Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] PCI: qcom: Add OPP support to scale performance state of power domain

Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-01T12:07:54Z

On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 01:58:58PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 13:54, Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 11:55:17AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 at 07:17, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
> > > <quic_krichai@quicinc.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 1/12/2024 9:03 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 12 Jan 2024 at 16:25, Krishna chaitanya chundru
> > > > > <quic_krichai@quicinc.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> QCOM Resource Power Manager-hardened (RPMh) is a hardware block which
> > > > >> maintains hardware state of a regulator by performing max aggregation of
> > > > >> the requests made by all of the processors.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> PCIe controller can operate on different RPMh performance state of power
> > > > >> domain based up on the speed of the link. And this performance state varies
> > > > >> from target to target.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> It is manadate to scale the performance state based up on the PCIe speed
> > > > >> link operates so that SoC can run under optimum power conditions.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Add Operating Performance Points(OPP) support to vote for RPMh state based
> > > > >> upon GEN speed link is operating.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> OPP can handle ICC bw voting also, so move icc bw voting through opp
> > > > >> framework if opp entries are present.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> In PCIe certain gen speeds like GEN1x2 & GEN2X1 or GEN3x2 & GEN4x1 use
> > > > >> same icc bw and has frequency, so use frequency based search to reduce
> > > > >> number of entries in the opp table.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Don't initialize icc if opp is supported.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@quicinc.com>
> > > > >> ---
> > > > >> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > > > >> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > > >> index 035953f0b6d8..31512dc9d6ff 100644
> > > > >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > > >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > >> static int qcom_pcie_link_transition_count(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
> > > > >> @@ -1471,8 +1502,10 @@ static void qcom_pcie_init_debugfs(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> > > > >> static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > >> {
> > > > >> const struct qcom_pcie_cfg *pcie_cfg;
> > > > >> + unsigned long max_freq = INT_MAX;
> > > > >> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > > >> struct qcom_pcie *pcie;
> > > > >> + struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
> > > > >> struct dw_pcie_rp *pp;
> > > > >> struct resource *res;
> > > > >> struct dw_pcie *pci;
> > > > >> @@ -1539,9 +1572,33 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > >> goto err_pm_runtime_put;
> > > > >> }
> > > > >>
> > > > >> - ret = qcom_pcie_icc_init(pcie);
> > > > >> - if (ret)
> > > > >> + /* OPP table is optional */
> > > > >> + ret = devm_pm_opp_of_add_table(dev);
> > > > >> + if (ret && ret != -ENODEV) {
> > > > >> + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to add OPP table\n");
> > > > >> goto err_pm_runtime_put;
> > > > >> + }
> > > > >
> > > > > Can we initialise the table from the driver if it is not found? This
> > > > > will help us by having the common code later on.
> > > > >
> > > > we already icc voting if there is no opp table present in the dts.
> > >
> > > Yes. So later we have two different code paths: one for the OPP table
> > > being present and another one for the absent OPP table. My suggestion
> > > is to initialise minimal OPP table by hand and then have a common code
> > > path in qcom_pcie_icc_update().
> > >
> >
> > Are you suggesting to duplicate DT in the driver?
>
> As a fallback for the cases when there is no OPP table in the driver
> it might make sense. See
> Otherwise the DT is still somewhat duplicated in the form of calling
> icc functions directly.
>

No, DT is not duplicated. With this approach, we will end up hardcoding the DT
entries in the driver which sounds backwards to me. Even with 2 different code
paths, the hardware info will be left to the DT itself, so the driver just
consumes it.

So please, let's not do it.

- Mani

--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்