From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
<linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Fan Ni <nifan.cxl@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] cxl/pci: Get rid of pointer arithmetic reading CDAT table
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 12:50:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240219125059.0000737c@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240216155844.406996-3-rrichter@amd.com>
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:58:43 +0100
Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com> wrote:
> Reading the CDAT table using DOE requires a Table Access Response
> Header in addition to the CDAT entry. In current implementation this
> has caused offsets with sizeof(__le32) to the actual buffers. This led
> to hardly readable code and even bugs. E.g., see fix of devm_kfree()
> in read_cdat_data():
>
> c65efe3685f5 cxl/cdat: Free correct buffer on checksum error
>
> Rework code to avoid calculations with sizeof(__le32). Introduce
> struct cdat_doe_rsp for this which contains the Table Access Response
> Header and a variable payload size for various data structures
> afterwards to access the CDAT table and its CDAT Data Structures
> without recalculating buffer offsets.
>
> Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> Cc: Fan Ni <nifan.cxl@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Ok. I suspect we could fine tune this for ever but changes here look good
enough to me and definitely nicer than the original ;)
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h | 24 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> index 39366ce94985..763c39456228 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> @@ -544,55 +544,57 @@ static int cxl_cdat_get_length(struct device *dev,
>
> static int cxl_cdat_read_table(struct device *dev,
> struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb,
> - void *cdat_table, size_t *cdat_length)
> + struct cdat_doe_rsp *rsp, size_t *length)
> {
> - size_t length = *cdat_length + sizeof(__le32);
> - __le32 *data = cdat_table;
> - int entry_handle = 0;
> + size_t received, remaining = *length;
> + unsigned int entry_handle = 0;
> + union cdat_data *data;
> __le32 saved_dw = 0;
>
> do {
> __le32 request = CDAT_DOE_REQ(entry_handle);
> - struct cdat_entry_header *entry;
> - size_t entry_dw;
> int rc;
>
> rc = pci_doe(doe_mb, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
> CXL_DOE_PROTOCOL_TABLE_ACCESS,
> &request, sizeof(request),
> - data, length);
> + rsp, sizeof(*rsp) + remaining);
> if (rc < 0) {
> dev_err(dev, "DOE failed: %d", rc);
> return rc;
> }
>
> - /* 1 DW Table Access Response Header + CDAT entry */
> - entry = (struct cdat_entry_header *)(data + 1);
> - if ((entry_handle == 0 &&
> - rc != sizeof(__le32) + sizeof(struct cdat_header)) ||
> - (entry_handle > 0 &&
> - (rc < sizeof(__le32) + sizeof(*entry) ||
> - rc != sizeof(__le32) + le16_to_cpu(entry->length))))
> + if (rc < sizeof(*rsp))
> return -EIO;
>
> + data = (union cdat_data *)rsp->data;
> + received = rc - sizeof(*rsp);
> +
> + if (entry_handle == 0) {
> + if (received != sizeof(data->header))
> + return -EIO;
> + } else {
> + if (received < sizeof(data->entry) ||
> + received != le16_to_cpu(data->entry.length))
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> /* Get the CXL table access header entry handle */
> entry_handle = FIELD_GET(CXL_DOE_TABLE_ACCESS_ENTRY_HANDLE,
> - le32_to_cpu(data[0]));
> - entry_dw = rc / sizeof(__le32);
> - /* Skip Header */
> - entry_dw -= 1;
> + le32_to_cpu(rsp->doe_header));
> +
> /*
> * Table Access Response Header overwrote the last DW of
> * previous entry, so restore that DW
> */
> - *data = saved_dw;
> - length -= entry_dw * sizeof(__le32);
> - data += entry_dw;
> - saved_dw = *data;
> + rsp->doe_header = saved_dw;
> + remaining -= received;
> + rsp = (void *)rsp + received;
> + saved_dw = rsp->doe_header;
> } while (entry_handle != CXL_DOE_TABLE_ACCESS_LAST_ENTRY);
>
> /* Length in CDAT header may exceed concatenation of CDAT entries */
> - *cdat_length -= length - sizeof(__le32);
> + *length -= remaining;
>
> return 0;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-19 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-16 15:58 [PATCH v4 0/3] CDAT updates and fixes Robert Richter
2024-02-16 15:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] cxl/pci: Rename DOE mailbox handle to doe_mb Robert Richter
2024-02-16 15:58 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] cxl/pci: Get rid of pointer arithmetic reading CDAT table Robert Richter
2024-02-19 12:50 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-02-25 14:21 ` Robert Richter
2024-02-16 15:58 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] lib/firmware_table: Provide buffer length argument to cdat_table_parse() Robert Richter
2024-02-17 10:43 ` kernel test robot
2024-02-17 21:39 ` [PATCH v5] " Robert Richter
2024-02-19 12:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-18 12:58 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] " kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240219125059.0000737c@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=nifan.cxl@gmail.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox