From: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Teo Couprie Diaz <teo.coupriediaz@arm.com>,
Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Guo Hui <guohui@uniontech.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: add compile-time test into is_compat_task()
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:24:33 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240104192433.109983-2-leobras@redhat.com> (raw)
Currently some parts of the codebase will test for CONFIG_COMPAT before
testing is_compat_task(), probably in order to avoid a run-time test into
the task structure, while other parts of codebase will just test even when
the option is not compiled in.
Since is_compat_task() is an inlined function, it would be helpful to add a
!CONFIG_COMPAT version of the helper, allowing compile-time optimization.
With this, the compiler is able to understand in build-time that
is_compat_task() will always return 0, and optimize-out some of the extra
code introduced by the option.
This allows optimizing-out code when the option is not selected, and
otherwise removing a lot #ifdefs that were introduced, making the code
more clean.
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h | 5 +++++
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 6 ++----
arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c | 5 +----
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
index ae904a1ad5293..3cc61cbbb9062 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
@@ -100,6 +100,11 @@ long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno);
#else /* !CONFIG_COMPAT */
+static inline int is_compat_task(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline int is_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
{
return 0;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
index 20d7ef82de90a..9f8781f1fdfda 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -173,7 +173,6 @@ static void ptrace_hbptriggered(struct perf_event *bp,
struct arch_hw_breakpoint *bkpt = counter_arch_bp(bp);
const char *desc = "Hardware breakpoint trap (ptrace)";
-#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
if (is_compat_task()) {
int si_errno = 0;
int i;
@@ -195,7 +194,7 @@ static void ptrace_hbptriggered(struct perf_event *bp,
desc);
return;
}
-#endif
+
arm64_force_sig_fault(SIGTRAP, TRAP_HWBKPT, bkpt->trigger, desc);
}
@@ -2112,7 +2111,6 @@ long compat_arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, compat_long_t request,
const struct user_regset_view *task_user_regset_view(struct task_struct *task)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
/*
* Core dumping of 32-bit tasks or compat ptrace requests must use the
* user_aarch32_view compatible with arm32. Native ptrace requests on
@@ -2123,7 +2121,7 @@ const struct user_regset_view *task_user_regset_view(struct task_struct *task)
return &user_aarch32_view;
else if (is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(task)))
return &user_aarch32_ptrace_view;
-#endif
+
return &user_aarch64_view;
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c
index 9a70d9746b661..ad198262b9817 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c
@@ -20,14 +20,11 @@ long sys_ni_syscall(void);
static long do_ni_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
- long ret;
if (is_compat_task()) {
- ret = compat_arm_syscall(regs, scno);
+ long ret = compat_arm_syscall(regs, scno);
if (ret != -ENOSYS)
return ret;
}
-#endif
return sys_ni_syscall();
}
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-04 19:24 Leonardo Bras [this message]
2024-01-04 20:43 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: add compile-time test into is_compat_task() Arnd Bergmann
2024-01-05 1:16 ` Leonardo Bras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240104192433.109983-2-leobras@redhat.com \
--to=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=guohui@uniontech.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=teo.coupriediaz@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox