From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8178012B69 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2024 08:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="mBPFC6DZ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78D2BC433C8; Sun, 7 Jan 2024 08:48:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1704617296; bh=y4TRGGpI+/ml6LOIl+zJ3q2Dsu3lbx11HTOffjZ29Ao=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mBPFC6DZphpwY0KPi/oVKUdRbVwu/de+XIckhplPWaFQKzks0VOc7/mTGvvyNfUJx s71yxRziR4uCWF10IUNpWxheIutxG2mPQXAVU4khzUFCJ0vKr1XXpuRkCFQ988QGTW IYlypkRbmJYJSfRgIuuX4u9aqWOoCi/IUlqMMUEQ= Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 09:48:13 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Carlos Llamas Cc: Tanzir Hasan , Arve =?iso-8859-1?B?SGr4bm5lduVn?= , Todd Kjos , Martijn Coenen , Joel Fernandes , Christian Brauner , Suren Baghdasaryan , Nick Desaulniers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Desaulniers Subject: Re: [PATCH] android: removed duplicate linux/errno Message-ID: <2024010712-sandbar-eligible-969a@gregkh> References: <20240104-removeduperror-v1-1-d170d4b3675a@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 04:35:30PM +0000, Carlos Llamas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 07:31:36PM +0000, Tanzir Hasan wrote: > > There are two linux/errno.h inclusions in this file. The second one has > > been removed and the file builds correctly. > > > > Fixes: 54ffdab82080 ("android: binder: binderfs.c: removed asm-generic/errno-base.h") > > I'm not sure that we can I this tag before the patch hits mainline. I > suppose it's ok since char-misc doesn't do forced updates? Yes, char-misc does not rebase (like any sane public-facing branch.) > Greg, is this fine? Yes. thanks, greg k-h