* [PATCH V1 0/2] Refactor phy powerup sequence @ 2024-01-12 15:33 Nitin Rawat 2024-01-12 15:33 ` [PATCH V1 1/2] scsi: ufs: qcom : Refactor phy_power_on/off calls Nitin Rawat 2024-01-12 15:33 ` [PATCH V1 2/2] phy: qcom: Refactor phy_power_on and phy_calibrate callbacks Nitin Rawat 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Nitin Rawat @ 2024-01-12 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Vinod Koul, Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Manivannan Sadhasivam, James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen, Philipp Zabel Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-phy, linux-kernel, linux-scsi, Nitin Rawat Refactor phy_power_on and phy_calibrate callbacks. In Current code regulators enable, clks enable, calibrating UFS PHY, start_serdes and polling PCS_ready_status are part of phy_power_on. UFS PHY registers are retained after power collapse, meaning calibrating UFS PHY, start_serdes and polling PCS_ready_status can be done only when hba is powered_on, and not needed every time when phy_power_on is called during resume. Hence keep the code which enables PHY's regulators & clks in phy_power_on and move the rest steps into phy_calibrate function. Since phy_power_on is separated out from phy calibrate, make separate calls to phy_power_on and phy_calibrate calls from ufs qcom driver. Also for better power saving, remove the phy_power_on/off calls from resume/suspend path and put them to ufs_qcom_setup_clocks, so that PHY's regulators & clks can be turned on/off along with UFS's clocks. This patch series is tested on SM8550 MTP, SM8350 MTP and SA8775p. There is functional dependency between ufs-qcom and phy-qcom-qmp-ufs and hence both the patches should be part of same merge window. Nitin Rawat (2): scsi: ufs: qcom : Refactor phy_power_on/off calls phy: qcom: Refactor phy_power_on and phy_calibrate callbacks drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c | 183 +++++++++--------------- drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 104 +++++++++----- drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h | 4 + 3 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-) -- 2.43.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V1 1/2] scsi: ufs: qcom : Refactor phy_power_on/off calls 2024-01-12 15:33 [PATCH V1 0/2] Refactor phy powerup sequence Nitin Rawat @ 2024-01-12 15:33 ` Nitin Rawat 2024-01-12 22:28 ` Konrad Dybcio 2024-01-24 8:22 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2024-01-12 15:33 ` [PATCH V1 2/2] phy: qcom: Refactor phy_power_on and phy_calibrate callbacks Nitin Rawat 1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Nitin Rawat @ 2024-01-12 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Vinod Koul, Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Manivannan Sadhasivam, James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen, Philipp Zabel Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-phy, linux-kernel, linux-scsi, Nitin Rawat, Can Guo, Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli Commit 3f6d1767b1a0 ("phy: ufs-qcom: Refactor all init steps into phy_poweron") removes the phy_power_on/off from ufs_qcom_setup_clocks to suspend/resume func. To have a better power saving, remove the phy_power_on/off calls from resume/suspend path and put them back to ufs_qcom_setup_clocks, so that PHY's regulators & clks can be turned on/off along with UFS's clocks. Since phy phy_power_on is separated out from phy calibrate, make separate calls to phy_power_on and phy_calibrate calls from ufs qcom driver. Also add a mutex lock to protect the usage of is_phy_pwr_on against possible racing. Co-developed-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com> Co-developed-by: Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli <quic_narepall@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli <quic_narepall@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com> --- drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------- drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h | 4 ++ 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c index 39eef470f8fa..2721a30f0db8 100644 --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c @@ -338,6 +338,46 @@ static u32 ufs_qcom_get_hs_gear(struct ufs_hba *hba) return UFS_HS_G3; } +static int ufs_qcom_phy_power_on(struct ufs_hba *hba) +{ + struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); + struct phy *phy = host->generic_phy; + int ret = 0; + + mutex_lock(&host->phy_mutex); + if (!host->is_phy_pwr_on) { + ret = phy_power_on(phy); + if (ret) { + mutex_unlock(&host->phy_mutex); + return ret; + } + host->is_phy_pwr_on = true; + } + mutex_unlock(&host->phy_mutex); + + return ret; +} + +static int ufs_qcom_phy_power_off(struct ufs_hba *hba) +{ + struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); + struct phy *phy = host->generic_phy; + int ret = 0; + + mutex_lock(&host->phy_mutex); + if (host->is_phy_pwr_on) { + ret = phy_power_off(phy); + if (ret) { + mutex_unlock(&host->phy_mutex); + return ret; + } + host->is_phy_pwr_on = false; + } + mutex_unlock(&host->phy_mutex); + + return ret; +} + static int ufs_qcom_power_up_sequence(struct ufs_hba *hba) { struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); @@ -378,13 +418,18 @@ static int ufs_qcom_power_up_sequence(struct ufs_hba *hba) goto out_disable_phy; /* power on phy - start serdes and phy's power and clocks */ - ret = phy_power_on(phy); + ret = ufs_qcom_phy_power_on(hba); if (ret) { dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: phy power on failed, ret = %d\n", __func__, ret); goto out_disable_phy; } + ret = phy_calibrate(phy); + if (ret) { + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Failed to calibrate PHY %d\n", + __func__, ret); + } ufs_qcom_select_unipro_mode(host); return 0; @@ -557,26 +602,17 @@ static int ufs_qcom_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op, enum ufs_notify_change_status status) { struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); - struct phy *phy = host->generic_phy; if (status == PRE_CHANGE) return 0; - if (ufs_qcom_is_link_off(hba)) { - /* - * Disable the tx/rx lane symbol clocks before PHY is - * powered down as the PLL source should be disabled - * after downstream clocks are disabled. - */ + if (!ufs_qcom_is_link_active(hba)) ufs_qcom_disable_lane_clks(host); - phy_power_off(phy); - /* reset the connected UFS device during power down */ - ufs_qcom_device_reset_ctrl(hba, true); - } else if (!ufs_qcom_is_link_active(hba)) { - ufs_qcom_disable_lane_clks(host); - } + /* reset the connected UFS device during power down */ + if (ufs_qcom_is_link_off(hba) && host->device_reset) + ufs_qcom_device_reset_ctrl(hba, true); return ufs_qcom_ice_suspend(host); } @@ -584,26 +620,11 @@ static int ufs_qcom_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op, static int ufs_qcom_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op) { struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); - struct phy *phy = host->generic_phy; int err; - if (ufs_qcom_is_link_off(hba)) { - err = phy_power_on(phy); - if (err) { - dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: failed PHY power on: %d\n", - __func__, err); - return err; - } - - err = ufs_qcom_enable_lane_clks(host); - if (err) - return err; - - } else if (!ufs_qcom_is_link_active(hba)) { - err = ufs_qcom_enable_lane_clks(host); - if (err) - return err; - } + err = ufs_qcom_enable_lane_clks(host); + if (err) + return err; return ufs_qcom_ice_resume(host); } @@ -908,6 +929,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_setup_clocks(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool on, enum ufs_notify_change_status status) { struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); + int err; /* * In case ufs_qcom_init() is not yet done, simply ignore. @@ -926,10 +948,22 @@ static int ufs_qcom_setup_clocks(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool on, /* disable device ref_clk */ ufs_qcom_dev_ref_clk_ctrl(host, false); } + err = ufs_qcom_phy_power_off(hba); + if (err) { + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: phy power off failed, ret=%d\n", + __func__, err); + return err; + } } break; case POST_CHANGE: if (on) { + err = ufs_qcom_phy_power_on(hba); + if (err) { + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: phy power on failed, ret = %d\n", + __func__, err); + return err; + } /* enable the device ref clock for HS mode*/ if (ufshcd_is_hs_mode(&hba->pwr_info)) ufs_qcom_dev_ref_clk_ctrl(host, true); @@ -1110,7 +1144,7 @@ static void ufs_qcom_exit(struct ufs_hba *hba) struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); ufs_qcom_disable_lane_clks(host); - phy_power_off(host->generic_phy); + ufs_qcom_phy_power_off(hba); phy_exit(host->generic_phy); } @@ -1536,9 +1570,7 @@ static void ufs_qcom_config_scaling_param(struct ufs_hba *hba, static void ufs_qcom_reinit_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba) { - struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); - - phy_power_off(host->generic_phy); + ufs_qcom_phy_power_off(hba); } /* Resources */ diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h index 9dd9a391ebb7..241dba01672e 100644 --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h @@ -215,6 +215,10 @@ struct ufs_qcom_host { u32 phy_gear; bool esi_enabled; + /* flag to check if phy is powered on */ + bool is_phy_pwr_on; + /* Protect the usage of is_phy_pwr_on against racing */ + struct mutex phy_mutex; }; static inline u32 -- 2.43.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V1 1/2] scsi: ufs: qcom : Refactor phy_power_on/off calls 2024-01-12 15:33 ` [PATCH V1 1/2] scsi: ufs: qcom : Refactor phy_power_on/off calls Nitin Rawat @ 2024-01-12 22:28 ` Konrad Dybcio 2024-01-24 8:22 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Konrad Dybcio @ 2024-01-12 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nitin Rawat, Bjorn Andersson, Vinod Koul, Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Manivannan Sadhasivam, James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen, Philipp Zabel Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-phy, linux-kernel, linux-scsi, Can Guo, Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli On 12.01.2024 16:33, Nitin Rawat wrote: > Commit 3f6d1767b1a0 ("phy: ufs-qcom: Refactor all init steps into > phy_poweron") removes the phy_power_on/off from ufs_qcom_setup_clocks > to suspend/resume func. > > To have a better power saving, remove the phy_power_on/off calls from > resume/suspend path and put them back to ufs_qcom_setup_clocks, so that > PHY's regulators & clks can be turned on/off along with UFS's clocks. > > Since phy phy_power_on is separated out from phy calibrate, make > separate calls to phy_power_on and phy_calibrate calls from ufs qcom > driver. > > Also add a mutex lock to protect the usage of is_phy_pwr_on against > possible racing. > > Co-developed-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com> > Co-developed-by: Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli <quic_narepall@quicinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli <quic_narepall@quicinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com> > --- > drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h | 4 ++ > 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c > index 39eef470f8fa..2721a30f0db8 100644 > --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c > +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c > @@ -338,6 +338,46 @@ static u32 ufs_qcom_get_hs_gear(struct ufs_hba *hba) > return UFS_HS_G3; > } > > +static int ufs_qcom_phy_power_on(struct ufs_hba *hba) > +{ > + struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > + struct phy *phy = host->generic_phy; > + int ret = 0; > + > + mutex_lock(&host->phy_mutex); guard(mutex)(&host->phy_mutex); and you can drop the _unlock calls > + if (!host->is_phy_pwr_on) { > + ret = phy_power_on(phy); > + if (ret) { > + mutex_unlock(&host->phy_mutex); > + return ret; And with the _unlock now being unnecessary, you can rewrite this as: if (!host->is_phy_pwr_on) { ret = phy_power_on(phy); if (!ret) host->is_phy_pwr_on = true; } return ret > + } > + host->is_phy_pwr_on = true; > + } > + mutex_unlock(&host->phy_mutex); > + > + return ret; > +} [...] > static int ufs_qcom_power_up_sequence(struct ufs_hba *hba) > { > struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > @@ -378,13 +418,18 @@ static int ufs_qcom_power_up_sequence(struct ufs_hba *hba) > goto out_disable_phy; > > /* power on phy - start serdes and phy's power and clocks */ > - ret = phy_power_on(phy); > + ret = ufs_qcom_phy_power_on(hba); > if (ret) { > dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: phy power on failed, ret = %d\n", > __func__, ret); > goto out_disable_phy; > } > > + ret = phy_calibrate(phy); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Failed to calibrate PHY %d\n", > + __func__, ret); > + } You can drop the overly verbose __func__, unwrap the line and remove the curly braces, similar for dev_err-s below Actually, shouldn't this error out if calibrate fails?? Konrad ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V1 1/2] scsi: ufs: qcom : Refactor phy_power_on/off calls 2024-01-12 15:33 ` [PATCH V1 1/2] scsi: ufs: qcom : Refactor phy_power_on/off calls Nitin Rawat 2024-01-12 22:28 ` Konrad Dybcio @ 2024-01-24 8:22 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Manivannan Sadhasivam @ 2024-01-24 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nitin Rawat Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Vinod Koul, Kishon Vijay Abraham I, James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen, Philipp Zabel, linux-arm-msm, linux-phy, linux-kernel, linux-scsi, Can Guo, Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 09:03:47PM +0530, Nitin Rawat wrote: > Commit 3f6d1767b1a0 ("phy: ufs-qcom: Refactor all init steps into > phy_poweron") removes the phy_power_on/off from ufs_qcom_setup_clocks s/removes/moved > to suspend/resume func. > > To have a better power saving, remove the phy_power_on/off calls from > resume/suspend path and put them back to ufs_qcom_setup_clocks, so that > PHY's regulators & clks can be turned on/off along with UFS's clocks. > > Since phy phy_power_on is separated out from phy calibrate, make > separate calls to phy_power_on and phy_calibrate calls from ufs qcom > driver. > Above change should be in a separate patch. > Also add a mutex lock to protect the usage of is_phy_pwr_on against > possible racing. > > Co-developed-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com> > Co-developed-by: Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli <quic_narepall@quicinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli <quic_narepall@quicinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com> > --- > drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h | 4 ++ > 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c > index 39eef470f8fa..2721a30f0db8 100644 > --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c > +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c > @@ -338,6 +338,46 @@ static u32 ufs_qcom_get_hs_gear(struct ufs_hba *hba) > return UFS_HS_G3; > } > > +static int ufs_qcom_phy_power_on(struct ufs_hba *hba) > +{ > + struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > + struct phy *phy = host->generic_phy; > + int ret = 0; > + > + mutex_lock(&host->phy_mutex); You do not need mutex to protect a variable. If you want to ensure that the access to the flag is atomic, you can use test_and_{set/clear}_bit helpers. > + if (!host->is_phy_pwr_on) { > + ret = phy_power_on(phy); > + if (ret) { > + mutex_unlock(&host->phy_mutex); > + return ret; > + } > + host->is_phy_pwr_on = true; > + } > + mutex_unlock(&host->phy_mutex); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int ufs_qcom_phy_power_off(struct ufs_hba *hba) > +{ > + struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > + struct phy *phy = host->generic_phy; > + int ret = 0; > + > + mutex_lock(&host->phy_mutex); > + if (host->is_phy_pwr_on) { > + ret = phy_power_off(phy); > + if (ret) { > + mutex_unlock(&host->phy_mutex); > + return ret; > + } > + host->is_phy_pwr_on = false; > + } > + mutex_unlock(&host->phy_mutex); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > static int ufs_qcom_power_up_sequence(struct ufs_hba *hba) > { > struct ufs_qcom_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > @@ -378,13 +418,18 @@ static int ufs_qcom_power_up_sequence(struct ufs_hba *hba) > goto out_disable_phy; > > /* power on phy - start serdes and phy's power and clocks */ > - ret = phy_power_on(phy); > + ret = ufs_qcom_phy_power_on(hba); > if (ret) { > dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: phy power on failed, ret = %d\n", > __func__, ret); > goto out_disable_phy; > } > > + ret = phy_calibrate(phy); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: Failed to calibrate PHY %d\n", > + __func__, ret); Even though the driver already has a lot of "__func__" to print the function names in error log, please do not add more. I will get rid of the existing ones at some point. - Mani -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம் ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V1 2/2] phy: qcom: Refactor phy_power_on and phy_calibrate callbacks 2024-01-12 15:33 [PATCH V1 0/2] Refactor phy powerup sequence Nitin Rawat 2024-01-12 15:33 ` [PATCH V1 1/2] scsi: ufs: qcom : Refactor phy_power_on/off calls Nitin Rawat @ 2024-01-12 15:33 ` Nitin Rawat 2024-01-24 5:37 ` Vinod Koul 2024-01-24 8:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Nitin Rawat @ 2024-01-12 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Vinod Koul, Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Manivannan Sadhasivam, James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen, Philipp Zabel Cc: linux-arm-msm, linux-phy, linux-kernel, linux-scsi, Nitin Rawat, Can Guo, Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli Commit 052553af6a31 ("ufs/phy: qcom: Refactor to use phy_init call") puts enabling regulators & clks, calibrating UFS PHY, starting serdes and polling PCS ready status into phy_power_on. In Current code regulators enable, clks enable, calibrating UFS PHY, start_serdes and polling PCS_ready_status are part of phy_power_on. UFS PHY registers are retained after power collapse, meaning calibrating UFS PHY, start_serdes and polling PCS_ready_status can be done only when hba is powered_on, and not needed every time when phy_power_on is called during resume. Hence keep the code which enables PHY's regulators & clks in phy_power_on and move the rest steps into phy_calibrate function. Refactor the code to enable PHY regulators & clks in phy_power_on and move rest of the code to phy_calibrate function. Co-developed-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com> Co-developed-by: Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli <quic_narepall@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli <quic_narepall@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com> --- drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c | 183 +++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 116 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c index 3c2e6255e26f..ae0218738b0b 100644 --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c @@ -32,14 +32,15 @@ /* QPHY_SW_RESET bit */ #define SW_RESET BIT(0) /* QPHY_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL */ -#define SW_PWRDN BIT(0) +#define SW_PWRUP BIT(0) +#define SW_PWRDN 0 /* QPHY_START_CONTROL bits */ #define SERDES_START BIT(0) #define PCS_START BIT(1) /* QPHY_PCS_READY_STATUS bit */ #define PCS_READY BIT(0) -#define PHY_INIT_COMPLETE_TIMEOUT 10000 +#define PHY_INIT_COMPLETE_TIMEOUT 1000000 struct qmp_phy_init_tbl { unsigned int offset; @@ -1464,8 +1465,25 @@ static void qmp_ufs_init_registers(struct qmp_ufs *qmp, const struct qmp_phy_cfg qmp_ufs_pcs_init(qmp, &cfg->tbls_hs_g4); } -static int qmp_ufs_com_init(struct qmp_ufs *qmp) +static int qmp_ufs_power_off(struct phy *phy) +{ + struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy); + const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; + + /* Put PHY into POWER DOWN state: active low */ + qphy_clrbits(qmp->pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL], + SW_PWRDN); + + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(cfg->num_clks, qmp->clks); + + regulator_bulk_disable(cfg->num_vregs, qmp->vregs); + + return 0; +} + +static int qmp_ufs_power_on(struct phy *phy) { + struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy); const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; void __iomem *pcs = qmp->pcs; int ret; @@ -1480,8 +1498,7 @@ static int qmp_ufs_com_init(struct qmp_ufs *qmp) if (ret) goto err_disable_regulators; - qphy_setbits(pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL], SW_PWRDN); - + qphy_setbits(pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL], SW_PWRUP); return 0; err_disable_regulators: @@ -1490,61 +1507,7 @@ static int qmp_ufs_com_init(struct qmp_ufs *qmp) return ret; } -static int qmp_ufs_com_exit(struct qmp_ufs *qmp) -{ - const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; - - reset_control_assert(qmp->ufs_reset); - - clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(cfg->num_clks, qmp->clks); - - regulator_bulk_disable(cfg->num_vregs, qmp->vregs); - - return 0; -} - -static int qmp_ufs_init(struct phy *phy) -{ - struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy); - const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; - int ret; - dev_vdbg(qmp->dev, "Initializing QMP phy\n"); - - if (cfg->no_pcs_sw_reset) { - /* - * Get UFS reset, which is delayed until now to avoid a - * circular dependency where UFS needs its PHY, but the PHY - * needs this UFS reset. - */ - if (!qmp->ufs_reset) { - qmp->ufs_reset = - devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(qmp->dev, - "ufsphy"); - - if (IS_ERR(qmp->ufs_reset)) { - ret = PTR_ERR(qmp->ufs_reset); - dev_err(qmp->dev, - "failed to get UFS reset: %d\n", - ret); - - qmp->ufs_reset = NULL; - return ret; - } - } - - ret = reset_control_assert(qmp->ufs_reset); - if (ret) - return ret; - } - - ret = qmp_ufs_com_init(qmp); - if (ret) - return ret; - - return 0; -} - -static int qmp_ufs_power_on(struct phy *phy) +static int qmp_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy) { struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy); const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; @@ -1553,11 +1516,21 @@ static int qmp_ufs_power_on(struct phy *phy) unsigned int val; int ret; + qphy_setbits(pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL], SW_PWRUP); + + ret = reset_control_assert(qmp->ufs_reset); + if (ret) { + dev_err(qmp->dev, "Failed to assert UFS PHY reset %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + qmp_ufs_init_registers(qmp, cfg); ret = reset_control_deassert(qmp->ufs_reset); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + dev_err(qmp->dev, "Failed to deassert UFS PHY reset %d\n", ret); return ret; + } /* Pull PHY out of reset state */ if (!cfg->no_pcs_sw_reset) @@ -1577,59 +1550,6 @@ static int qmp_ufs_power_on(struct phy *phy) return 0; } -static int qmp_ufs_power_off(struct phy *phy) -{ - struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy); - const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; - - /* PHY reset */ - if (!cfg->no_pcs_sw_reset) - qphy_setbits(qmp->pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_SW_RESET], SW_RESET); - - /* stop SerDes */ - qphy_clrbits(qmp->pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_START_CTRL], SERDES_START); - - /* Put PHY into POWER DOWN state: active low */ - qphy_clrbits(qmp->pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL], - SW_PWRDN); - - return 0; -} - -static int qmp_ufs_exit(struct phy *phy) -{ - struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy); - - qmp_ufs_com_exit(qmp); - - return 0; -} - -static int qmp_ufs_enable(struct phy *phy) -{ - int ret; - - ret = qmp_ufs_init(phy); - if (ret) - return ret; - - ret = qmp_ufs_power_on(phy); - if (ret) - qmp_ufs_exit(phy); - - return ret; -} - -static int qmp_ufs_disable(struct phy *phy) -{ - int ret; - - ret = qmp_ufs_power_off(phy); - if (ret) - return ret; - return qmp_ufs_exit(phy); -} - static int qmp_ufs_set_mode(struct phy *phy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode) { struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy); @@ -1641,9 +1561,10 @@ static int qmp_ufs_set_mode(struct phy *phy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode) } static const struct phy_ops qcom_qmp_ufs_phy_ops = { - .power_on = qmp_ufs_enable, - .power_off = qmp_ufs_disable, + .power_on = qmp_ufs_power_on, + .power_off = qmp_ufs_power_off, .set_mode = qmp_ufs_set_mode, + .calibrate = qmp_ufs_phy_calibrate, .owner = THIS_MODULE, }; @@ -1809,6 +1730,32 @@ static int qmp_ufs_parse_dt(struct qmp_ufs *qmp) return 0; } +static int qmp_ufs_get_phy_reset(struct qmp_ufs *qmp) +{ + const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; + int ret; + + if (!cfg->no_pcs_sw_reset) + return 0; + + /* + * Get UFS reset, which is delayed until now to avoid a + * circular dependency where UFS needs its PHY, but the PHY + * needs this UFS reset. + */ + + qmp->ufs_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(qmp->dev, + "ufsphy"); + if (IS_ERR(qmp->ufs_reset)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(qmp->ufs_reset); + dev_err(qmp->dev, "failed to get UFS reset: %d\n", ret); + qmp->ufs_reset = NULL; + return ret; + } + + return 0; +} + static int qmp_ufs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; @@ -1835,6 +1782,10 @@ static int qmp_ufs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (ret) return ret; + ret = qmp_ufs_get_phy_reset(qmp); + if (ret) + return ret; + /* Check for legacy binding with child node. */ np = of_get_next_available_child(dev->of_node, NULL); if (np) { -- 2.43.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V1 2/2] phy: qcom: Refactor phy_power_on and phy_calibrate callbacks 2024-01-12 15:33 ` [PATCH V1 2/2] phy: qcom: Refactor phy_power_on and phy_calibrate callbacks Nitin Rawat @ 2024-01-24 5:37 ` Vinod Koul 2024-01-24 8:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Vinod Koul @ 2024-01-24 5:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nitin Rawat Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Manivannan Sadhasivam, James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen, Philipp Zabel, linux-arm-msm, linux-phy, linux-kernel, linux-scsi, Can Guo, Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli On 12-01-24, 21:03, Nitin Rawat wrote: > Commit 052553af6a31 ("ufs/phy: qcom: Refactor to use phy_init call") > puts enabling regulators & clks, calibrating UFS PHY, starting serdes > and polling PCS ready status into phy_power_on. > > In Current code regulators enable, clks enable, calibrating UFS PHY, > start_serdes and polling PCS_ready_status are part of phy_power_on. > > UFS PHY registers are retained after power collapse, meaning calibrating > UFS PHY, start_serdes and polling PCS_ready_status can be done only when > hba is powered_on, and not needed every time when phy_power_on is called > during resume. Hence keep the code which enables PHY's regulators & clks > in phy_power_on and move the rest steps into phy_calibrate function. > > Refactor the code to enable PHY regulators & clks in phy_power_on and > move rest of the code to phy_calibrate function. > > Co-developed-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com> > Co-developed-by: Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli <quic_narepall@quicinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli <quic_narepall@quicinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com> > --- > drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c | 183 +++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 116 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c > index 3c2e6255e26f..ae0218738b0b 100644 > --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c > +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c > @@ -32,14 +32,15 @@ > /* QPHY_SW_RESET bit */ > #define SW_RESET BIT(0) > /* QPHY_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL */ > -#define SW_PWRDN BIT(0) > +#define SW_PWRUP BIT(0) > +#define SW_PWRDN 0 why change this? so which bit is for PWR control, it is still bit 0 right? > /* QPHY_START_CONTROL bits */ > #define SERDES_START BIT(0) > #define PCS_START BIT(1) > /* QPHY_PCS_READY_STATUS bit */ > #define PCS_READY BIT(0) > > -#define PHY_INIT_COMPLETE_TIMEOUT 10000 > +#define PHY_INIT_COMPLETE_TIMEOUT 1000000 why change timeout? this should be explained in log, even better a individual patch explaining why this was changed > > struct qmp_phy_init_tbl { > unsigned int offset; > @@ -1464,8 +1465,25 @@ static void qmp_ufs_init_registers(struct qmp_ufs *qmp, const struct qmp_phy_cfg > qmp_ufs_pcs_init(qmp, &cfg->tbls_hs_g4); > } > > -static int qmp_ufs_com_init(struct qmp_ufs *qmp) > +static int qmp_ufs_power_off(struct phy *phy) > +{ > + struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > + const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; > + > + /* Put PHY into POWER DOWN state: active low */ > + qphy_clrbits(qmp->pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL], > + SW_PWRDN); this will clear the bit, i think you are interpreting this as right which this is not > + > + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(cfg->num_clks, qmp->clks); > + > + regulator_bulk_disable(cfg->num_vregs, qmp->vregs); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int qmp_ufs_power_on(struct phy *phy) > { > + struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; > void __iomem *pcs = qmp->pcs; > int ret; > @@ -1480,8 +1498,7 @@ static int qmp_ufs_com_init(struct qmp_ufs *qmp) > if (ret) > goto err_disable_regulators; > > - qphy_setbits(pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL], SW_PWRDN); > - > + qphy_setbits(pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL], SW_PWRUP); > return 0; > > err_disable_regulators: > @@ -1490,61 +1507,7 @@ static int qmp_ufs_com_init(struct qmp_ufs *qmp) > return ret; > } > > -static int qmp_ufs_com_exit(struct qmp_ufs *qmp) > -{ > - const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; > - > - reset_control_assert(qmp->ufs_reset); > - > - clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(cfg->num_clks, qmp->clks); > - > - regulator_bulk_disable(cfg->num_vregs, qmp->vregs); > - > - return 0; > -} > - > -static int qmp_ufs_init(struct phy *phy) > -{ > - struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > - const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; > - int ret; > - dev_vdbg(qmp->dev, "Initializing QMP phy\n"); > - > - if (cfg->no_pcs_sw_reset) { > - /* > - * Get UFS reset, which is delayed until now to avoid a > - * circular dependency where UFS needs its PHY, but the PHY > - * needs this UFS reset. > - */ > - if (!qmp->ufs_reset) { > - qmp->ufs_reset = > - devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(qmp->dev, > - "ufsphy"); > - > - if (IS_ERR(qmp->ufs_reset)) { > - ret = PTR_ERR(qmp->ufs_reset); > - dev_err(qmp->dev, > - "failed to get UFS reset: %d\n", > - ret); > - > - qmp->ufs_reset = NULL; > - return ret; > - } > - } > - > - ret = reset_control_assert(qmp->ufs_reset); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > - } > - > - ret = qmp_ufs_com_init(qmp); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > - > - return 0; > -} > - > -static int qmp_ufs_power_on(struct phy *phy) > +static int qmp_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy) > { > struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; > @@ -1553,11 +1516,21 @@ static int qmp_ufs_power_on(struct phy *phy) > unsigned int val; > int ret; > > + qphy_setbits(pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL], SW_PWRUP); > + > + ret = reset_control_assert(qmp->ufs_reset); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(qmp->dev, "Failed to assert UFS PHY reset %d\n", ret); > + return ret; > + } > + > qmp_ufs_init_registers(qmp, cfg); > > ret = reset_control_deassert(qmp->ufs_reset); > - if (ret) > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(qmp->dev, "Failed to deassert UFS PHY reset %d\n", ret); > return ret; > + } > > /* Pull PHY out of reset state */ > if (!cfg->no_pcs_sw_reset) > @@ -1577,59 +1550,6 @@ static int qmp_ufs_power_on(struct phy *phy) > return 0; > } > > -static int qmp_ufs_power_off(struct phy *phy) > -{ > - struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > - const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; > - > - /* PHY reset */ > - if (!cfg->no_pcs_sw_reset) > - qphy_setbits(qmp->pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_SW_RESET], SW_RESET); > - > - /* stop SerDes */ > - qphy_clrbits(qmp->pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_START_CTRL], SERDES_START); > - > - /* Put PHY into POWER DOWN state: active low */ > - qphy_clrbits(qmp->pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL], > - SW_PWRDN); > - > - return 0; > -} > - > -static int qmp_ufs_exit(struct phy *phy) > -{ > - struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > - > - qmp_ufs_com_exit(qmp); > - > - return 0; > -} > - > -static int qmp_ufs_enable(struct phy *phy) > -{ > - int ret; > - > - ret = qmp_ufs_init(phy); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > - > - ret = qmp_ufs_power_on(phy); > - if (ret) > - qmp_ufs_exit(phy); > - > - return ret; > -} > - > -static int qmp_ufs_disable(struct phy *phy) > -{ > - int ret; > - > - ret = qmp_ufs_power_off(phy); > - if (ret) > - return ret; > - return qmp_ufs_exit(phy); > -} > - > static int qmp_ufs_set_mode(struct phy *phy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode) > { > struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > @@ -1641,9 +1561,10 @@ static int qmp_ufs_set_mode(struct phy *phy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode) > } > > static const struct phy_ops qcom_qmp_ufs_phy_ops = { > - .power_on = qmp_ufs_enable, > - .power_off = qmp_ufs_disable, > + .power_on = qmp_ufs_power_on, > + .power_off = qmp_ufs_power_off, > .set_mode = qmp_ufs_set_mode, > + .calibrate = qmp_ufs_phy_calibrate, > .owner = THIS_MODULE, > }; > > @@ -1809,6 +1730,32 @@ static int qmp_ufs_parse_dt(struct qmp_ufs *qmp) > return 0; > } > > +static int qmp_ufs_get_phy_reset(struct qmp_ufs *qmp) > +{ > + const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; > + int ret; > + > + if (!cfg->no_pcs_sw_reset) > + return 0; > + > + /* > + * Get UFS reset, which is delayed until now to avoid a > + * circular dependency where UFS needs its PHY, but the PHY > + * needs this UFS reset. > + */ > + > + qmp->ufs_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(qmp->dev, > + "ufsphy"); > + if (IS_ERR(qmp->ufs_reset)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(qmp->ufs_reset); > + dev_err(qmp->dev, "failed to get UFS reset: %d\n", ret); > + qmp->ufs_reset = NULL; > + return ret; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int qmp_ufs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > @@ -1835,6 +1782,10 @@ static int qmp_ufs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (ret) > return ret; > > + ret = qmp_ufs_get_phy_reset(qmp); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + I think this patch should be split to moving code around to helper fn and then add logic for moving power up/down calls, pls dont mix everything in single patch > /* Check for legacy binding with child node. */ > np = of_get_next_available_child(dev->of_node, NULL); > if (np) { > -- > 2.43.0 -- ~Vinod ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V1 2/2] phy: qcom: Refactor phy_power_on and phy_calibrate callbacks 2024-01-12 15:33 ` [PATCH V1 2/2] phy: qcom: Refactor phy_power_on and phy_calibrate callbacks Nitin Rawat 2024-01-24 5:37 ` Vinod Koul @ 2024-01-24 8:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Manivannan Sadhasivam @ 2024-01-24 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nitin Rawat Cc: Bjorn Andersson, Konrad Dybcio, Vinod Koul, Kishon Vijay Abraham I, James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen, Philipp Zabel, linux-arm-msm, linux-phy, linux-kernel, linux-scsi, Can Guo, Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 09:03:48PM +0530, Nitin Rawat wrote: > Commit 052553af6a31 ("ufs/phy: qcom: Refactor to use phy_init call") > puts enabling regulators & clks, calibrating UFS PHY, starting serdes > and polling PCS ready status into phy_power_on. > > In Current code regulators enable, clks enable, calibrating UFS PHY, > start_serdes and polling PCS_ready_status are part of phy_power_on. > > UFS PHY registers are retained after power collapse, meaning calibrating > UFS PHY, start_serdes and polling PCS_ready_status can be done only when > hba is powered_on, and not needed every time when phy_power_on is called > during resume. Hence keep the code which enables PHY's regulators & clks > in phy_power_on and move the rest steps into phy_calibrate function. > > Refactor the code to enable PHY regulators & clks in phy_power_on and > move rest of the code to phy_calibrate function. > This patch should come before UFS patch since you are introducing the calibrate() callback here only. > Co-developed-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com> > Co-developed-by: Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli <quic_narepall@quicinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli <quic_narepall@quicinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com> > --- > drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c | 183 +++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 116 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c > index 3c2e6255e26f..ae0218738b0b 100644 > --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c > +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c > @@ -32,14 +32,15 @@ > /* QPHY_SW_RESET bit */ > #define SW_RESET BIT(0) > /* QPHY_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL */ > -#define SW_PWRDN BIT(0) > +#define SW_PWRUP BIT(0) > +#define SW_PWRDN 0 Why 0? > /* QPHY_START_CONTROL bits */ > #define SERDES_START BIT(0) > #define PCS_START BIT(1) > /* QPHY_PCS_READY_STATUS bit */ > #define PCS_READY BIT(0) > > -#define PHY_INIT_COMPLETE_TIMEOUT 10000 > +#define PHY_INIT_COMPLETE_TIMEOUT 1000000 Why? This is not mentioned in the commit message. If it is not related to this refactoring, then it should be a separate patch with justification. > > struct qmp_phy_init_tbl { > unsigned int offset; > @@ -1464,8 +1465,25 @@ static void qmp_ufs_init_registers(struct qmp_ufs *qmp, const struct qmp_phy_cfg > qmp_ufs_pcs_init(qmp, &cfg->tbls_hs_g4); > } > > -static int qmp_ufs_com_init(struct qmp_ufs *qmp) > +static int qmp_ufs_power_off(struct phy *phy) > +{ > + struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > + const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; > + > + /* Put PHY into POWER DOWN state: active low */ > + qphy_clrbits(qmp->pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL], > + SW_PWRDN); > + > + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(cfg->num_clks, qmp->clks); > + > + regulator_bulk_disable(cfg->num_vregs, qmp->vregs); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int qmp_ufs_power_on(struct phy *phy) > { > + struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; > void __iomem *pcs = qmp->pcs; > int ret; > @@ -1480,8 +1498,7 @@ static int qmp_ufs_com_init(struct qmp_ufs *qmp) > if (ret) > goto err_disable_regulators; > > - qphy_setbits(pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL], SW_PWRDN); > - > + qphy_setbits(pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL], SW_PWRUP); Newline please. As mentioned above, why can't you use existing SW_PWRDN macro. > return 0; > > err_disable_regulators: > @@ -1490,61 +1507,7 @@ static int qmp_ufs_com_init(struct qmp_ufs *qmp) > return ret; > } > [...] > +static int qmp_ufs_get_phy_reset(struct qmp_ufs *qmp) > +{ > + const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg; > + int ret; > + > + if (!cfg->no_pcs_sw_reset) > + return 0; > + > + /* > + * Get UFS reset, which is delayed until now to avoid a > + * circular dependency where UFS needs its PHY, but the PHY > + * needs this UFS reset. > + */ > + > + qmp->ufs_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(qmp->dev, > + "ufsphy"); You have moved this to probe from power_on() without any justification. What about the circular dependency mentioned in the comment. - Mani -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம் ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-24 8:33 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-01-12 15:33 [PATCH V1 0/2] Refactor phy powerup sequence Nitin Rawat 2024-01-12 15:33 ` [PATCH V1 1/2] scsi: ufs: qcom : Refactor phy_power_on/off calls Nitin Rawat 2024-01-12 22:28 ` Konrad Dybcio 2024-01-24 8:22 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam 2024-01-12 15:33 ` [PATCH V1 2/2] phy: qcom: Refactor phy_power_on and phy_calibrate callbacks Nitin Rawat 2024-01-24 5:37 ` Vinod Koul 2024-01-24 8:33 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox