From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@google.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/5] ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:48:33 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240116084833.f5537b00bae88afb0249492f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240115112359.65dcecbf@rorschach.local.home>
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 11:23:59 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 11:09:38 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> > No. The ring buffer logic should not care if the user of it is swapping
> > the entire ring buffer or not. It only cares if parts of the ring
> > buffer is being swapped or not. That's not the level of scope it should
> > care about. If we do not want a swap to happen in update_max_tr()
> > that's not ring_buffer.c's problem. The code to prevent that from
> > happening should be 100% in trace.c.
>
> What needs to be done, and feel free to add this as a separate patch,
> is to have checks where snapshot is used.
>
> (All errors return -EBUSY)
>
> Before allowing mapping, check to see if:
>
> 1) the current tracer has "use_max_tr" set.
> 2) any event has a "snapshot" trigger set
> 3) Any function has a "snapshot" command set
>
> Fail if any of the above is true.
>
> Also in reverse, if the buffer is mapped, then fail:
>
> 1) a tracer being set that has "use_max_tr" set.
> 2) a "snapshot" command being set on a function
> 3) a "snapshot" trigger being set on an event.
>
> For the last two, we may be able to get away with just a below as well.
> Adding the tr->flags bit. We could also add a tr->snapshot count to
> keep track of everything that is using a snapshot, and if that count is
> non-zero, mapping fails.
BTW, if we allow mapping per-cpu ring buffer, we may need "tr->mapped"
counter in addition to per-cpu mapped bit. Then we can just check
tr->snapshot at mapping, and tr->mapped at preparing snapshot.
Thank you,
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 2a7c6fd934e9..f534f74ae80f 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -1175,6 +1175,12 @@ static void tracing_snapshot_instance_cond(struct trace_array *tr,
> return;
> }
>
> + if (tr->flags & TRACE_ARRAY_FL_MAPPED) {
> + trace_array_puts(tr, "*** BUFFER IS MEMORY MAPPED ***\n");
> + trace_array_puts(tr, "*** Can not use snapshot (sorry) ***\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> local_irq_save(flags);
> update_max_tr(tr, current, smp_processor_id(), cond_data);
> local_irq_restore(flags);
>
>
> -- Steve
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-15 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-11 16:17 [PATCH v11 0/5] Introducing trace buffer mapping by user-space Vincent Donnefort
2024-01-11 16:17 ` [PATCH v11 1/5] ring-buffer: Zero ring-buffer sub-buffers Vincent Donnefort
2024-01-13 13:38 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-11 16:17 ` [PATCH v11 2/5] ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions Vincent Donnefort
2024-01-11 16:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-01-11 23:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-12 9:13 ` Vincent Donnefort
2024-01-12 15:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-12 15:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-15 4:43 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-15 15:37 ` Vincent Donnefort
2024-01-15 16:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-15 16:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-15 17:29 ` Vincent Donnefort
2024-01-15 18:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-15 23:48 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2024-01-11 16:17 ` [PATCH v11 3/5] tracing: Allow user-space mapping of the ring-buffer Vincent Donnefort
2024-01-11 16:17 ` [PATCH v11 4/5] Documentation: tracing: Add ring-buffer mapping Vincent Donnefort
2024-01-13 13:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-14 14:26 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-14 16:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-14 23:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-11 16:17 ` [PATCH v11 5/5] ring-buffer/selftest: Add ring-buffer mapping test Vincent Donnefort
2024-01-13 13:39 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-14 14:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-14 16:20 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240116084833.f5537b00bae88afb0249492f@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).