public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] ACPI: scan: Rework Device Check and Bus Check notification handling
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:39:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240227093948.000050c9@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1958983.PYKUYFuaPT@kreacher>

On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:45:11 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:

> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> The underlying problem is the handling of the enabled bit in device
> status (bit 1 of _STA return value) which is required by the ACPI
> specification to be observed in addition to the present bit (bit 0
> of _STA return value) [1], but Linux does not observe it.
> 
> Since Linux has not looked at that bit for a long time, it is generally
> risky to start obseving it in all device enumeration cases, especially
> at the system initialization time, but it can be observed when the
> kernel receives a Bus Check or Device Check notification indicating a
> change in device configuration.  In those cases, seeing the enabled bit
> clear may be regarded as an indication that the device at hand should
> not be used any more.
> 
> For this reason, rework the handling of Device Check and Bus Check
> notifications in the ACPI core device enumeration code in the
> following way:
> 
>  1. Rename acpi_bus_trim_one() to acpi_scan_check_and_detach() and make
>     it check device status if its second argument is not NULL, in which
>     case it will detach scan handlers or ACPI drivers from devices whose
>     _STA returns the enabled bit clear.

New name is much better - thanks!

> 
>  2. Make acpi_scan_device_check() and acpi_scan_bus_check() invoke
>     acpi_scan_check_and_detach() with a non-NULL second argument
>     unconditionally, so scan handlers and ACPI drivers are detached
>     from the target device and its ancestors if their _STA returns the
>     enabled bit clear.
> 
> Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/06_Device_Configuration.html#sta-device-status # [1]
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-27  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-26 16:24 [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI: scan: Check enabled _STA bit on Bus/Device Checks Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: scan: Fix device check notification handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ACPI: scan: Relocate acpi_bus_trim_one() Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:49   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI: scan: Make acpi_processor_add() check the device enabled bit Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-27  9:28   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-27 11:13     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-26 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ACPI: scan: Rework Device Check and Bus Check notification handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-27  9:39   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-02-26 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI: scan: Consolidate " Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-27  9:41   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240227093948.000050c9@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox