public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
To: Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	peterz@infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] objtool: Make objtool check actually fatal upon fatal errors
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 12:20:53 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240109202053.ee26nc5kk5u5edrc@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADWks+YO7zdFoYfLn+qwD8FyZoU1EfYCq1sghFkrn-nXANYMhw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 07:48:30PM +0000, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > Note the latter may be problematic at the moment due to some outstanding
> > warnings reported by Arnd and randconfig build bots.  I try to fix those
> > when I can, but any help would be appreciated.
> 
> I guess we can override CONFIG_WERROR during dkms compilations, but
> then i still want to ensofrce OBJTOOL errors.
> 
> How abou introducing CONFIG_WERROR_OBJTOOL and make CONFIG_WERROR
> select CONFIG_WERROR_OBJTOOL? such that distributions can start to opt
> into CONFIG_WERROR_OBJTOOL for production builds, even if they cannot
> yet make the jump to CONFIG_WERROR?

Seems reasonable.

Though, keep in mind that even compiler warnings can cause boot failures
and security bugs.  So I wouldn't recommend sleeping at night unless
your distro also has CONFIG_WERROR=y.

-- 
Josh

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-09 20:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20231213134303.2302285-1-dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com>
2023-12-13 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] objtool: Make objtool check actually fatal upon fatal errors Dimitri John Ledkov
2024-01-08  9:15   ` Ingo Molnar
2024-01-09 19:24     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2024-01-09 19:48       ` Dimitri John Ledkov
2024-01-09 20:20         ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2023-12-13 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] objtool: make objtool SLS validation fatal when building with CONFIG_SLS=y Dimitri John Ledkov
2024-01-08  9:16   ` Ingo Molnar
2024-01-09 19:31   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-12-13 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] objtool: make objtool RETPOLINE validation fatal when building with CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y Dimitri John Ledkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240109202053.ee26nc5kk5u5edrc@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=dimitri.ledkov@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox