From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] cxl/pci: Rename DOE mailbox handle to doe_mb
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 16:07:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240126160725.00006dba@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240108114833.241710-2-rrichter@amd.com>
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 12:48:31 +0100
Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com> wrote:
> Trivial variable rename for the DOE mailbox handle from cdat_doe to
> doe_mb. The variable name cdat_doe is too ambiguous, use doe_mb that
> is commonly used for the mailbox.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
I don't feel strongly about this one either way, but I've probably spent
too long looking at this code in the past.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> index 6c9c8d92f8f7..89bab00bb291 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> @@ -518,14 +518,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_hdm_decode_init, CXL);
> FIELD_PREP(CXL_DOE_TABLE_ACCESS_ENTRY_HANDLE, (entry_handle)))
>
> static int cxl_cdat_get_length(struct device *dev,
> - struct pci_doe_mb *cdat_doe,
> + struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb,
> size_t *length)
> {
> __le32 request = CDAT_DOE_REQ(0);
> __le32 response[2];
> int rc;
>
> - rc = pci_doe(cdat_doe, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
> + rc = pci_doe(doe_mb, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
> CXL_DOE_PROTOCOL_TABLE_ACCESS,
> &request, sizeof(request),
> &response, sizeof(response));
> @@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static int cxl_cdat_get_length(struct device *dev,
> }
>
> static int cxl_cdat_read_table(struct device *dev,
> - struct pci_doe_mb *cdat_doe,
> + struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb,
> void *cdat_table, size_t *cdat_length)
> {
> size_t length = *cdat_length + sizeof(__le32);
> @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ static int cxl_cdat_read_table(struct device *dev,
> size_t entry_dw;
> int rc;
>
> - rc = pci_doe(cdat_doe, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
> + rc = pci_doe(doe_mb, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
> CXL_DOE_PROTOCOL_TABLE_ACCESS,
> &request, sizeof(request),
> data, length);
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ void read_cdat_data(struct cxl_port *port)
> {
> struct device *uport = port->uport_dev;
> struct device *dev = &port->dev;
> - struct pci_doe_mb *cdat_doe;
> + struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb;
> struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
> struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd;
> size_t cdat_length;
> @@ -638,16 +638,16 @@ void read_cdat_data(struct cxl_port *port)
> if (!pdev)
> return;
>
> - cdat_doe = pci_find_doe_mailbox(pdev, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
> - CXL_DOE_PROTOCOL_TABLE_ACCESS);
> - if (!cdat_doe) {
> + doe_mb = pci_find_doe_mailbox(pdev, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
> + CXL_DOE_PROTOCOL_TABLE_ACCESS);
> + if (!doe_mb) {
> dev_dbg(dev, "No CDAT mailbox\n");
> return;
> }
>
> port->cdat_available = true;
>
> - if (cxl_cdat_get_length(dev, cdat_doe, &cdat_length)) {
> + if (cxl_cdat_get_length(dev, doe_mb, &cdat_length)) {
> dev_dbg(dev, "No CDAT length\n");
> return;
> }
> @@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ void read_cdat_data(struct cxl_port *port)
> if (!cdat_buf)
> return;
>
> - rc = cxl_cdat_read_table(dev, cdat_doe, cdat_buf, &cdat_length);
> + rc = cxl_cdat_read_table(dev, doe_mb, cdat_buf, &cdat_length);
> if (rc)
> goto err;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-26 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-08 11:48 [PATCH v2 0/3] CDAT updates and fixes Robert Richter
2024-01-08 11:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] cxl/pci: Rename DOE mailbox handle to doe_mb Robert Richter
2024-01-19 18:05 ` Dave Jiang
2024-01-26 16:07 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-01-08 11:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] cxl/pci: Get rid of pointer arithmetic reading CDAT table Robert Richter
2024-01-26 16:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-09 8:34 ` Robert Richter
2024-01-08 11:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] lib/firmware_table: Provide buffer length argument to cdat_table_parse() Robert Richter
2024-01-19 0:32 ` Dan Williams
2024-01-19 18:18 ` Dave Jiang
2024-01-26 16:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-09 11:23 ` Robert Richter
2024-02-14 12:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240126160725.00006dba@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox