public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Huang Jiaqing <jiaqing.huang@intel.com>,
	Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Use device rbtree in iopf reporting path
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:31:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240221153108.GA13491@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67391b2d-b441-4d43-aa46-2a30c95420a3@linux.intel.com>

On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 03:02:00PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> A device hot removing goes through at least the following steps:
> 
> - Disable PRI.
> - Drain all outstanding I/O page faults.
> - Stop DMA.
> - Unload the device driver.
> - Call iommu_release_device() upon the BUS_NOTIFY_REMOVED_DEVICE event.
> 
> This sequence ensures that a device cannot generate an I/O page fault
> after PRI has been disabled. So in reality it's impossible for a device
> to generate an I/O page fault before disabling PRI and then go through
> the long journey to reach iommu_release_device() before
> iopf_get_dev_fault_param() is called in page fault interrupt handling
> thread.

Why is this impossible? Seems like a classic race..

Flush the HW page fault queue as part of the above to ensure there is
no concurrent iopf_get_dev_fault_param() on the now PRI disabled BDF.

> Considering this behavior, adding a comment to the code explaining the
> sequence and removing put_device() may be a simpler solution?

A comment is definitely needed

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-21 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-15  7:22 [PATCH 0/2] iommu/vt-d: Introduce rbtree for probed devices Lu Baolu
2024-02-15  7:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu/vt-d: Use rbtree to track iommu " Lu Baolu
2024-02-15 17:47   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-18  4:22     ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-19  2:45   ` Ethan Zhao
2024-02-19  4:04     ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-19  5:33       ` Ethan Zhao
2024-02-19  6:47         ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-19  7:24           ` Ethan Zhao
2024-02-15  7:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Use device rbtree in iopf reporting path Lu Baolu
2024-02-15 17:55   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-18  7:02     ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-21 15:31       ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2024-02-21  7:04     ` Ethan Zhao
2024-02-21  7:37       ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-19  6:54   ` Ethan Zhao
2024-02-19  6:58     ` Baolu Lu
2024-02-19  7:06       ` Ethan Zhao
2024-02-19  7:22         ` Baolu Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240221153108.GA13491@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jiaqing.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox