From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (relay5-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7A8E17BA4; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 07:55:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.197 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706860555; cv=none; b=Pe/v7OCl4RS/uuTDq4yKjWOSn58t2yMFmlyRzgfTfHCnMCxPbxq15wQWj3Ruf3Xp/AZ67yL2LfY6Vlyds2evLa3a0wt/uG4Ztn58AFpDH4Lb1KHZygfC0zMn8R9OUGqYw0E5JSHle+cgbDMd4vWv85dCQVjVnluzP7wLFx1qj6w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706860555; c=relaxed/simple; bh=68hL+FZLLcrrCGOYzkanDw/JbY5cOul8cp+uyDfPMTY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QLS1WlDXJbdSKXIEJ0VBriMJkf5+xPZk4Bc/iW/LJkPs+JTpGFInQE+gs62EtYDV0PCiM1iFopDG2MDCp2NThm/ShesBTl7hrJDzO1gr5+8X8mMwqeJjTUpkK90QouA0r7rhlUUaRKFkSs4Pt9K3q8HzDZFng/9XseQnUriRHjA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=nYYKAISt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.197 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="nYYKAISt" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5CDD1C0007; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 07:55:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1706860549; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=68hL+FZLLcrrCGOYzkanDw/JbY5cOul8cp+uyDfPMTY=; b=nYYKAIStwHLyok/90gVQUFipyrI5YTOPkDuMKsKZ6iZU4RCiPkvWu2iiOmX9O+5I1v1zss tbBKziub+xr6Xg6lIMCdA330UzueJNF2KyZfD1DNKcyh3N9SkN+KesMvgETxfb0m5Fdhr2 Q4ZSRQ/LvGHV6fs4wiNe5HtG6OzJVAKVm2hYcabkrIAd8jTzWdCtclIzjqHcEAOEUn3EYV Mtdmr0Gfe9Nb1YdP2ZZW9Vk6BoL5mQExjs0m1n5UKNwqGil2nussRjtsJudP7ekEQgSkwA 9ICpSqtpNWUUUzgpLyObGH93FcSHrWV4Kuo7mEKiZ2SgMtUk30wxome9qPJedQ== Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 08:55:47 +0100 From: Miquel Raynal To: Bo Liu Cc: , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ieee802154: at86rf230: convert to use maple tree register cache Message-ID: <20240202085547.46c81c96@xps-13> In-Reply-To: <20240202064512.39259-1-liubo03@inspur.com> References: <20240202064512.39259-1-liubo03@inspur.com> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-GND-Sasl: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com Hi Bo, liubo03@inspur.com wrote on Fri, 2 Feb 2024 01:45:12 -0500: > The maple tree register cache is based on a much more modern data structu= re > than the rbtree cache and makes optimisation choices which are probably > more appropriate for modern systems than those made by the rbtree cache. What are the real intended benefits? Shall we expect any drawbacks? > Signed-off-by: Bo Liu Thanks, Miqu=C3=A8l