From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: Clean up "preempted in-kernel" logic
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 16:39:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240110003938.490206-1-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
Provide a dedicated helper to query if a *different* vCPU was preempted
in-kernel. x86's VMX is an oddball and can only check if the vCPU is in
kernel (versus userspace) if the vCPU is loaded on the current pCPU.
The existing kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel() "works", but it's an ugly mess as
KVM x86 is forced to check kvm_get_running_vcpu() to effectively undo the
multiplexing.
Note, I was sorely tempted to eliminate kvm_arch_dy_has_pending_interrupt()
and bury that logic in VMX code, but I ultimately decided to keep it as an
arch hook as it's entirely plausible that some other architecture can do
cross-vCPU IRQ checks, and if KVM is going to have the (somewhat dubious
IMO) logic, it's probably best to keep it in common code.
Sean Christopherson (4):
KVM: Add dedicated arch hook for querying if vCPU was preempted
in-kernel
KVM: x86: Rely solely on preempted_in_kernel flag for directed yield
KVM: x86: Clean up directed yield API for "has pending interrupt"
KVM: Add a comment explaining the directed yield pending interrupt
logic
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 16 +++++++---------
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 +
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
base-commit: 1c6d984f523f67ecfad1083bb04c55d91977bb15
--
2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
next reply other threads:[~2024-01-10 0:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-10 0:39 Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-01-10 0:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: Add dedicated arch hook for querying if vCPU was preempted in-kernel Sean Christopherson
2024-01-11 12:48 ` Yuan Yao
2024-01-10 0:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: Rely solely on preempted_in_kernel flag for directed yield Sean Christopherson
2024-01-10 7:55 ` Yuan Yao
2024-01-10 17:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-01-11 12:47 ` Yuan Yao
2024-01-10 0:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: Clean up directed yield API for "has pending interrupt" Sean Christopherson
2024-01-11 12:49 ` Yuan Yao
2024-01-10 0:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: Add a comment explaining the directed yield pending interrupt logic Sean Christopherson
2024-02-23 1:35 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: Clean up "preempted in-kernel" logic Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240110003938.490206-1-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox