From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
Cc: richard clark <richard.xnu.clark@gmail.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: undefined reference to `__aarch64_cas4_sync' error on arm64 native build
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 01:48:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240109074843.GI19790@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9aef98eed96ed32962ce90499291cb30ad5e3e14.camel@xry111.site>
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 11:05:57AM +0800, Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-help wrote:
> But the Linux kernel cannot use neither libc.so nor libgcc.a.
I have built Linux using libgcc for many years. It is as easy as
+LIBGCC := $(shell $(CC) $(KBUILD_CFLAGS) -print-libgcc-file-name)
+libs-y += $(LIBGCC)
> (I know
> some non-Linux kernel developers are overusing libgcc.a for kernels, but
> IMO this is just wrong and Linux developers also do not do this. If the
> Linux kernel needs a symbol from libgcc the developers just provide
> their own implementation.)
Yes, and often they have fallen behind. When they eventually catch up
they usually just copy the GCC code anyway.
Originally the only reasonable argument for not linking against libgcc
was so kernel code would not accidentally use double-length divisions.
There are other simple ways to have all uses of __divti3 and similar
create link errors, so that is not really a good argument.
libgcc is an essential part of the compiler. For most targets, for most
code, GCC will not generate function calls, there usually are faster (or
smaller) things it can do, but it still is necessary to have libgcc for
more uncommon things. Using a partial copy of it, behind the times,
and maybe even incompatible, is not a great idea.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-09 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-02 3:29 undefined reference to `__aarch64_cas4_sync' error on arm64 native build richard clark
2024-01-02 8:53 ` richard clark
2024-01-04 18:18 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-08 1:28 ` richard clark
2024-01-08 10:51 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-08 10:56 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-01-09 2:55 ` richard clark
2024-01-09 3:05 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-01-09 6:04 ` richard clark
2024-01-09 7:48 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2024-01-09 8:09 ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-01-09 8:26 ` Segher Boessenkool
2024-01-10 5:59 ` richard clark
2024-01-10 14:10 ` Segher Boessenkool
2024-01-11 1:42 ` richard clark
2024-01-11 11:26 ` Mark Rutland
2024-01-15 9:23 ` richard clark
2024-01-09 2:52 ` richard clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240109074843.GI19790@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=richard.xnu.clark@gmail.com \
--cc=xry111@xry111.site \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox