public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, bsegall@google.com, bristot@redhat.com,
	vschneid@redhat.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] sched/fair: Simplify and optimize update_sd_pick_busiest()
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:50:28 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240226175028.GA1903@maniforge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240216194440.GA1682@maniforge>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2133 bytes --]

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 01:44:40PM -0600, David Vernet wrote:
> Hello Peter, hello Ingo,
> 
> Friendly ping. Is there anything else required for this to land?

Hello,

Sending another ping.

Thanks,
David

> 
> Thanks,
> David
> 
> > 
> > - In update_sd_lb_stats(), we're using a goto to skip a single if check.
> >   Let's remove the goto and just add another condition to the if.
> > 
> > - In update_sd_pick_busiest(), only update a group_misfit_task group to
> >   be the busiest if it has strictly more load than the current busiest
> >   task, rather than >= the load.
> > 
> > - When comparing the current struct sched_group with the yet-busiest
> >   domain in update_sd_pick_busiest(), if the two groups have the same
> >   group type, we're currently doing a bit of unnecessary work for any
> >   group >= group_misfit_task. We're comparing the two groups, and then
> >   returning only if false (the group in question is not the busiest).
> >   Othewise, we break, do an extra unnecessary conditional check that's
> >   vacuously false for any group type > group_fully_busy, and then always
> >   return true. This patch series has us instead simply return directly
> >   in the switch statement, saving some bytes in load_balance().
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240202070216.2238392-1-void@manifault.com/
> > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240204044618.46100-1-void@manifault.com/
> > 
> > v2 -> v3:
> > - Add Vincent's Reviewed-by tags
> > - Fix stale commit summary sentence (Vincent)
> > 
> > v1 -> v2 changes:
> > 
> > - Split the patch series into separate patches (Valentin)
> > - Update the group_misfit_task busiest check to use strict inequality
> > 
> > David Vernet (3):
> >   sched/fair: Remove unnecessary goto in update_sd_lb_stats()
> >   sched/fair: Do strict inequality check for busiest misfit task group
> >   sched/fair: Simplify some logic in update_sd_pick_busiest()
> > 
> >  kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 ++++---------------
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.43.0
> > 



[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2024-02-26 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-06  4:39 [PATCH v3 0/3] sched/fair: Simplify and optimize update_sd_pick_busiest() David Vernet
2024-02-06  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] sched/fair: Remove unnecessary goto in update_sd_lb_stats() David Vernet
2024-02-28 22:00   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for David Vernet
2024-02-06  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] sched/fair: Do strict inequality check for busiest misfit task group David Vernet
2024-02-06 13:17   ` Valentin Schneider
2024-02-28 22:00   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for David Vernet
2024-02-06  4:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] sched/fair: Simplify some logic in update_sd_pick_busiest() David Vernet
2024-02-28 22:00   ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Simplify the update_sd_pick_busiest() logic tip-bot2 for David Vernet
2024-02-16 19:44 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] sched/fair: Simplify and optimize update_sd_pick_busiest() David Vernet
2024-02-26 17:50   ` David Vernet [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240226175028.GA1903@maniforge \
    --to=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox