From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Peng Liu <liupeng17@lenovo.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: [PATCH 11/15] tick: Move got_idle_tick away from common flags
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 00:11:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240131231120.12006-12-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240131231120.12006-1-frederic@kernel.org>
tick_nohz_idle_got_tick() is called by cpuidle_reflect() within the idle
loop with interrupts enabled. This function modifies the struct
tick_sched's bitfield "got_idle_tick". However this bitfield is stored
within the same mask as other bitfields that can be modified from
interrupts.
Fortunately so far it looks like the only race that can happen is while
writing ->got_idle_tick to 0, an interrupt fires and writes the
->idle_active field to 0. It's then possible that the interrupted write
to ->got_idle_tick writes back the old value of ->idle_active back to 1.
However if that happens, the worst possible outcome is that the time
spent between that interrupt and the upcoming call to
tick_nohz_idle_exit() is accounted as idle, which is negligible quantity.
Still all the bitfield writes within this struct tick_sched's shadow
mask should be IRQ-safe. Therefore move this bitfield out to its own
storage to avoid further suprises.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.h b/kernel/time/tick-sched.h
index 35808bbb8a47..3b555e0fa937 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.h
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.h
@@ -61,7 +61,6 @@ struct tick_sched {
unsigned int tick_stopped : 1;
unsigned int idle_active : 1;
unsigned int do_timer_last : 1;
- unsigned int got_idle_tick : 1;
/* Tick handling: jiffies stall check */
unsigned int stalled_jiffies;
@@ -73,6 +72,7 @@ struct tick_sched {
ktime_t next_tick;
unsigned long idle_jiffies;
ktime_t idle_waketime;
+ unsigned int got_idle_tick;
/* Idle entry */
seqcount_t idle_sleeptime_seq;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-31 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-31 23:11 [PATCH 00/15 v2] timers/nohz cleanups and hotplug reorganization Frederic Weisbecker
2024-01-31 23:11 ` [PATCH 01/15] tick/nohz: Remove duplicate between tick_nohz_switch_to_nohz() and tick_setup_sched_timer() Frederic Weisbecker
2024-01-31 23:11 ` [PATCH 02/15] tick/nohz: Remove duplicate between lowres and highres handlers Frederic Weisbecker
2024-01-31 23:11 ` [PATCH 03/15] tick: Remove useless oneshot ifdeffery Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-01 9:40 ` Anna-Maria Behnsen
2024-02-01 13:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-01 14:04 ` Anna-Maria Behnsen
2024-01-31 23:11 ` [PATCH 04/15] tick: Use IS_ENABLED() whenever possible Frederic Weisbecker
2024-01-31 23:11 ` [PATCH 05/15] tick: s/tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick/tick_nohz_full_stop_tick Frederic Weisbecker
2024-01-31 23:11 ` [PATCH 06/15] tick: No need to clear ts->next_tick again Frederic Weisbecker
2024-01-31 23:11 ` [PATCH 07/15] tick: Start centralizing tick related CPU hotplug operations Frederic Weisbecker
2024-01-31 23:11 ` [PATCH 08/15] tick: Move tick cancellation up to CPUHP_AP_TICK_DYING Frederic Weisbecker
2024-01-31 23:11 ` [PATCH 09/15] tick: Move broadcast " Frederic Weisbecker
2024-01-31 23:11 ` [PATCH 10/15] tick: Assume the tick can't be stopped in NOHZ_MODE_INACTIVE mode Frederic Weisbecker
2024-01-31 23:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2024-01-31 23:11 ` [PATCH 12/15] tick: Move individual bit features to debuggable mask accesses Frederic Weisbecker
2024-01-31 23:11 ` [PATCH 13/15] tick: Split nohz and highres features from nohz_mode Frederic Weisbecker
2024-01-31 23:11 ` [PATCH 14/15] tick: Shut down low-res tick from dying CPU Frederic Weisbecker
2024-01-31 23:11 ` [PATCH 15/15] tick: Assume timekeeping is correctly handed over upon last offline idle call Frederic Weisbecker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-24 17:04 [PATCH 00/15] timers/nohz cleanups and hotplug reorganization Frederic Weisbecker
2024-01-24 17:04 ` [PATCH 11/15] tick: Move got_idle_tick away from common flags Frederic Weisbecker
2024-01-25 9:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240131231120.12006-12-frederic@kernel.org \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liupeng17@lenovo.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox