From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] driver core: Keep the supplier fwnode consistent with the device
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:39:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024010436-bulb-direness-5582@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231114074632.192858-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com>
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 08:46:32AM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> The commit 3a2dbc510c43 ("driver core: fw_devlink: Don't purge child
> fwnode's consumer links") introduces the possibility to use the
> supplier's parent device instead of the supplier itself.
> In that case the supplier fwnode used is not updated and is no more
> consistent with the supplier device used.
>
> Use the fwnode consistent with the supplier device when checking flags.
>
> Fixes: 3a2dbc510c43 ("driver core: fw_devlink: Don't purge child fwnode's consumer links")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
> ---
> Changes v2 -> v3:
> Do not update the supplier handle in order to keep the original handle
> for debug traces.
>
> Changes v1 -> v2:
> Remove sup_handle check and related pr_debug() call as sup_handle cannot be
> invalid if sup_dev is valid.
>
> drivers/base/core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index 4d8b315c48a1..440b52ec027f 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -2082,7 +2082,7 @@ static int fw_devlink_create_devlink(struct device *con,
> * supplier device indefinitely.
> */
> if (sup_dev->links.status == DL_DEV_NO_DRIVER &&
> - sup_handle->flags & FWNODE_FLAG_INITIALIZED) {
> + sup_dev->fwnode->flags & FWNODE_FLAG_INITIALIZED) {
> dev_dbg(con,
> "Not linking %pfwf - dev might never probe\n",
> sup_handle);
> --
> 2.41.0
>
Is this still needed? If so, how come no one is noticing it?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-14 7:46 [PATCH v3 1/1] driver core: Keep the supplier fwnode consistent with the device Herve Codina
2024-01-04 15:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2024-01-08 13:23 ` Herve Codina
2024-03-19 14:55 ` Herve Codina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024010436-bulb-direness-5582@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox