From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: jiangshanlai@gmail.com
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
allen.lkml@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 15/17] workqueue: Update how start_flush_work() is called
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 08:04:56 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240216180559.208276-16-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240216180559.208276-1-tj@kernel.org>
In prepartion of in-BH canceling of BH work items, update start_flush_work()
so that:
- rcu_read_lock()'ing is moved to the caller.
- Instead of true or false, it now returns the worker_pool associated with
the work item if the work item needs to be waited for. NULL if waiting is
not needed.
- Add a WARN if it encounters a queued work item when @from_cancel. This
shouldn't happen.
No behavior changes are intended.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 6a2abc81ae2b..f6ea25628701 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3995,8 +3995,9 @@ void drain_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drain_workqueue);
-static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
- bool from_cancel)
+static struct worker_pool *start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work,
+ struct wq_barrier *barr,
+ bool from_cancel)
{
struct worker *worker = NULL;
struct worker_pool *pool;
@@ -4005,12 +4006,9 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
might_sleep();
- rcu_read_lock();
pool = get_work_pool(work);
- if (!pool) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
- return false;
- }
+ if (!pool)
+ return NULL;
raw_spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
/* see the comment in try_to_grab_pending() with the same code */
@@ -4018,6 +4016,12 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
if (pwq) {
if (unlikely(pwq->pool != pool))
goto already_gone;
+ /*
+ * Cancel path should already have removed @work from worklist
+ * in try_to_grab_pending(). Control should get here iff we need
+ * to wait for the current execution to finish.
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(from_cancel);
} else {
worker = find_worker_executing_work(pool, work);
if (!worker)
@@ -4045,17 +4049,16 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
if (!from_cancel && (wq->saved_max_active == 1 || wq->rescuer))
touch_wq_lockdep_map(wq);
- rcu_read_unlock();
- return true;
+ return pool;
already_gone:
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
- rcu_read_unlock();
- return false;
+ return NULL;
}
static bool __flush_work(struct work_struct *work, bool from_cancel)
{
struct wq_barrier barr;
+ struct worker_pool *pool;
if (WARN_ON(!wq_online))
return false;
@@ -4063,13 +4066,15 @@ static bool __flush_work(struct work_struct *work, bool from_cancel)
if (WARN_ON(!work->func))
return false;
- if (start_flush_work(work, &barr, from_cancel)) {
- wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
- destroy_work_on_stack(&barr.work);
- return true;
- } else {
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ pool = start_flush_work(work, &barr, from_cancel);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (!pool)
return false;
- }
+
+ wait_for_completion(&barr.done);
+ destroy_work_on_stack(&barr.work);
+ return true;
}
/**
--
2.43.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-16 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-16 18:04 [PATCHSET wq/for-6.9,6.10] workqueue: Implement disable/enable_work() Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 01/17] workqueue: Cosmetic changes Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 02/17] workqueue: Use rcu_read_lock_any_held() instead of rcu_read_lock_held() Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 03/17] workqueue: Rename __cancel_work_timer() to __cancel_timer_sync() Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 04/17] workqueue: Reorganize flush and cancel[_sync] functions Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 05/17] workqueue: Use variable name irq_flags for saving local irq flags Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 06/17] workqueue: Introduce work_cancel_flags Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 07/17] workqueue: Clean up enum work_bits and related constants Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 08/17] workqueue: Factor out work_grab_pending() from __cancel_work_sync() Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 09/17] workqueue: Remove clear_work_data() Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 10/17] workqueue: Make @flags handling consistent across set_work_data() and friends Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 11/17] workqueue: Preserve OFFQ bits in cancel[_sync] paths Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 12/17] workqueue: Implement disable/enable for (delayed) work items Tejun Heo
2024-02-20 7:22 ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-02-20 18:38 ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-21 2:54 ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-02-21 5:47 ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-26 3:42 ` Boqun Feng
2024-02-26 18:30 ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 13/17] workqueue: Remove WORK_OFFQ_CANCELING Tejun Heo
2024-02-20 7:23 ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-02-20 18:53 ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 14/17] workqueue: Remember whether a work item was on a BH workqueue Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 16/17] workqueue: Allow cancel_work_sync() and disable_work() from atomic contexts on BH work items Tejun Heo
2024-02-20 7:33 ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-02-20 20:01 ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-16 18:04 ` [PATCH 17/17] r8152: Convert from tasklet to BH workqueue Tejun Heo
2024-02-20 17:33 ` [PATCHSET wq/for-6.9,6.10] workqueue: Implement disable/enable_work() Allen
2024-02-20 20:25 ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-20 21:38 ` Allen
2024-02-22 20:26 ` Allen
2024-02-26 18:38 ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-27 17:56 ` Allen
2024-02-21 2:39 ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-02-21 5:39 ` Tejun Heo
2024-02-21 17:03 ` Allen
2024-02-25 17:40 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-26 17:30 ` Allen
2024-02-26 18:30 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240216180559.208276-16-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=allen.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox