From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (relay9-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70D0112C541; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 08:59:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.199 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707209993; cv=none; b=mTo9+/bXK+MEA30xBpz7o9VadJYZvurtH9hNVxho8GQOp/zX3XMQsZ8h8/w/qMtEzPZXb+yBphz8nv/DWEHjwGuW3djYXS+U76NCGHSROl3/h4H7XWD1YRV46lMW6lyFxjKjQXIe14eLvIXBL2rT1NYGAFsFb2c6vEa1F+9ryR0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707209993; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JZWoZl8RGgLWPx+gK8cXes8dw9X6gICGMEVTHwFXxmw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=APFJg8RP5Tll+VKc6CY0ZCHAIBxPkCCRa35GqAcb4/X5ZPF0YYUyNLAzXw3MCi20GhHC0evI1aYl38XJDm2rPJJ2B17wXpfkx1BrhuZwa9zv4T25fdbjnmY31UXKhFiR15DUU7lLoGLg+UJ+t6RKIVWUtgKqwz5otWNZORwymII= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=PptRUyWm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.199 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="PptRUyWm" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB9B8FF80D; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 08:59:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1707209983; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JZWoZl8RGgLWPx+gK8cXes8dw9X6gICGMEVTHwFXxmw=; b=PptRUyWmO7ox0PRxfN/ZpDEoxOZV7PAbsJKx7Hhj1pTuY7N2DlPLCByN+1uJhckt+zdTGF HP0w0NCPtHRnu5ATO6JpHrlkwZGEn2dkMhixEbGf4pGa9bN92flDK/uLASmlzA1FUNshhT ylJH63kzmbqQuIzKHlqAryLLLuCMyqcs7rz2hjnKj+w4ql6cWKXy/twchByZrgsz0yzKc7 aaJeO3Y7ddz1emEN0kX3f4p3kiKRRcWyz3LvhL0hNf2d0lTnLeBnbRkDWIMk6Gxwj9f2yd Ro/6cYsL12dpwlAIidDXFQgdtgKhryK8kuCi/EFrCqzjvCOtfjX5YJabLxmqSg== Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 09:59:40 +0100 From: Miquel Raynal To: Tejun Heo Cc: Alexander Aring , Stefan Schmidt , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ieee802154: ca8210: Drop spurious WQ_UNBOUND from alloc_ordered_workqueue() call Message-ID: <20240206095940.66e17802@xps-13> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-GND-Sasl: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com Hi Tejun, tj@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:53:54 -1000: > Workqueue is in the process of cleaning up the distinction between unbound > workqueues w/ @nr_active=3D=3D1 and ordered workqueues. Explicit WQ_UNBOU= ND > isn't needed for alloc_ordered_workqueue() and will trigger a warning in = the > future. Let's remove it. This doesn't cause any functional changes. >=20 Looks okay to me. Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal Thanks, Miqu=C3=A8l