linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Shinas Rasheed <srasheed@marvell.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<hgani@marvell.com>, <vimleshk@marvell.com>, <sedara@marvell.com>,
	<egallen@redhat.com>, <mschmidt@redhat.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<horms@kernel.org>, <wizhao@redhat.com>, <kheib@redhat.com>,
	<konguyen@redhat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@marvell.com>,
	"Satananda Burla" <sburla@marvell.com>,
	Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@amd.com>,
	"Tony Nguyen" <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Joshua Hay <joshua.a.hay@intel.com>,
	Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>,
	Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@amd.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/8] octeon_ep_vf: Add driver framework and device initialization
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 16:14:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240131161406.22a9e330@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240129050254.3047778-2-srasheed@marvell.com>

On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 21:02:47 -0800 Shinas Rasheed wrote:
> +static int octep_vf_stop(struct net_device *netdev)
> +{
> +	struct octep_vf_device *oct = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +
> +	netdev_info(netdev, "Stopping the device ...\n");
> +
> +	/* Stop Tx from stack */
> +	netif_tx_stop_all_queues(netdev);

netif_tx_disable() stops queues, IIRC. You seem to stop them twice.

> +	netif_carrier_off(netdev);
> +	netif_tx_disable(netdev);

You haven't masked any IRQ or disabled NAPI. What prevents the queues
from getting restarted right after this call?

> +static void octep_vf_tx_timeout(struct net_device *netdev, unsigned int txqueue)
> +{
> +	struct octep_vf_device *oct = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +
> +	queue_work(octep_vf_wq, &oct->tx_timeout_task);
> +}

I don't see you canceling this work. What if someone unregistered
the device before it runs? You gotta netdev_hold() a reference.

> +err_register_dev:
> +err_mbox_version:
> +	octep_vf_delete_mbox(octep_vf_dev);
> +err_setup_mbox:
> +	octep_vf_device_cleanup(octep_vf_dev);
> +err_octep_vf_config:
> +	free_netdev(netdev);
> +err_alloc_netdev:
> +	pci_release_mem_regions(pdev);
> +err_pci_regions:
> +err_dma_mask:
> +	pci_disable_device(pdev);
> +	dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Device probe failed\n");
> +	return err;
> +}

Name the labels after what you're jumping to, please.
It's so much easier to make sure the code is correct that way.

> +static int __init octep_vf_init_module(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	pr_info("%s: Loading %s ...\n", OCTEP_VF_DRV_NAME, OCTEP_VF_DRV_STRING);
> +
> +	/* work queue for all deferred tasks */
> +	octep_vf_wq = create_singlethread_workqueue(OCTEP_VF_DRV_NAME);

Is there a reason this wq has to be single threaded and different than
system queue? All you schedule on it in this series is the reset task.

> +	if (!octep_vf_wq) {
> +		pr_err("%s: Failed to create common workqueue\n",
> +		       OCTEP_VF_DRV_NAME);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = pci_register_driver(&octep_vf_driver);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		pr_err("%s: Failed to register PCI driver; err=%d\n",
> +		       OCTEP_VF_DRV_NAME, ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	pr_info("%s: Loaded successfully !\n", OCTEP_VF_DRV_NAME);

One message when driver is loaded is probably fine, but two is really
pushing it. Please don't spam the logs.

> +	return ret;
> +}
-- 
pw-bot: cr

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-01  0:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-29  5:02 [PATCH net-next v5 0/8] add octeon_ep_vf driver Shinas Rasheed
2024-01-29  5:02 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/8] octeon_ep_vf: Add driver framework and device initialization Shinas Rasheed
2024-02-01  0:14   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-02-03  5:35     ` [EXT] " Shinas Rasheed
2024-02-05 23:44       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-06  7:42         ` Shinas Rasheed
2024-02-06 15:21           ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-01-29  5:02 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/8] octeon_ep_vf: add hardware configuration APIs Shinas Rasheed
2024-01-29  5:02 ` [PATCH net-next v5 3/8] octeon_ep_vf: add VF-PF mailbox communication Shinas Rasheed
2024-01-29  5:02 ` [PATCH net-next v5 4/8] octeon_ep_vf: add Tx/Rx ring resource setup and cleanup Shinas Rasheed
2024-01-29  5:02 ` [PATCH net-next v5 5/8] octeon_ep_vf: add support for ndo ops Shinas Rasheed
2024-01-29  5:02 ` [PATCH net-next v5 6/8] octeon_ep_vf: add Tx/Rx processing and interrupt support Shinas Rasheed
2024-01-29  5:02 ` [PATCH net-next v5 7/8] octeon_ep_vf: add ethtool support Shinas Rasheed
2024-01-29  5:02 ` [PATCH net-next v5 8/8] octeon_ep_vf: update MAINTAINERS Shinas Rasheed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240131161406.22a9e330@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=brett.creeley@amd.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=egallen@redhat.com \
    --cc=hgani@marvell.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=joshua.a.hay@intel.com \
    --cc=kheib@redhat.com \
    --cc=konguyen@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mschmidt@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rrameshbabu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sburla@marvell.com \
    --cc=sedara@marvell.com \
    --cc=shannon.nelson@amd.com \
    --cc=srasheed@marvell.com \
    --cc=vburru@marvell.com \
    --cc=vimleshk@marvell.com \
    --cc=wizhao@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).