From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Wiehler <stefan.wiehler@nokia.com>,
patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
jonathanh@nvidia.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org,
allen.lkml@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.74-rc1 review
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 06:40:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024011902-unplanted-dice-2873@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96dc2b0b-ad51-42f9-a305-744d9d97272e@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:10:31AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> +Stefan,
>
> On 1/18/24 02:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.74 release.
> > There are 100 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 20 Jan 2024 10:42:49 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.74-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> ARM and ARM64 builds worked fine and passed tests, however BMIPS_GENERIC
> fails to build with:
>
> arch/mips/kernel/smp.c: In function 'start_secondary':
> arch/mips/kernel/smp.c:340:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'rcutree_report_cpu_starting'; did you mean 'rcu_cpu_starting'?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> rcutree_report_cpu_starting(cpu);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> rcu_cpu_starting
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> host-make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:250: arch/mips/kernel/smp.o] Error
> 1
> host-make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:500: arch/mips/kernel] Error 2
> host-make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:500: arch/mips] Error 2
> host-make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>
> which is caused by 7c20a4cc189eff36d5aeb586008a540d8024fbff ("mips/smp: Call
> rcutree_report_cpu_starting() earlier").
>
> It looks like rcutree_report_cpu_starting() has been introduced
> 448e9f34d91d1a4799fdb06a93c2c24b34b6fd9d ("rcu: Standardize explicit
> CPU-hotplug calls") which is in v6.7.
>
> For MIPS, it would like an adequate fix would be to
> 's/rcutree_report_cpu_starting/rcu_cpu_starting/' for the 6.1 and 6.6
> branches.
>
> Stefan, do you agree?
The offending commit has been dropped from the queue, sorry, I didn't
push out a new -rc yet.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-19 5:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-18 10:48 [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.74-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-01-18 11:36 ` Pavel Machek
2024-01-18 18:35 ` SeongJae Park
2024-01-18 19:10 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-01-19 3:52 ` Naresh Kamboju
2024-01-19 5:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2024-01-19 16:07 ` Stefan Wiehler
2024-01-19 16:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-01-19 16:38 ` [PATCH] mips/smp: Call rcu_cpu_starting() earlier Stefan Wiehler
2024-01-20 6:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-01-21 16:52 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-01-22 17:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-01-18 20:13 ` [PATCH 6.1 000/100] 6.1.74-rc1 review Sven Joachim
2024-01-19 0:44 ` Shuah Khan
2024-01-19 1:05 ` Allen
2024-01-19 8:59 ` Yann Sionneau
2024-01-19 14:11 ` Jon Hunter
2024-01-20 0:46 ` Ron Economos
2024-01-20 2:18 ` Miguel Ojeda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024011902-unplanted-dice-2873@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=allen.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=rwarsow@gmx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=srw@sladewatkins.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.wiehler@nokia.com \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox