From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Cestmir Kalina <ckalina@redhat.com>,
Alex Gladkov <agladkov@redhat.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
Costa Shulyupin <cshulyup@redhat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH wq/for-6.9 v4 3/4] kernel/workqueue: Let rescuers follow unbound wq cpumask changes
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 20:19:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240207011911.975608-4-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240207011911.975608-1-longman@redhat.com>
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
When workqueue cpumask changes are committed the associated rescuer (if
one exists) affinity is not touched and this might be a problem down the
line for isolated setups.
Make sure rescuers affinity is updated every time a workqueue cpumask
changes, so that rescuers can't break isolation.
[longman: set_cpus_allowed_ptr() will block until the designated task
is enqueued on an allowed CPU, no wake_up_process() needed. Also use
the unbound_effective_cpumask() helper as suggested by Tejun.]
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 49fe082fe328..3044ad6f9496 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -5084,6 +5084,11 @@ static void apply_wqattrs_commit(struct apply_wqattrs_ctx *ctx)
/* update node_nr_active->max */
wq_update_node_max_active(ctx->wq, -1);
+ /* rescuer needs to respect wq cpumask changes */
+ if (ctx->wq->rescuer)
+ set_cpus_allowed_ptr(ctx->wq->rescuer->task,
+ unbound_effective_cpumask(ctx->wq));
+
mutex_unlock(&ctx->wq->mutex);
}
--
2.39.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-07 1:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-07 1:19 [PATCH wq/for-6.9 v4 0/4] workqueue: Enable unbound cpumask update on ordered workqueues Waiman Long
2024-02-07 1:19 ` [PATCH wq/for-6.9 v4 1/4] workqueue: Link pwq's into wq->pwqs from oldest to newest Waiman Long
2024-02-07 1:19 ` [PATCH wq/for-6.9 v4 2/4] workqueue: Enable unbound cpumask update on ordered workqueues Waiman Long
2024-02-07 17:25 ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-07 20:59 ` Waiman Long
2024-02-07 21:18 ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-07 1:19 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2024-02-07 1:19 ` [PATCH wq/for-6.9 v4 4/4] workqueue: Bind unbound workqueue rescuer to wq_unbound_cpumask Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240207011911.975608-4-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=agladkov@redhat.com \
--cc=ckalina@redhat.com \
--cc=cshulyup@redhat.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox