From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bmailout2.hostsharing.net (bmailout2.hostsharing.net [83.223.78.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FBFB1D68D; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 06:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=wunner.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=h08.hostsharing.net Received: from h08.hostsharing.net (h08.hostsharing.net [IPv6:2a01:37:1000::53df:5f1c:0]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "*.hostsharing.net", Issuer "RapidSSL TLS RSA CA G1" (verified OK)) by bmailout2.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C9412800B4B2; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 07:05:28 +0100 (CET) Received: by h08.hostsharing.net (Postfix, from userid 100393) id 1F6BD1D8B72; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 07:05:28 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 07:05:28 +0100 From: Lukas Wunner To: Ira Weiny Cc: Dan Williams , Jonathan Cameron , Smita Koralahalli , Shiju Jose , Yazen Ghannam , Davidlohr Bueso , Dave Jiang , Alison Schofield , Vishal Verma , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] PCI: Define scoped based management functions Message-ID: <20240104060528.GA10504@wunner.de> References: <20231220-cxl-cper-v5-0-1bb8a4ca2c7a@intel.com> <20231220-cxl-cper-v5-8-1bb8a4ca2c7a@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231220-cxl-cper-v5-8-1bb8a4ca2c7a@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 04:17:35PM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote: > --- a/include/linux/pci.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h > @@ -1170,6 +1170,7 @@ int pci_get_interrupt_pin(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_dev **bridge); > u8 pci_common_swizzle(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 *pinp); > struct pci_dev *pci_dev_get(struct pci_dev *dev); > void pci_dev_put(struct pci_dev *dev); > +DEFINE_FREE(pci_dev_put, struct pci_dev *, if (_T) pci_dev_put(_T)) pci_dev_put() already performs a NULL pointer check internally. Why duplicate it here? Thanks, Lukas