From: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
To: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Janek Kotas <jank@cadence.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v4 01/11] scsi: ufs: qcom: Perform read back after writing reset bit
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 11:21:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240122-ufs-reset-ensure-effect-before-delay-v4-1-6c48432151cc@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122-ufs-reset-ensure-effect-before-delay-v4-0-6c48432151cc@redhat.com>
Currently, the reset bit for the UFS provided reset controller (used by
its phy) is written to, and then a mb() happens to try and ensure that
hit the device. Immediately afterwards a usleep_range() occurs.
mb() ensure that the write completes, but completion doesn't mean that
it isn't stored in a buffer somewhere. The recommendation for
ensuring this bit has taken effect on the device is to perform a read
back to force it to make it all the way to the device. This is
documented in device-io.rst and a talk by Will Deacon on this can
be seen over here:
https://youtu.be/i6DayghhA8Q?si=MiyxB5cKJXSaoc01&t=1678
Let's do that to ensure the bit hits the device. By doing so and
guaranteeing the ordering against the immediately following
usleep_range(), the mb() can safely be removed.
Fixes: 81c0fc51b7a7 ("ufs-qcom: add support for Qualcomm Technologies Inc platforms")
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
---
drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h
index 9dd9a391ebb7..b9de170983c9 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h
@@ -151,10 +151,10 @@ static inline void ufs_qcom_assert_reset(struct ufs_hba *hba)
ufshcd_rmwl(hba, UFS_PHY_SOFT_RESET, UFS_PHY_SOFT_RESET, REG_UFS_CFG1);
/*
- * Make sure assertion of ufs phy reset is written to
- * register before returning
+ * Dummy read to ensure the write takes effect before doing any sort
+ * of delay
*/
- mb();
+ ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UFS_CFG1);
}
static inline void ufs_qcom_deassert_reset(struct ufs_hba *hba)
@@ -162,10 +162,10 @@ static inline void ufs_qcom_deassert_reset(struct ufs_hba *hba)
ufshcd_rmwl(hba, UFS_PHY_SOFT_RESET, 0, REG_UFS_CFG1);
/*
- * Make sure de-assertion of ufs phy reset is written to
- * register before returning
+ * Dummy read to ensure the write takes effect before doing any sort
+ * of delay
*/
- mb();
+ ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UFS_CFG1);
}
/* Host controller hardware version: major.minor.step */
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-22 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-22 17:21 [PATCH RFC v4 00/11] scsi: ufs: Remove overzealous memory barriers Andrew Halaney
2024-01-22 17:21 ` Andrew Halaney [this message]
2024-01-22 17:21 ` [PATCH RFC v4 02/11] scsi: ufs: qcom: Perform read back after writing REG_UFS_SYS1CLK_1US Andrew Halaney
2024-01-22 17:21 ` [PATCH RFC v4 03/11] scsi: ufs: qcom: Remove unnecessary mb() after writing testbus config Andrew Halaney
2024-01-22 17:21 ` [PATCH RFC v4 04/11] scsi: ufs: qcom: Perform read back after writing unipro mode Andrew Halaney
2024-01-22 17:21 ` [PATCH RFC v4 05/11] scsi: ufs: qcom: Perform read back after writing CGC enable Andrew Halaney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240122-ufs-reset-ensure-effect-before-delay-v4-1-6c48432151cc@redhat.com \
--to=ahalaney@redhat.com \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jank@cadence.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=quic_cang@quicinc.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).