Re: [PATCH for-next v7 0/7] On-Demand Paging on SoftRoCE

Zhu Yanjun
2023-12-15T02:46:12Z

在 2023/12/14 13:55, Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu) 写道:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 3:08 AM Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>> 在 2023/12/7 14:37, Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu) 写道:
>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 10:51 AM Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>>>> 在 2023/12/5 8:11, Jason Gunthorpe 写道:
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 02:44:45PM +0900, Daisuke Matsuda wrote:
>>>>>> Daisuke Matsuda (7):
>>>>>> RDMA/rxe: Always defer tasks on responder and completer to workqueue
>>>>>> RDMA/rxe: Make MR functions accessible from other rxe source code
>>>>>> RDMA/rxe: Move resp_states definition to rxe_verbs.h
>>>>>> RDMA/rxe: Add page invalidation support
>>>>>> RDMA/rxe: Allow registering MRs for On-Demand Paging
>>>>>> RDMA/rxe: Add support for Send/Recv/Write/Read with ODP
>>>>>> RDMA/rxe: Add support for the traditional Atomic operations with ODP
>>>>> What is the current situation with rxe? I don't recall seeing the bugs
>>>>> that were reported get fixed?
>>> Well, I suppose Jason is mentioning "blktests srp/002 hang".
>>> cf. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/dsg6rd66tyiei32zaxs6ddv5ebefr5vtxjwz6d2ewqrcwisogl@ge7jzan7dg5u/T/
>>>
>>> It is likely to be a timing issue. Bob reported that "siw hangs with the debug kernel",
>>> so the hang looks not specific to rxe.
>>> cf. https://lore.kernel.org/all/53ede78a-f73d-44cd-a555-f8ff36bd9c55@acm.org/T/
>>> I think we need to decide whether to continue to block patches to rxe since nobody has successfully fixed the issue.
>>>
>>>
>>> There is another issue that causes kernel panic.
>>> [bug report][bisected] rdma_rxe: blktests srp lead kernel panic with 64k page size
>>> cf. https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHj4cs9XRqE25jyVw9rj9YugffLn5+f=1znaBEnu1usLOciD+g@mail.gmail.com/T/
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/list/?series=798592&state=*
>>> Zhijian has submitted patches to fix this, and he got some comments.
>>> It looks he is involved in CXL driver intensively these days.
>>> I guess he is still working on it.
>>>
>>>> Exactly. A problem is reported in the link
>>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg120947.html
>>>>
>>>> It seems that a variable 'entry' set but not used
>>>> [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>> Yeah, I can revise the patch anytime.
>>>
>>>> And ODP is an important feature. Should we suggest to add a test case
>>>> about this ODP in rdma-core to verify this ODP feature?
>>> Rxe can share the same tests with mlx5.
>>> I added test cases for Write, Read and Atomic operations with ODP,
>>> and we can add more tests if there are any suggestions.
>>> Cf. https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core/blob/master/tests/test_odp.py
>> Thanks a lot.
>> Do you make tests with blktests after your patches are applied with the
>> latest kernel?
> I have not done that yet, but I agree I should do it.
> I will try to take time for the test before submitting v8

Thanks. Hope blktest can work well with your commits.

Zhu Yanjun

>
> Thanks,
> Daisuke Matsuda
>
>
>> Zhu Yanjun
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Daisuke Matsuda
>>>
>>>> Zhu Yanjun
>>>>
>>>>> I'm reluctant to dig a deeper hold until it is done?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Jason