From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Huang Jiaqing <jiaqing.huang@intel.com>,
Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Use device rbtree in iopf reporting path
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:31:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240221153108.GA13491@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67391b2d-b441-4d43-aa46-2a30c95420a3@linux.intel.com>
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 03:02:00PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> A device hot removing goes through at least the following steps:
>
> - Disable PRI.
> - Drain all outstanding I/O page faults.
> - Stop DMA.
> - Unload the device driver.
> - Call iommu_release_device() upon the BUS_NOTIFY_REMOVED_DEVICE event.
>
> This sequence ensures that a device cannot generate an I/O page fault
> after PRI has been disabled. So in reality it's impossible for a device
> to generate an I/O page fault before disabling PRI and then go through
> the long journey to reach iommu_release_device() before
> iopf_get_dev_fault_param() is called in page fault interrupt handling
> thread.
Why is this impossible? Seems like a classic race..
Flush the HW page fault queue as part of the above to ensure there is
no concurrent iopf_get_dev_fault_param() on the now PRI disabled BDF.
> Considering this behavior, adding a comment to the code explaining the
> sequence and removing put_device() may be a simpler solution?
A comment is definitely needed
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-21 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-15 7:22 [PATCH 0/2] iommu/vt-d: Introduce rbtree for probed devices Lu Baolu
2024-02-15 7:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu/vt-d: Use rbtree to track iommu " Lu Baolu
2024-02-15 17:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-18 4:22 ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-19 2:45 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-02-19 4:04 ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-19 5:33 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-02-19 6:47 ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-19 7:24 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-02-15 7:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Use device rbtree in iopf reporting path Lu Baolu
2024-02-15 17:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-18 7:02 ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-21 15:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2024-02-21 7:04 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-02-21 7:37 ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-19 6:54 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-02-19 6:58 ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-19 7:06 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-02-19 7:22 ` Baolu Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240221153108.GA13491@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jiaqing.huang@intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox