From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Jinghao Jia <jinghao7@illinois.edu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/kprobes: Boost more instructions from grp2/3/4/5
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 21:09:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240204210932.bd112a37dd3c276b046f6b16@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240204031300.830475-4-jinghao7@illinois.edu>
On Sat, 3 Feb 2024 21:13:00 -0600
Jinghao Jia <jinghao7@illinois.edu> wrote:
> With the instruction decoder, we are now able to decode and recognize
> instructions with opcode extensions. There are more instructions in
> these groups that can be boosted:
>
> Group 2: ROL, ROR, RCL, RCR, SHL/SAL, SHR, SAR
> Group 3: TEST, NOT, NEG, MUL, IMUL, DIV, IDIV
> Group 4: INC, DEC (byte operation)
> Group 5: INC, DEC (word/doubleword/quadword operation)
>
> These instructions are not boosted previously because there are reserved
> opcodes within the groups, e.g., group 2 with ModR/M.nnn == 110 is
> unmapped. As a result, kprobes attached to them requires two int3 traps
> as being non-boostable also prevents jump-optimization.
>
> Some simple tests on QEMU show that after boosting and jump-optimization
> a single kprobe on these instructions with an empty pre-handler runs 10x
> faster (~1000 cycles vs. ~100 cycles).
>
> Since these instructions are mostly ALU operations and do not touch
> special registers like RIP, let's boost them so that we get the
> performance benefit.
>
This looks good to me. And can you check how many instructions in the
vmlinux will be covered by this change typically?
Thank you,
> Signed-off-by: Jinghao Jia <jinghao7@illinois.edu>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> index 7a08d6a486c8..530f6d4b34f4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> @@ -169,22 +169,33 @@ bool can_boost(struct insn *insn, void *addr)
> case 0x62: /* bound */
> case 0x70 ... 0x7f: /* Conditional jumps */
> case 0x9a: /* Call far */
> - case 0xc0 ... 0xc1: /* Grp2 */
> case 0xcc ... 0xce: /* software exceptions */
> - case 0xd0 ... 0xd3: /* Grp2 */
> case 0xd6: /* (UD) */
> case 0xd8 ... 0xdf: /* ESC */
> case 0xe0 ... 0xe3: /* LOOP*, JCXZ */
> case 0xe8 ... 0xe9: /* near Call, JMP */
> case 0xeb: /* Short JMP */
> case 0xf0 ... 0xf4: /* LOCK/REP, HLT */
> - case 0xf6 ... 0xf7: /* Grp3 */
> - case 0xfe: /* Grp4 */
> /* ... are not boostable */
> return false;
> + case 0xc0 ... 0xc1: /* Grp2 */
> + case 0xd0 ... 0xd3: /* Grp2 */
> + /*
> + * AMD uses nnn == 110 as SHL/SAL, but Intel makes it reserved.
> + */
> + return X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) != 0b110;
> + case 0xf6 ... 0xf7: /* Grp3 */
> + /* AMD uses nnn == 001 as TEST, but Intel makes it reserved. */
> + return X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) != 0b001;
> + case 0xfe: /* Grp4 */
> + /* Only INC and DEC are boostable */
> + return X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 0b000 ||
> + X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 0b001;
> case 0xff: /* Grp5 */
> - /* Only indirect jmp is boostable */
> - return X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 4;
> + /* Only INC, DEC, and indirect JMP are boostable */
> + return X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 0b000 ||
> + X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 0b001 ||
> + X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 0b100;
> default:
> return true;
> }
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-04 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-04 3:12 [PATCH v2 0/3] x86/kprobes: add exception opcode detector and boost more opcodes Jinghao Jia
2024-02-04 3:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/kprobes: Refactor can_{probe,boost} return type to bool Jinghao Jia
2024-02-04 12:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-02-04 3:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/kprobes: Prohibit kprobing on INT and UD Jinghao Jia
2024-02-04 3:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/kprobes: Boost more instructions from grp2/3/4/5 Jinghao Jia
2024-02-04 12:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2024-02-05 4:39 ` Jinghao Jia
2024-02-06 23:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240204210932.bd112a37dd3c276b046f6b16@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jinghao7@illinois.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox