From: Bitao Hu <yaoma@linux.alibaba.com>
To: dianders@chromium.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
pmladek@suse.com, tglx@linutronix.de, maz@kernel.org,
liusong@linux.alibaba.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bitao Hu <yaoma@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] *** Detect interrupt storm in softlockup ***
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:12:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240123121223.22318-1-yaoma@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
Hi guys,
I have previously encountered an issue where an NVMe interrupt
storm caused a softlockup, but the call tree did not provide useful
information. This is because the call tree is merely a snapshot and
does not fully reflect the CPU's state over the duration of the
softlockup_thresh period. Consequently, I think that reporting CPU
utilization (system, softirq, hardirq, idle) during a softlockup would
be beneficial for identifying issues related to interrupt storms, as
well as assisting in the analysis of other causes of softlockup.
Furthermore, reporting the most time-consuming hardirqs during a
softlockup could directly pinpoint which interrupt is responsible
for the issue.
Bitao Hu (3):
watchdog/softlockup: low-overhead detection of interrupt storm
watchdog/softlockup: report the most time-consuming hardirq
watchdog/softlockup: add parameter to control the reporting of
time-consuming hardirq
include/linux/irq.h | 9 ++
include/linux/irqdesc.h | 2 +
kernel/irq/irqdesc.c | 9 +-
kernel/watchdog.c | 289 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 308 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1)
next reply other threads:[~2024-01-23 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-23 12:12 Bitao Hu [this message]
2024-01-23 12:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] watchdog/softlockup: low-overhead detection of interrupt storm Bitao Hu
2024-01-24 1:43 ` Liu Song
2024-01-24 2:48 ` yaoma
2024-01-25 0:19 ` Doug Anderson
2024-01-25 8:31 ` Bitao Hu
2024-01-25 15:08 ` Doug Anderson
2024-01-26 5:25 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-23 12:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] watchdog/softlockup: report the most time-consuming hardirq Bitao Hu
2024-01-25 0:19 ` Doug Anderson
2024-01-25 7:50 ` Bitao Hu
2024-01-25 9:19 ` Bitao Hu
2024-02-14 23:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-14 23:39 ` Doug Anderson
2024-02-15 1:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-23 12:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] watchdog/softlockup: add parameter to control the reporting of " Bitao Hu
2024-01-26 5:25 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-26 6:07 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240123121223.22318-1-yaoma@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=yaoma@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liusong@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox