From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5113350241 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 22:24:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="jEvgD3ZH" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1704925449; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fBOWuD+AHY9IJNnA7VqxZgcnrcyqcpD70bfuMsWeGQY=; b=jEvgD3ZHuS3Hmu7ciiWvF/yoeTwYdMJ6pwZxOugz4QttpVQzJrQz5rbI4Pd/VrcZGu1eBJ yqkq7O/WA5mUua+g48xxGg7XqOCwzVVdpZyQzuMt01qDbDGWS9sffSOmQYxqSQ7TQp7ONc dKL5rCmd6eQOkyqoB5wPtNQOq2XqSEE= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-681-pzmDWmo2NZ-zgHUhhjjPXw-1; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:24:08 -0500 X-MC-Unique: pzmDWmo2NZ-zgHUhhjjPXw-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40e566259e3so8895875e9.3 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:24:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704925446; x=1705530246; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=fBOWuD+AHY9IJNnA7VqxZgcnrcyqcpD70bfuMsWeGQY=; b=ke5HvYORxKlKUDrapCAdoceegvQr5OcGQNw5cOCErqlBRydT0drJ4PKaBm+7j4JDEL wZ46cmQKkgonPedADkHmhXVcUdsr+EMVaBHYGLUB4aoeLc8HKgQuBKSF8p8Ek7x64Ew4 qaXvO+qbr8+qddWItGbj5Tnm4VJbLApIiqtaM1IxFxUm+XFBhl3//xCZOTdA0ZJX0iQl k5Den5DTXhplkz14CbGRByxz7CAZCI9bA8dbNRdJDO1G94lrVmipv0aCGMtbOkOT1XvB rQj4CS57mRAip811jaofLG+4V9+kghX8EZwMwdvQPNdePQtfrXMA3VvMgLMjUv5ebH0C sbbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyMlt6koeWDHSsyTrDfWfd8u+vPq0qoMvn1qvA+1V1ny9zV761a trWVc9zOpb5x/wGbqfqnpct4itrfpvCmMA0uLFBN98896MniU4lpUSGbZ3s4b6edeR78QtRGCE7 EMcmiib/9wUntx+9yKrHek4OXbr4z8P459gCIdfKv X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4513:b0:40d:72b9:4403 with SMTP id t19-20020a05600c451300b0040d72b94403mr53599wmo.179.1704925446472; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:24:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHiLiNT7yBh6m9iddoQfphuCX3lPnIYZ1lLGnv3FnzjuC2FJxsefP3JW1UmZHgl2mqZVRb2ZQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4513:b0:40d:72b9:4403 with SMTP id t19-20020a05600c451300b0040d72b94403mr53592wmo.179.1704925445992; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:24:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from redhat.com ([2a06:c701:73ef:4100:2cf6:9475:f85:181e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s8-20020a05600c45c800b0040e527602c8sm3593896wmo.9.2024.01.10.14.24.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:24:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:24:02 -0500 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Steve Sistare Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Wang , Si-Wei Liu , Eugenio Perez Martin , Xuan Zhuo , Dragos Tatulea , Eli Cohen , Xie Yongji Subject: Re: [RFC V1 01/13] vhost-vdpa: count pinned memory Message-ID: <20240110172306-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <1704919215-91319-1-git-send-email-steven.sistare@oracle.com> <1704919215-91319-2-git-send-email-steven.sistare@oracle.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1704919215-91319-2-git-send-email-steven.sistare@oracle.com> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 12:40:03PM -0800, Steve Sistare wrote: > Remember the count of pinned memory for the device. > > Signed-off-by: Steve Sistare Can we have iommufd support in vdpa so we do not keep extending these hacks? > --- > drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c > index da7ec77cdaff..10fb95bcca1a 100644 > --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ struct vhost_vdpa { > int in_batch; > struct vdpa_iova_range range; > u32 batch_asid; > + long pinned_vm; > }; > > static DEFINE_IDA(vhost_vdpa_ida); > @@ -893,6 +894,7 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_pa_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v, struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb, > unpin_user_page(page); > } > atomic64_sub(PFN_DOWN(map->size), &dev->mm->pinned_vm); > + v->pinned_vm -= PFN_DOWN(map->size); > vhost_vdpa_general_unmap(v, map, asid); > vhost_iotlb_map_free(iotlb, map); > } > @@ -975,9 +977,10 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_map(struct vhost_vdpa *v, struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb, > return r; > } > > - if (!vdpa->use_va) > + if (!vdpa->use_va) { > atomic64_add(PFN_DOWN(size), &dev->mm->pinned_vm); > - > + v->pinned_vm += PFN_DOWN(size); > + } > return 0; > } > > -- > 2.39.3