public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: jiangshanlai@gmail.com
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	allen.lkml@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 15/17] workqueue: Update how start_flush_work() is called
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 08:04:56 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240216180559.208276-16-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240216180559.208276-1-tj@kernel.org>

In prepartion of in-BH canceling of BH work items, update start_flush_work()
so that:

- rcu_read_lock()'ing is moved to the caller.

- Instead of true or false, it now returns the worker_pool associated with
  the work item if the work item needs to be waited for. NULL if waiting is
  not needed.

- Add a WARN if it encounters a queued work item when @from_cancel. This
  shouldn't happen.

No behavior changes are intended.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 6a2abc81ae2b..f6ea25628701 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3995,8 +3995,9 @@ void drain_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drain_workqueue);
 
-static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
-			     bool from_cancel)
+static struct worker_pool *start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work,
+					    struct wq_barrier *barr,
+					    bool from_cancel)
 {
 	struct worker *worker = NULL;
 	struct worker_pool *pool;
@@ -4005,12 +4006,9 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
 
 	might_sleep();
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	pool = get_work_pool(work);
-	if (!pool) {
-		rcu_read_unlock();
-		return false;
-	}
+	if (!pool)
+		return NULL;
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
 	/* see the comment in try_to_grab_pending() with the same code */
@@ -4018,6 +4016,12 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
 	if (pwq) {
 		if (unlikely(pwq->pool != pool))
 			goto already_gone;
+		/*
+		 * Cancel path should already have removed @work from worklist
+		 * in try_to_grab_pending(). Control should get here iff we need
+		 * to wait for the current execution to finish.
+		 */
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(from_cancel);
 	} else {
 		worker = find_worker_executing_work(pool, work);
 		if (!worker)
@@ -4045,17 +4049,16 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
 	if (!from_cancel && (wq->saved_max_active == 1 || wq->rescuer))
 		touch_wq_lockdep_map(wq);
 
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-	return true;
+	return pool;
 already_gone:
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-	return false;
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 static bool __flush_work(struct work_struct *work, bool from_cancel)
 {
 	struct wq_barrier barr;
+	struct worker_pool *pool;
 
 	if (WARN_ON(!wq_online))
 		return false;
@@ -4063,13 +4066,15 @@ static bool __flush_work(struct work_struct *work, bool from_cancel)
 	if (WARN_ON(!work->func))
 		return false;
 
-	if (start_flush_work(work, &barr, from_cancel)) {
-		wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
-		destroy_work_on_stack(&barr.work);
-		return true;
-	} else {
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	pool = start_flush_work(work, &barr, from_cancel);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	if (!pool)
 		return false;
-	}
+
+	wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
+	destroy_work_on_stack(&barr.work);
+	return true;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.43.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-16 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-16 18:04 [PATCHSET wq/for-6.9,6.10] workqueue: Implement disable/enable_work() Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 01/17] workqueue: Cosmetic changes Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 02/17] workqueue: Use rcu_read_lock_any_held() instead of rcu_read_lock_held() Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 03/17] workqueue: Rename __cancel_work_timer() to __cancel_timer_sync() Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 04/17] workqueue: Reorganize flush and cancel[_sync] functions Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 05/17] workqueue: Use variable name irq_flags for saving local irq flags Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 06/17] workqueue: Introduce work_cancel_flags Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 07/17] workqueue: Clean up enum work_bits and related constants Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 08/17] workqueue: Factor out work_grab_pending() from __cancel_work_sync() Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 09/17] workqueue: Remove clear_work_data() Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 10/17] workqueue: Make @flags handling consistent across set_work_data() and friends Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 11/17] workqueue: Preserve OFFQ bits in cancel[_sync] paths Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 12/17] workqueue: Implement disable/enable for (delayed) work items Tejun Heo
2024-02-20  7:22   ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-02-20 18:38     ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-21  2:54       ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-02-21  5:47         ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-26  3:42   ` Boqun Feng
2024-02-26 18:30     ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 13/17] workqueue: Remove WORK_OFFQ_CANCELING Tejun Heo
2024-02-20  7:23   ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-02-20 18:53     ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 14/17] workqueue: Remember whether a work item was on a BH workqueue Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 16/17] workqueue: Allow cancel_work_sync() and disable_work() from atomic contexts on BH work items Tejun Heo
2024-02-20  7:33   ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-02-20 20:01     ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 17/17] r8152: Convert from tasklet to BH workqueue Tejun Heo
2024-02-20 17:33 ` [PATCHSET wq/for-6.9,6.10] workqueue: Implement disable/enable_work() Allen
2024-02-20 20:25 ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-20 21:38   ` Allen
2024-02-22 20:26     ` Allen
2024-02-26 18:38       ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-27 17:56         ` Allen
2024-02-21  2:39   ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-02-21  5:39     ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-21 17:03       ` Allen
2024-02-25 17:40         ` Kees Cook
2024-02-26 17:30           ` Allen
2024-02-26 18:30             ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240216180559.208276-16-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=allen.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox