public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>, Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>,
	kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] gpio: use srcu_dereference() with SRCU-protected pointers
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:44:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240214084419.6194-4-brgl@bgdev.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240214084419.6194-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

Lockdep with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU enabled reports false positives about
suspicious rcu_dereference() usage. Let's silence it by using
srcu_dereference() which is the correct helper with SRCU.

Fixes: d83cee3d2bb1 ("gpio: protect the pointer to gpio_chip in gpio_device with SRCU")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202402122234.d85cca9b-lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c |  5 +++--
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c       | 16 ++++++++--------
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h       |  3 ++-
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
index 6285fa5afbb1..71ba2a774197 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/srcu.h>
 #include <linux/sysfs.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
 
@@ -756,7 +757,7 @@ int gpiochip_sysfs_register(struct gpio_device *gdev)
 
 	guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
 
-	chip = rcu_dereference(gdev->chip);
+	chip = srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
 	if (!chip)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
@@ -800,7 +801,7 @@ void gpiochip_sysfs_unregister(struct gpio_device *gdev)
 
 	guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
 
-	chip = rcu_dereference(gdev->chip);
+	chip = srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
 	if (chip)
 		return;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 439d32d5aa38..b095f475805f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ const char *gpiod_get_label(struct gpio_desc *desc)
 		return "interrupt";
 
 	return test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &flags) ?
-			rcu_dereference(desc->label) : NULL;
+			srcu_dereference(desc->label, &desc->srcu) : NULL;
 }
 
 static int desc_set_label(struct gpio_desc *desc, const char *label)
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpio_name_to_desc(const char * const name)
 				 srcu_read_lock_held(&gpio_devices_srcu)) {
 		guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
 
-		gc = rcu_dereference(gdev->chip);
+		gc = srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
 		if (!gc)
 			continue;
 
@@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@ struct gpio_device *gpio_device_find(void *data,
 				 srcu_read_lock_held(&gpio_devices_srcu)) {
 		guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
 
-		gc = rcu_dereference(gdev->chip);
+		gc = srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
 
 		if (gc && match(gc, data))
 			return gpio_device_get(gdev);
@@ -2978,7 +2978,7 @@ static int gpiod_get_raw_value_commit(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 
 	guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
 
-	gc = rcu_dereference(gdev->chip);
+	gc = srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
 	if (!gc)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
@@ -3012,7 +3012,7 @@ static bool gpio_device_chip_cmp(struct gpio_device *gdev, struct gpio_chip *gc)
 {
 	guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
 
-	return gc == rcu_dereference(gdev->chip);
+	return gc == srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
 }
 
 int gpiod_get_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
@@ -3593,7 +3593,7 @@ int gpiod_to_irq(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 	gdev = desc->gdev;
 	/* FIXME Cannot use gpio_chip_guard due to const desc. */
 	guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
-	gc = rcu_dereference(gdev->chip);
+	gc = srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
 	if (!gc)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
@@ -4787,7 +4787,7 @@ static void gpiolib_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_device *gdev)
 
 	guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
 
-	gc = rcu_dereference(gdev->chip);
+	gc = srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
 	if (!gc) {
 		seq_puts(s, "Underlying GPIO chip is gone\n");
 		return;
@@ -4872,7 +4872,7 @@ static int gpiolib_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
 
 	guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
 
-	gc = rcu_dereference(gdev->chip);
+	gc = srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
 	if (!gc) {
 		seq_printf(s, "%s%s: (dangling chip)",
 			   priv->newline ? "\n" : "",
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
index 07443d26cbca..ada36aa0f81a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
@@ -202,7 +202,8 @@ DEFINE_CLASS(gpio_chip_guard,
 
 		_guard.gdev = desc->gdev;
 		_guard.idx = srcu_read_lock(&_guard.gdev->srcu);
-		_guard.gc = rcu_dereference(_guard.gdev->chip);
+		_guard.gc = srcu_dereference(_guard.gdev->chip,
+					     &_guard.gdev->srcu);
 
 		_guard;
 	     }),
-- 
2.40.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-14  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-14  8:44 [PATCH v2 0/4] gpio: fix SRCU bugs Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-14  8:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] gpio: take the SRCU read lock in gpiod_hog() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-14  8:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] gpio: cdev: use correct pointer accessors with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-16 10:31   ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-02-16 10:50     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-26 14:27   ` kernel test robot
2024-02-27 16:44     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-14  8:44 ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2024-02-14  8:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] gpio: don't let lockdep complain about inherently dangerous RCU usage Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-14 12:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] gpio: fix SRCU bugs Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-14 13:02   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-14 13:17 ` Mark Brown
2024-02-14 13:22   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-14 18:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-14 19:08   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-14 20:44     ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-21 21:45     ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-15  7:43 ` Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240214084419.6194-4-brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=elder@linaro.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox