From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubsan: Silence W=1 warnings in self-test
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 02:41:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202402020239.1EEA467@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANpmjNMCBvdM7Ni+vWCQwtJbbVskOdjSA+gjhgh6R3dKRqjXnA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 10:57:11AM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 10:46, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Silence a handful of W=1 warnings in the UBSan selftest, which set
> > variables without using them. For example:
> >
> > lib/test_ubsan.c:101:6: warning: variable 'val1' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> > 101 | int val1 = 10;
> > | ^
>
> This is the shift_out_of_bounds test? It looks like the neg and wrap
> variables are volatile but the written-to variables aren't.
> Technically the compiler just has to emit the reads to neg and wrap,
> and can entirely omit the writes to val1 and val2.
>
> Does making it volatile fix the warning?
It does for some, but not all:
../lib/test_ubsan.c: In function 'test_ubsan_out_of_bounds':
../lib/test_ubsan.c:115:22: warning: variable 'arr' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
115 | volatile int arr[4];
| ^~~
../lib/test_ubsan.c:114:23: warning: variable 'above' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
114 | volatile char above[4] = { }; /* Protect surrounding memory. */
| ^~~~~
../lib/test_ubsan.c: In function 'test_ubsan_load_invalid_value':
../lib/test_ubsan.c:137:44: warning: variable 'eptr' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
137 | enum ubsan_test_enum eval, eval2, *eptr;
| ^~~~
../lib/test_ubsan.c:136:26: warning: variable 'ptr' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
136 | bool val, val2, *ptr;
| ^~~
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-02 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-02 9:45 [PATCH] ubsan: Silence W=1 warnings in self-test Kees Cook
2024-02-02 9:57 ` Marco Elver
2024-02-02 10:41 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-02-02 10:43 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202402020239.1EEA467@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox