public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390/fpu: make use of __uninitialized macro
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 17:35:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240205163529.8558-A-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202402050822.E6E6E978@keescook>

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 08:26:32AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > +#define DECLARE_KERNEL_FPU_ONSTACK(name)	\
> > +	struct kernel_fpu name __uninitialized
> 
> Are there cases when struct kernel_fpu should be initialized? e.g.
> should the attribute just be added to the struct definition instead of
> marking each use?

I tried that, but failed:

./arch/s390/include/asm/fpu/types.h:36:3: warning: '__uninitialized__' attribute only applies to local variables [-Wignored-attributes]
   36 | } __uninitialized;
      |   ^
./include/linux/compiler_attributes.h:343:42: note: expanded from macro '__uninitialized'
  343 | # define __uninitialized                __attribute__((__uninitialized__))
      |                                                        ^

That's why I came up with this macro. I'd prefer to have this added only to
the struct definition, but looks like this is not possible (or I just can't
figure out who to do that).

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-05 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-05 15:48 [PATCH 0/2] Compiler Attributes, s390: Provide and use __uninitialized macro Heiko Carstens
2024-02-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] Compiler Attributes: Add " Heiko Carstens
2024-02-05 16:21   ` Kees Cook
2024-02-06  1:28   ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-02-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] s390/fpu: make use of " Heiko Carstens
2024-02-05 16:26   ` Kees Cook
2024-02-05 16:35     ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2024-02-05 17:00       ` Kees Cook
2024-02-06  1:31   ` Nathan Chancellor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240205163529.8558-A-hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox