From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Mikhail Ukhin <mish.uxin2012@yandex.ru>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, stable@vger.kernel.org,
lvc-project@linuxtesting.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mikhail Ivanov <iwanov-23@bk.ru>,
Pavel Koshutin <koshutin.pavel@yandex.ru>,
Artem Sadovnikov <ancowi69@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10/5.15] jfs: add check if log->bdev is NULL in lbmStartIO()
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 09:50:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024012246-passable-delegate-5528@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024011216-rubdown-buddhist-6d1e@gregkh>
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 08:31:30PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 07:50:07PM +0300, Mikhail Ukhin wrote:
> > Fuzzing of 5.10 stable branch shows NULL pointer dereference happens in
> > lbmStartIO() on log->bdev pointer. The reason for bdev being NULL is the
> > JFS_NOINTEGRITY flag is set on mount of this fs. When this flag is enabled,
> > it results in the open_dummy_log function being called, which initializes a
> > new dummy_log, but does not assign a value to bdev.
> >
> > The error is fixed in 5.18 by commit
> > 07888c665b405b1cd3577ddebfeb74f4717a84c4.
> > Backport of this commit is too intrusive, so it is more reasonable to apply
> > a small patch to fix this issue.
> >
> > Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with syzkaller.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ukhin <mish.uxin2012@yandex.ru>
> > Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov <iwanov-23@bk.ru>
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Koshutin <koshutin.pavel@yandex.ru>
> > Signed-off-by: Artem Sadovnikov <ancowi69@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > fs/jfs/jfs_logmgr.c | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Who is using jfs in 5.10 and 5.15? Why not just mark the filesystem as
> BROKEN there instead? If you need to access your ancient filesystem
> image just use a newer kernel.
>
> For filesystems that are not used in older kernels, work like this feels
> odd, especially for something just like a NULL dereference which doesn't
> do much, right?
Now dropped from my review queue due to lack of response...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-22 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-12 16:50 [PATCH 5.10/5.15] jfs: add check if log->bdev is NULL in lbmStartIO() Mikhail Ukhin
2024-01-12 19:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-01-22 17:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024012246-passable-delegate-5528@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ancowi69@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=iwanov-23@bk.ru \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=koshutin.pavel@yandex.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=mish.uxin2012@yandex.ru \
--cc=shaggy@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).