From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, bsegall@google.com, bristot@redhat.com,
vschneid@redhat.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] sched/fair: Simplify and optimize update_sd_pick_busiest()
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 13:44:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240216194440.GA1682@maniforge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240206043921.850302-1-void@manifault.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2101 bytes --]
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 10:39:18PM -0600, David Vernet wrote:
> update_sd_pick_busiest() (and its caller) has some room for small
> optimizations, and some improvements in readability.
Hello Peter, hello Ingo,
Friendly ping. Is there anything else required for this to land?
Thanks,
David
>
> - In update_sd_lb_stats(), we're using a goto to skip a single if check.
> Let's remove the goto and just add another condition to the if.
>
> - In update_sd_pick_busiest(), only update a group_misfit_task group to
> be the busiest if it has strictly more load than the current busiest
> task, rather than >= the load.
>
> - When comparing the current struct sched_group with the yet-busiest
> domain in update_sd_pick_busiest(), if the two groups have the same
> group type, we're currently doing a bit of unnecessary work for any
> group >= group_misfit_task. We're comparing the two groups, and then
> returning only if false (the group in question is not the busiest).
> Othewise, we break, do an extra unnecessary conditional check that's
> vacuously false for any group type > group_fully_busy, and then always
> return true. This patch series has us instead simply return directly
> in the switch statement, saving some bytes in load_balance().
>
> ---
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240202070216.2238392-1-void@manifault.com/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240204044618.46100-1-void@manifault.com/
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - Add Vincent's Reviewed-by tags
> - Fix stale commit summary sentence (Vincent)
>
> v1 -> v2 changes:
>
> - Split the patch series into separate patches (Valentin)
> - Update the group_misfit_task busiest check to use strict inequality
>
> David Vernet (3):
> sched/fair: Remove unnecessary goto in update_sd_lb_stats()
> sched/fair: Do strict inequality check for busiest misfit task group
> sched/fair: Simplify some logic in update_sd_pick_busiest()
>
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 ++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-16 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-06 4:39 [PATCH v3 0/3] sched/fair: Simplify and optimize update_sd_pick_busiest() David Vernet
2024-02-06 4:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] sched/fair: Remove unnecessary goto in update_sd_lb_stats() David Vernet
2024-02-28 22:00 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for David Vernet
2024-02-06 4:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] sched/fair: Do strict inequality check for busiest misfit task group David Vernet
2024-02-06 13:17 ` Valentin Schneider
2024-02-28 22:00 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for David Vernet
2024-02-06 4:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] sched/fair: Simplify some logic in update_sd_pick_busiest() David Vernet
2024-02-28 22:00 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Simplify the update_sd_pick_busiest() logic tip-bot2 for David Vernet
2024-02-16 19:44 ` David Vernet [this message]
2024-02-26 17:50 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] sched/fair: Simplify and optimize update_sd_pick_busiest() David Vernet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240216194440.GA1682@maniforge \
--to=void@manifault.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox