public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: jiangshanlai@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com,
	kernel-team@meta.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] workqueue: Make wq_adjust_max_active() round-robin pwqs while activating
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 07:05:58 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240125170628.2017784-6-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240125170628.2017784-1-tj@kernel.org>

wq_adjust_max_active() needs to activate work items after max_active is
increased. Previously, it did that by visiting each pwq once activating all
that could be activated. While this makes sense with per-pwq nr_active,
nr_active will be shared across multiple pwqs for unbound wqs. Then, we'd
want to round-robin through pwqs to be fairer.

In preparation, this patch makes wq_adjust_max_active() round-robin pwqs
while activating. While the activation ordering changes, this shouldn't
cause user-noticeable behavior changes.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 6a0ce3a3cca2..bfb6e951852a 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -4707,7 +4707,7 @@ static int init_rescuer(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
  */
 static void wq_adjust_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 {
-	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
+	bool activated;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);
 
@@ -4727,19 +4727,26 @@ static void wq_adjust_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 	 */
 	WRITE_ONCE(wq->max_active, wq->saved_max_active);
 
-	for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) {
-		unsigned long flags;
-
-		/* this function can be called during early boot w/ irq disabled */
-		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
-
-		while (pwq_activate_first_inactive(pwq))
-			;
+	/*
+	 * Round-robin through pwq's activating the first inactive work item
+	 * until max_active is filled.
+	 */
+	do {
+		struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
 
-		kick_pool(pwq->pool);
+		activated = false;
+		for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) {
+			unsigned long flags;
 
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
-	}
+			/* can be called during early boot w/ irq disabled */
+			raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
+			if (pwq_activate_first_inactive(pwq)) {
+				activated = true;
+				kick_pool(pwq->pool);
+			}
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
+		}
+	} while (activated);
 }
 
 __printf(1, 4)
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-25 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-25 17:05 [PATCHSET v3 wq/for-6.9] workqueue: Implement system-wide max_active for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2024-01-25 17:05 ` [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: Move pwq->max_active to wq->max_active Tejun Heo
2024-01-25 17:05 ` [PATCH 02/10] workqueue: Factor out pwq_is_empty() Tejun Heo
2024-01-25 17:05 ` [PATCH 03/10] workqueue: Replace pwq_activate_inactive_work() with [__]pwq_activate_work() Tejun Heo
2024-01-25 17:05 ` [PATCH 04/10] workqueue: Move nr_active handling into helpers Tejun Heo
2024-01-25 17:05 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-01-25 17:05 ` [PATCH 06/10] workqueue: RCU protect wq->dfl_pwq and implement accessors for it Tejun Heo
2024-01-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 07/10] workqueue: Move pwq_dec_nr_in_flight() to the end of work item handling Tejun Heo
2024-01-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 08/10] workqueue: Introduce struct wq_node_nr_active Tejun Heo
2024-01-29 16:02   ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-01-29 18:14     ` [PATCH v4 " Tejun Heo
2024-01-30 18:00       ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-31  4:04         ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 09/10] workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2024-01-29 16:00   ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-01-29 18:14     ` [PATCH v4 " Tejun Heo
2024-01-30 22:30       ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-01-31  4:02         ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-31  4:12           ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-31  4:13             ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-31  4:20               ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-31  4:24                 ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-31  4:42                   ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-01-31  5:01                     ` Tejun Heo
2024-01-31  7:45                       ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-01-31 21:52                   ` Mark Brown
2024-01-31  5:25           ` [PATCH wq/for-6.9] workqueue: Avoid premature init of wq->node_nr_active[].max Tejun Heo
2024-01-25 17:06 ` [PATCH 10/10] tools/workqueue/wq_dump.py: Add node_nr/max_active dump Tejun Heo
2024-01-29 16:07 ` [PATCHSET v3 wq/for-6.9] workqueue: Implement system-wide max_active for unbound workqueues Lai Jiangshan
2024-01-29 18:16   ` Tejun Heo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-12-20  7:24 [PATCHSET wq/for-6.8] " Tejun Heo
2023-12-20  7:24 ` [PATCH 05/10] workqueue: Make wq_adjust_max_active() round-robin pwqs while activating Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240125170628.2017784-6-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox