public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@huawei.com>,
	Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] rcu-tasks: Maintain lists to eliminate RCU-tasks/do_exit() deadlocks
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 17:27:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240217012745.3446231-5-boqun.feng@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240217012745.3446231-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

This commit continues the elimination of deadlocks involving do_exit()
and RCU tasks by causing exit_tasks_rcu_start() to add the current
task to a per-CPU list and causing exit_tasks_rcu_stop() to remove the
current task from whatever list it is on.  These lists will be used to
track tasks that are exiting, while still accounting for any RCU-tasks
quiescent states that these tasks pass though.

[ paulmck: Apply Frederic Weisbecker feedback. ]

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240118021842.290665-1-chenzhongjin@huawei.com/

Reported-by: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
Reported-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index 4a5d562e3189..68a8adf7de8e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -1151,25 +1151,48 @@ struct task_struct *get_rcu_tasks_gp_kthread(void)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_rcu_tasks_gp_kthread);
 
 /*
- * Contribute to protect against tasklist scan blind spot while the
- * task is exiting and may be removed from the tasklist. See
- * corresponding synchronize_srcu() for further details.
+ * Protect against tasklist scan blind spot while the task is exiting and
+ * may be removed from the tasklist.  Do this by adding the task to yet
+ * another list.
+ *
+ * Note that the task will remove itself from this list, so there is no
+ * need for get_task_struct(), except in the case where rcu_tasks_pertask()
+ * adds it to the holdout list, in which case rcu_tasks_pertask() supplies
+ * the needed get_task_struct().
  */
-void exit_tasks_rcu_start(void) __acquires(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu)
+void exit_tasks_rcu_start(void)
 {
-	current->rcu_tasks_idx = __srcu_read_lock(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu);
+	unsigned long flags;
+	struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp;
+	struct task_struct *t = current;
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&t->rcu_tasks_exit_list));
+	preempt_disable();
+	rtpcp = this_cpu_ptr(rcu_tasks.rtpcpu);
+	t->rcu_tasks_exit_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
+	if (!rtpcp->rtp_exit_list.next)
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rtpcp->rtp_exit_list);
+	list_add(&t->rcu_tasks_exit_list, &rtpcp->rtp_exit_list);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
+	preempt_enable();
 }
 
 /*
- * Contribute to protect against tasklist scan blind spot while the
- * task is exiting and may be removed from the tasklist. See
- * corresponding synchronize_srcu() for further details.
+ * Remove the task from the "yet another list" because do_exit() is now
+ * non-preemptible, allowing synchronize_rcu() to wait beyond this point.
  */
-void exit_tasks_rcu_stop(void) __releases(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu)
+void exit_tasks_rcu_stop(void)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
+	struct rcu_tasks_percpu *rtpcp;
 	struct task_struct *t = current;
 
-	__srcu_read_unlock(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu, t->rcu_tasks_idx);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&t->rcu_tasks_exit_list));
+	rtpcp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_tasks.rtpcpu, t->rcu_tasks_exit_cpu);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
+	list_del_init(&t->rcu_tasks_exit_list);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rtpcp, flags);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-17  1:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-17  1:27 [PATCH v2 0/6] RCU tasks fixes for v6.9 Boqun Feng
2024-02-17  1:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] rcu-tasks: Repair RCU Tasks Trace quiescence check Boqun Feng
2024-02-17  1:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] rcu-tasks: Add data to eliminate RCU-tasks/do_exit() deadlocks Boqun Feng
2024-02-22 16:54   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-22 20:46     ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-17  1:27 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] rcu-tasks: Initialize " Boqun Feng
2024-02-22 16:21   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-22 20:41     ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-23 11:39       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-17  1:27 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2024-02-22 16:32   ` [PATCH v2 4/6] rcu-tasks: Maintain lists " Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-23 12:19   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-24  0:28     ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-17  1:27 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] rcu-tasks: Eliminate deadlocks involving do_exit() and RCU tasks Boqun Feng
2024-02-22 16:46   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-17  1:27 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] rcu-tasks: Maintain real-time response in rcu_tasks_postscan() Boqun Feng
2024-02-22 17:48   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-22 20:52     ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-22 22:56       ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-23 12:17         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-23 15:14           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-24  0:23             ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-22 16:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] RCU tasks fixes for v6.9 Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-22 22:09   ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-23 12:25     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-24  0:43       ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-02-26 13:56         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-02-26 14:37           ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240217012745.3446231-5-boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com \
    --cc=chenzhongjin@huawei.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=yangjihong1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox