >
> > Reverting that was not possible, so I reverted 47f3694a4259 first ("wifi: nl80211: fix deadlock in nl80211_set_cqm_rssi (6.6.x)"), but that was not enough. After reverting both 47f3694a4259 and 92045aab1bd9, the build passed again.
> >
> > Reproducer:
> >
> >   tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch x86_64 --toolchain gcc-8 --kconfig allmodconfig
>
> Very odd, 6.1 works fine with this same compiler?

It works on 6.1 with the same compiler.

> These changes were in
> the 6.1.70 release (and the 6.1.66 release) before.
>
> It was also in 6.6.5, before being reverted in 6.6.6, so why is this
> causing a problem now?

It was also noticed on 6.6.5-rc1
git_describe: v6.6.4-135-gb0b05ccdd77d

I have already reported this on a stable mailing list [1] on 6.6.5-rc1.

Please find more details and comments from Arnd [2] and Kees [3].

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYuL_-Q67t+Y7ST5taYv1XkkoJegH2zBvw_ZUOhF9QRiOg@mail.gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/ce99918f-eb6a-4ad7-aa44-9d27c27b6b00@app.fastmail.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/202311301016.84D0010@keescook/

Test results comparison,
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.9-50-g5fd1c89851c4/testrun/21921607/suite/build/test/gcc-8-allmodconfig/history/

- Naresh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-04 12:39       ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2024-01-04 12:58         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-01-04 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Naresh Kamboju
  Cc: Daniel Díaz, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
	linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, leo,
	johannes.berg, Arnd Bergmann, Kees Cook

On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 06:09:53PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 at 13:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 01:15:45AM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > On 03/01/24 10:10 p. m., Daniel Díaz wrote:
> > > > Hello!
> > > >
> > > > On 03/01/24 10:55 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> > > > > There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > let me know.
> > > > >
> > > > > Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > >
> > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > >     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz
> > > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > >     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > greg k-h
> > > >
> > > > We're seeing a build regression with x86/GCC-8 and allmodconfig:
> > > >
> > > > -----8<-----
> > > >    In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/string.h:294,
> > > >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/bitmap.h:11,
> > > >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
> > > >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:17,
> > > >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h:62,
> > > >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:19,
> > > >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5,
> > > >                     from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53,
> > > >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/thread_info.h:60,
> > > >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/uio.h:9,
> > > >                     from /builds/linux/include/linux/socket.h:8,
> > > >                     from /builds/linux/include/uapi/linux/if.h:25,
> > > >                     from /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:11:
> > > >    In function 'nl80211_set_cqm_rssi.isra.44',
> > > >        inlined from 'nl80211_set_cqm' at /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:13000:10:
> > > >    /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:57:29: error: '__builtin_memcpy' pointer overflow between offset 36 and size [-1, 9223372036854775807] [-Werror=array-bounds]
> > > >     #define __underlying_memcpy __builtin_memcpy
> > > >                                 ^
> > > >    /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:648:2: note: in expansion of macro '__underlying_memcpy'
> > > >      __underlying_##op(p, q, __fortify_size);   \
> > > >      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >    /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:693:26: note: in expansion of macro '__fortify_memcpy_chk'
> > > >     #define memcpy(p, q, s)  __fortify_memcpy_chk(p, q, s,   \
> > > >                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >    /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:12939:3: note: in expansion of macro 'memcpy'
> > > >       memcpy(cqm_config->rssi_thresholds, thresholds,
> > > >       ^~~~~~
> > > >    cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > > >    make[5]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:243: net/wireless/nl80211.o] Error 1
> > > > ----->8-----
> > > >
> > > > This is currently being bisected, so there is more to follow.
> > >
> > > Bisection pointed to:
> > >
> > >   commit 92045aab1bd9bfd73d816e907ea07739c4550b41
> > >   Author: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> > >   Date:   Sat Dec 16 05:47:15 2023 +0000
> > >
> > >       wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range use
> > >       commit 7e7efdda6adb385fbdfd6f819d76bc68c923c394 upstream.
> > >
> > > Reverting that was not possible, so I reverted 47f3694a4259 first ("wifi: nl80211: fix deadlock in nl80211_set_cqm_rssi (6.6.x)"), but that was not enough. After reverting both 47f3694a4259 and 92045aab1bd9, the build passed again.
> > >
> > > Reproducer:
> > >
> > >   tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch x86_64 --toolchain gcc-8 --kconfig allmodconfig
> >
> > Very odd, 6.1 works fine with this same compiler?
> 
> It works on 6.1 with the same compiler.
> 
> > These changes were in
> > the 6.1.70 release (and the 6.1.66 release) before.
> >
> > It was also in 6.6.5, before being reverted in 6.6.6, so why is this
> > causing a problem now?
> 
> It was also noticed on 6.6.5-rc1
> git_describe: v6.6.4-135-gb0b05ccdd77d
> 
> I have already reported this on a stable mailing list [1] on 6.6.5-rc1.
> 
> Please find more details and comments from Arnd [2] and Kees [3].
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYuL_-Q67t+Y7ST5taYv1XkkoJegH2zBvw_ZUOhF9QRiOg@mail.gmail.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/ce99918f-eb6a-4ad7-aa44-9d27c27b6b00@app.fastmail.com/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/202311301016.84D0010@keescook/
> 
> Test results comparison,
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.9-50-g5fd1c89851c4/testrun/21921607/suite/build/test/gcc-8-allmodconfig/history/

Ah, ok, thanks, I forgot about that.  All should be good then,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-03 16:55 [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-01-04 11:53 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
@ 2024-01-04 16:52 ` Jon Hunter
  2024-01-04 17:12 ` Allen
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2024-01-04 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
	shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml, linux-tegra,
	stable

On Wed, 03 Jan 2024 17:55:20 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v6.6:
    10 builds:	10 pass, 0 fail
    26 boots:	26 pass, 0 fail
    106 tests:	106 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	6.6.10-rc1-g5fd1c89851c4
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
                tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
                tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>

Jon

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-03 16:55 [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-01-04 16:52 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2024-01-04 17:12 ` Allen
  2024-01-05  1:04 ` Guenter Roeck
  2024-01-05  2:43 ` Namjae Jeon
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Allen @ 2024-01-04 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.

Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-03 16:55 [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-01-04 17:12 ` Allen
@ 2024-01-05  1:04 ` Guenter Roeck
  2024-01-05  2:43 ` Namjae Jeon
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2024-01-05  1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
	lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
	rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml

On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 05:55:20PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 

Build results:
	total: 157 pass: 157 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 545 pass: 545 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Guenter

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review
  2024-01-03 16:55 [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-01-05  1:04 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2024-01-05  2:43 ` Namjae Jeon
  14 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2024-01-05  2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
  Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
	patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
	sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, allen.lkml

2024-01-04 1:55 GMT+09:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release.
> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
I have tested smbtorture and tests through windows client against ksmbd.

Tested-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>

Thanks!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-05  2:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-03 16:55 [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-01-03 17:44 ` Nam Cao
2024-01-03 18:57 ` SeongJae Park
2024-01-03 22:04 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-01-03 23:35 ` Kelsey Steele
2024-01-04  0:18 ` Shuah Khan
2024-01-04  2:24 ` Takeshi Ogasawara
2024-01-04  4:10 ` Daniel Díaz
2024-01-04  7:15   ` Daniel Díaz
2024-01-04  7:58     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-01-04  8:21       ` Johannes Berg
2024-01-04 12:39       ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-01-04 12:58         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-01-04  5:20 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2024-01-04  7:55 ` Luna Jernberg
2024-01-04  7:57   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-01-04 10:26 ` Ron Economos
2024-01-04 11:53 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2024-01-04 16:52 ` Jon Hunter
2024-01-04 17:12 ` Allen
2024-01-05  1:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-01-05  2:43 ` Namjae Jeon
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-03 18:08 Ronald Warsow

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox