From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 139B95FBB5 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:07:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707844054; cv=none; b=EpPhrWCtPo1D8Zkbvn9Yq8LhUp1XHmbSDY6tPbhHPZnnxseh82fnu75HCeyM4ymxptoj+CzelwdvY/ZpaLEORujnhaCNkaepqqHxLydiw4Lhijox+nCQaKD8aQy6BWHD1OmqcfMYK9EkPQXrg1QOFPe13GgE+j9d9EdvV6coxk0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707844054; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8xJ6K3YxeTLXM/pbjDu4CB5rW5SThx69MqqZcbcYC0k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tq2LFO4Z7aYTbM90ZNEy5BG7IhCGWYgcCQOBgJ8Oet7yOLgj0KTCp0+Vd7IuIRBNsbJ5pTud+uyt/+EorfV/uKYaHCdyW2neyXnwJHomBCG2GVG19dlMyaiREeTc2beW2ZOaw+Pwv/NCCrHDBligBeso/h6MFlJnC1S86hdcNIQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=qslBWslz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qslBWslz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C257C43399; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:07:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1707844053; bh=8xJ6K3YxeTLXM/pbjDu4CB5rW5SThx69MqqZcbcYC0k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qslBWslzQ5gumYuJoCGE2B3dgzVw7zZdW+CiWRsYhGSx6QwqVv8wx5D9IGYFufFrh Z+HI6bkKVaoLUrvAKP1CxP6pOMsVlAx40TrJW5OM9zoJjPihzvpAnO7JW80AyMkD+l 5fGUv5d8JetNS1TXqMeQEZlt4BLRQxCpTAzuy91ZSwgoeN8jI6qFuRaozkX2xtwaEp OpLuWDfFTLYCRfM9gbeX9FxhS7V2rp6o3gllPgfyVhDUjlpQLYKsW3sVTKRZt6hwqm 4pDoFktD5756W/lQjajtriFNnEZFZXNiO72OfKqu0faTLI+7IWYAhncJoADla8QixL SBx18ySlG45Uw== Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:07:29 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Samuel Holland Cc: Palmer Dabbelt , Andrew Jones , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stefan O'Rear Subject: Re: [PATCH -fixes v2 2/4] dt-bindings: riscv: Add ratified privileged ISA versions Message-ID: <20240213-cilantro-operator-acbf40493bbd@spud> References: <20240213033744.4069020-1-samuel.holland@sifive.com> <20240213033744.4069020-3-samuel.holland@sifive.com> <20240213-limping-ether-adbdc205ebc6@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u2GAsATBmAnP+sFu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240213-limping-ether-adbdc205ebc6@spud> --u2GAsATBmAnP+sFu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 05:03:46PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 07:37:33PM -0800, Samuel Holland wrote: > > The baseline for the RISC-V privileged ISA is version 1.10. Using > > features from newer versions of the privileged ISA requires the > > supported version to be reported by platform firmware, either in the ISA > > string (where the binding already accepts version numbers) or in the > > riscv,isa-extensions property. So far two newer versions are ratified. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland > > --- > >=20 > > Changes in v2: > > - New patch for v2 > >=20 > > .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml | 20 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) > >=20 > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml b/= Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml > > index 63d81dc895e5..7faf22df01af 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml > > @@ -121,6 +121,16 @@ properties: > > version of the privileged ISA specification. > > =20 > > # multi-letter extensions, sorted alphanumerically >=20 > > + - const: sm1p11 >=20 > Why are we beholden to this "1p11" format of RVI's? We have free choice > of characters here, what's stopping us using "machine-v1.11", for > example? We could also choose to communicate this using a specific property, but I have not really thought that one through yet. --u2GAsATBmAnP+sFu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZcuh0QAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0kU0AP9uxqhi6Z2+S2utazinjy8ljsSHNNck/QoB6/noAi95sgEAwXNwzyDHMqVL OfP6NZnX2lys3JrbYHWSXQjvFwxgCgU= =Eqbk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u2GAsATBmAnP+sFu--