Re: [PATCH] fpga: dfl: fme: Return directly after a failed devm_kasprintf() call in fme_perf_pmu_register()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 06:27:25PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 06:03:12PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 03:55:19PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> > > Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 15:43:42 +0100
> 
> Sorry, something to fix.
> 
> Please shorten your shortlog to less than 75 chars.
> Please refer to Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> 
> > > 
> > > The result from a call of the function “devm_kasprintf” was passed to
> > > a subsequent function call without checking for a null pointer before
> > > (according to a memory allocation failure).
> > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> > > 
> > > Thus return directly after a failed devm_kasprintf() call.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 724142f8c42a7 ("fpga: dfl: fme: add performance reporting support")
> 
> One more char of sha.
> 
> Please use checkpatch to verify.
> 
> Thanks,
> Yilun

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot