public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Tina Zhang <tina.zhang@intel.com>,
	Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>,
	Jingqi Liu <Jingqi.liu@intel.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] iommu/vt-d: Use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc()
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:14:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240227021441.50434-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240227021441.50434-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

From: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>

This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1].

Here the multiplication is obviously safe because DMAR_LATENCY_NUM
is the number of latency types defined in the "latency_type" enum.

enum latency_type {
	DMAR_LATENCY_INV_IOTLB = 0,
	DMAR_LATENCY_INV_DEVTLB,
	DMAR_LATENCY_INV_IEC,
	DMAR_LATENCY_PRQ,
	DMAR_LATENCY_NUM
};

However, using kcalloc() is more appropriate [2] and improves
readability. This patch has no effect on runtime behavior.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162 [1]
Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [2]
Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240211175143.9229-1-erick.archer@gmx.com
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/perf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/perf.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/perf.c
index 94ee70ac38e3..adc4de6bbd88 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/perf.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/perf.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ int dmar_latency_enable(struct intel_iommu *iommu, enum latency_type type)
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&latency_lock, flags);
 	if (!iommu->perf_statistic) {
-		iommu->perf_statistic = kzalloc(sizeof(*lstat) * DMAR_LATENCY_NUM,
+		iommu->perf_statistic = kcalloc(DMAR_LATENCY_NUM, sizeof(*lstat),
 						GFP_ATOMIC);
 		if (!iommu->perf_statistic) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-27  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-27  2:14 [PATCH 0/8] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for Linux v6.9 Lu Baolu
2024-02-27  2:14 ` [PATCH 1/8] iommu/vt-d: Remove INTEL_IOMMU_BROKEN_GFX_WA Lu Baolu
2024-02-27  2:14 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2024-02-27  2:14 ` [PATCH 3/8] iommu/vt-d: Add the document for Intel IOMMU debugfs Lu Baolu
2024-02-27  2:14 ` [PATCH 4/8] iommu/vt-d: Remove treatment for revoking PASIDs with pending page faults Lu Baolu
2024-02-27  2:14 ` [PATCH 5/8] iommu/vt-d: Remove initialization for dynamically heap-allocated rcu_head Lu Baolu
2024-02-27  2:14 ` [PATCH 6/8] iommu/vt-d: Merge intel_svm_bind_mm() into its caller Lu Baolu
2024-02-27  2:14 ` [PATCH 7/8] iommu/vt-d: Use rbtree to track iommu probed devices Lu Baolu
2024-02-27  2:14 ` [PATCH 8/8] iommu/vt-d: Use device rbtree in iopf reporting path Lu Baolu
2024-03-01 12:52 ` [PATCH 0/8] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for Linux v6.9 Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240227021441.50434-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Jingqi.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=erick.archer@gmx.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tina.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox