From: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>
To: Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>, Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>,
Yanteng Si <siyanteng@loongson.cn>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs/zh_CN/power: Use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc()
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 11:02:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240121100200.GA2790@titan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a567932c-d878-44e5-836f-90fa15999ba6@link.tyut.edu.cn>
Hi Hu and Jonathan,
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 10:24:42PM +0800, Hu Haowen wrote:
>
> 在 2024/1/20 20:22, Erick Archer 写道:
> > As noted in the "Deprecated Interfaces, Language Features, Attributes,
> > and Conventions" documentation [1], size calculations (especially
> > multiplication) should not be performed in memory allocator (or similar)
> > function arguments due to the risk of them overflowing. This could lead
> > to values wrapping around and a smaller allocation being made than the
> > caller was expecting. Using those allocations could lead to linear
> > overflows of heap memory and other misbehaviors.
> >
> > So, in the example code use the purpose specific kcalloc() function
> > instead of the argument size * count in the kzalloc() function.
> >
> > Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
> > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162
> > Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/translations/zh_CN/power/opp.rst | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/power/opp.rst b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/power/opp.rst
> > index 8d6e3f6f6202..7470fa2d4c43 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/power/opp.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/power/opp.rst
> > @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count
> > {
> > /* 做一些事情 */
> > num_available = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(dev);
> > - speeds = kzalloc(sizeof(u32) * num_available, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + speeds = kcalloc(num_available, sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL);
>
>
> If the translated version is modified, I think the original file should
> follow as well at Documentation/power/opp.rst line 308:
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/power/opp.rst b/Documentation/power/opp.rst
> index a7c03c470980..dca35018214a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/power/opp.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/power/opp.rst
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count
> {
> /* Do things */
> num_available = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(dev);
> - speeds = kzalloc(sizeof(u32) * num_available, GFP_KERNEL);
> + speeds = kcalloc(sizeof(u32) * num_available, GFP_KERNEL);
> /* populate the table in increasing order */
> freq = 0;
> while (!IS_ERR(opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(dev, &freq)))
> {
As you both suggested, this change should be made if the original file is
changed. Therefore, before this patch I already sent another one [1] that
made the proposed changes to the original file.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/20240120120527.3866-1-erick.archer@gmx.com/
But if you prefer, I can send just one patch with the two changes.
Best regards,
Erick
>
> Thanks,
> Hu Haowen
>
>
> > /* 按升序填充表 */
> > freq = 0;
> > while (!IS_ERR(opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(dev, &freq))) {
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-21 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-20 12:22 [PATCH] docs/zh_CN/power: Use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc() Erick Archer
2024-01-20 14:24 ` Hu Haowen
2024-01-21 10:02 ` Erick Archer [this message]
2024-01-20 15:38 ` Jonathan Corbet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240121100200.GA2790@titan \
--to=erick.archer@gmx.com \
--cc=2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn \
--cc=alexs@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=siyanteng@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox